GG Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 How about the idiot paster not burn the books, and the idiot imam find another building a few more blocks away that wasn't hit by the landing gear of a commercial jet filled with innocent people that was being used as a bomb to demolish lower manhattan killing as many Amercians as possible. Well, the entire area south of Canal Street was barricaded after 9/11. I think everything that was inside that blocked area should be off limits to anyting Muslim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 This thread reminds me of the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky fiasco. Although the issue was whether he committed and suborned perjury, the double digit IQ crowd (and the willfully stupid political allies) kept talking about adultery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 I think everything that was inside that blocked area should be off limits to anyting Muslim. Well THAT would be awkward, since Wall Street uses math. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Well, the entire area south of Canal Street was barricaded after 9/11. I think everything that was inside that blocked area should be off limits to anyting Muslim. You claim to be above the petty and then post THIS bull ****? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Well THAT would be awkward, since Wall Street uses math. You claim to be above the petty and then post THIS bull ****? I'm glad to see you take obvious sarcasm so personally. You fuggin' dolt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Well THAT would be awkward, since Wall Street uses math. Didn't math & the alphabet predate Mohammed? Unles they claim squatters rights to zoroastrians? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Well THAT would be awkward, since Wall Street uses math. Awesome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Didn't math & the alphabet predate Mohammed? Unles they claim squatters rights to zoroastrians? just by 3000 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Didn't math & the alphabet predate Mohammed? Unles they claim squatters rights to zoroastrians? "Algebra" derives from al jabr, either "the counting" or "to count" (forget which, exactly). Until Islam invented it, all else was either bookkeeping or, if you were Greek, geometry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Can someone PLEASE tell me where "Ground Zero" ends? By the sounds of it, it's somewhere around Flatbush, Mt Vernon, or West Orange. Hmmm? Maybe at the purple mountain majesties above the fruited plains? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 (edited) Hmmm? Maybe at the purple mountain majesties above the fruited plains? The fruited plains have rotted out, while the democrats, republicans and zealots argued over nothing.....or in better terms, while we fiddled, rome burned This thread reminds me of the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky fiasco. Although the issue was whether he committed and suborned perjury, the double digit IQ crowd (and the willfully stupid political allies) kept talking about adultery. It was boneheaded all around. Clinton shouldn't have lied- only an idiot would disagree with that. Never should have been asked about it though, until he allows himself to be blackmailed about it. It is one of the best examples of how far our country has fallen and is very non-partisan. But there are those who just want us to close our eyes and keep chanting about how America is made from the best stuff on Earth..... How about the idiot paster not burn the books, and the idiot imam find another building a few more blocks away that wasn't hit by the landing gear of a commercial jet filled with innocent people that was being used as a bomb to demolish lower manhattan killing as many Amercians as possible. Isn't there already a mosque there? And if there isn't, what is the problem- Muslims were lost there, as well as Christians, Jews and people of many other religions factions. People have to start realizing that we weren't attacked by Muslims, we were attacked by terrorists and thugs. The guy burning the Korans is a plain hateful idiot. To be honest, I think he is trying to stir up retaliation. Edited September 8, 2010 by Adam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 It was boneheaded all around. Clinton shouldn't have lied- only an idiot would disagree with that. Never should have been asked about it though, until he allows himself to be blackmailed about it. It is one of the best examples of how far our country has fallen and is very non-partisan. And Kenneth Starr should have been B word-slapped for turning an investigation of a real-estate deal into some salacious tabloid-esque witch hunt for anything Clinton might have done wrong, ever. A seriously !@#$ing embarrassing moment in American history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Link Rauf said that, in retrospect, he might have chosen a different location for what he described as a multifaith community center. "If I knew this would happen, if it would cause this kind of pain, I wouldn't have done it," he said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 I'm glad to see you take obvious sarcasm so personally. You fuggin' dolt. I didnt take it personally. You !@#$ing schmuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Link I saw the interview last night and wondered why it (moving the mosque) would upset the extremists and cause problems. So, who really wants the mosque there? The extremists? What is their purpose for wanting it there? I guess I'm just confused. He wouldn't have put it there if he knew how it would upset Americans but he can't change its location because it would upset the extremists? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 I didnt take it personally. You !@#$ing schmuck. Nice try but you have pretty much zero credibility on this topic. Well, and most other ones that require any thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 It was boneheaded all around. Clinton shouldn't have lied- only an idiot would disagree with that. Never should have been asked about it though, until he allows himself to be blackmailed about it. It is one of the best examples of how far our country has fallen and is very non-partisan. But there are those who just want us to close our eyes and keep chanting about how America is made from the best stuff on Earth..... I never actually blamed him for lying about trying to get some on the side any more than I blamed Nixon for not snitching on his friends. What I found interesting was how persistently and effectively the issue was reframed to be one of adultery rather than perjury, just the way the issue of the mosque is being reframed as the right to build a mosque (islamic center) rather than a question of good v bad intentions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 I never actually blamed him for lying about trying to get some on the side any more than I blamed Nixon for not snitching on his friends. What I found interesting was how persistently and effectively the issue was reframed to be one of adultery rather than perjury, just the way the issue of the mosque is being reframed as the right to build a mosque (islamic center) rather than a question of good v bad intentions. I think you have that last part backwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 I think you have that last part backwards. How do you mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 http://abcnews.go.com/US/ground-mosque-imam-project-ahead-interest-national-security/story?id=11589316 Looks like another bigoted anti-Muslim racist has chimed in on the stupid notion of "the small minority." Oh...thats "sarcasm" there, Darin you dick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts