reddogblitz Posted May 6, 2010 Posted May 6, 2010 THank goodness that it is Brohm V Edwards right now. I don't see any redeeming qualities about Fitz as a starter. For some reason, I think one of these two guys is going to surprise....... THank goodness that it is Brohm V Fitz right now. I don't see any redeeming qualities about Trent as a starter. For some reason, I think one of these two guys is going to surprise.......
sllib olaffub Posted May 6, 2010 Posted May 6, 2010 Other teams use this rookie mini-camp to allow the whole team to work out. I realize we've got a lot of rookies, and added to second year players we've probably got something like 30-40 guys... but, I did wonder after I read that Brohm was invited, if they weren't deliberately creating a situation to exclude the other QB's - sort of giving the favorite a little extra. Now that I'm writing it, though, I guess they would obviously want the young guy to be a stud, and they probably just have so many rookies and second year guys that they need another arm. I was tempted to put more into it than just that.
CarolinaBill Posted May 6, 2010 Posted May 6, 2010 Love all the Brohm love now!! but where were you all while I alone repeatedly called for Brohm's shot to start??? Are the Lefavour lovers going to follow his career in Chicago; what about the McCoy fans in Cleveland? or McNabb in DC? Brohm is and has been the plan and it's a good plan - yes, but I've liked brohm since we signed him last year, and even coming out of college, so I hope he does well and wins the Job.
tonyd19 Posted May 6, 2010 Posted May 6, 2010 I am hoping we finally found the anti captain checkdown. Wasn't that JP Loseman?
San Jose Bills Fan Posted May 6, 2010 Posted May 6, 2010 FYI, in addition to 2010 rookies: "Here is the rundown of first and second-year players on the Bills roster that are expected to participate in the team’s rookie minicamp this weekend. On offense Brian Brohm Christian Gaddis Nick Hennessey Felton Huggins Steve Johnson Andy Levitre Walter Mendenhall Jamon Meredith Shawn Nelson Andre Ramsey Jonathan Stupar Jason Watkins Defense Reggie Corner Jon Corto Rashaad Duncan Chris Ellis Marlon Favorite Cary Harris Lonnie Harvey Ellis Lankster Ryan Manalac Aaron Maybin Leodis Mckelvin Lydell Sargeant Keep in mind it is voluntary for first and second-year players to participate and some like Jairus Byrd, Eric Wood and Nic Harris are coming off of injury situations and are likely not fit to participate yet. Veterans cannot participate by league rule." http://blogs.buffalobills.com/2010/05/06/n...g-this-weekend/
bfw1234 Posted May 6, 2010 Posted May 6, 2010 Brohm will need a LT and a #2 WR though - that would help!
TITAN Posted May 6, 2010 Posted May 6, 2010 I'd like to see Fitz cut, and Edwards, Brohm and Brown on the depth chart. Many hate Edwards, but he is accurate and with some coaching to change his decision making he has the best chance to succeed due to his time in the NFL. Brohm would be better suited as the #2, because he will have more time to absorb the NFL game under Gailey, and he isn't thrown to the wolves by being named starter right out of the gate. Fitz is irrelevant to me. He doesn't have a shot of being starter, and if he isn't, he's of no use to this team as a backup. It would be better to give those reps to Brohm.
CardinalScotts Posted May 6, 2010 Posted May 6, 2010 Those that are a little more familiar with Brohm....is this guy mobile, does he like to run ? I can only recall the Louisville days and he was a accurate good throwing quarterback at that level just curious if he's a statue or like to run
Alphadawg7 Posted May 6, 2010 Posted May 6, 2010 Those that are a little more familiar with Brohm....is this guy mobile, does he like to run ? I can only recall the Louisville days and he was a accurate good throwing quarterback at that level just curious if he's a statue or like to run He is Tom Brady kind of mobile (and NOOOO, I am not comparing him to Brady or saying he is as good in the pocket as Brady...just using Brady as a reference to the TYPE of mobility Brohm has)...What I mean is that Brady isnt the kind of guy that you worry about scrambling down field, but he is mobile in the pocket and has a good sense of the rush. That was what Brohm was able to do in college...he isnt going to rip off a 10 yard run at will, but he did have good pocket mobility, and in his last season he was often scrambling for his life at Louisville as their line wasnt very good...something I am sure he will be experiencing here until this line can pull together and someone can step up and man the LT spot. So no, he isnt a runner, but he deomstrated good pocket presence in college, so hopefully that pocket mobility can be something he can bring to this level as he is going to need it until this line solidifies.
Alphadawg7 Posted May 6, 2010 Posted May 6, 2010 Love all the Brohm love now!! but where were you all while I alone repeatedly called for Brohm's shot to start??? Are the Lefavour lovers going to follow his career in Chicago; what about the McCoy fans in Cleveland? or McNabb in DC? Brohm is and has been the plan and it's a good plan - LOL...you werent alone...a lot of us have been, just that we were in the minority before. Now that the FO and staff have shown a vote of confidence in the potential in these guys others have opened up to the idea too. Only time will tell if it works out, but I can't see any negative reason not to give the kid a shot given how little we have invested in him and the upside he brings to the table. Little risk, Big reward potential is always a win win for a team...Merdith is another low risk, big reward kind of guy too...
bfw1234 Posted May 6, 2010 Posted May 6, 2010 who is the #2 wr on this team? while I completely endorse BROHM - I wonder who he'll be throwing to? or what his blind side protection will be?
The Senator Posted May 6, 2010 Posted May 6, 2010 Love all the Brohm love now!! but where were you all while I alone repeatedly called for Brohm's shot to start??? Are the Lefavour lovers going to follow his career in Chicago; what about the McCoy fans in Cleveland? or McNabb in DC? Brohm is and has been the plan and it's a good plan - Um, 'you, alone'???? Where were you on Pearl Harbor Day last year? Link 1 - December 7th, 2009 Link 2 - December 7th, 2009
Alphadawg7 Posted May 6, 2010 Posted May 6, 2010 Um, 'you, alone'???? Where were you on Pearl Harbor Day last year? Link 1 - December 7th, 2009 Link 2 - December 7th, 2009 LOL...ah, late to the party...I was supporting Brohm in multiple threads in November, where were you Senator...lol
DollarBill3181 Posted May 7, 2010 Posted May 7, 2010 LOL...ah, late to the party...I was supporting Brohm in multiple threads in November, where were you Senator...lol While I have no proof of it (as you see I dont post much - I was a member since NOV09 and followed the boards for a few years now) I did always support Brohm. For two reasons I hope hes the starter: 1) I think he does have it, the talent and intangibles, to be a good NFL starter. We will obviously see through training camp, but Im hoping, and thinking it can happen. 2) Even if hes not like the first reason says, there is no possibly way he is worse than Fitz or Edwards. Fitz is reliable, but avg at best, just a career backup type guy. I want Fitz as the #2 wily-ole-vet. Brown is a decent #3 project guy. Trent Edwards? There is no way anyone (even Derek Anderson who beat him in the 6-3 loss! Remember that people who though "Edwards deserves another shot"?) This guy didnt get prectice squaded as a #4. They tried to hide him there to develop him knowing he wasnt in their plans THAT year. They thought no one would pick up a guy with a QB 2nd rd contract off waivers. Well, Buffalo did.
3irty1 Posted May 7, 2010 Posted May 7, 2010 I beat all of you, I wanted Brohm to start DAY 1 he was on the Bills. From the moment i heard we lost him to you guys I thought... "Hell Yeah! can't wait to see him pull the team around!"
eball Posted May 7, 2010 Posted May 7, 2010 I have previously opined that the QB rotation opening the season will be (in order): Edwards Brohm Brown Fitz (cut) I am slowly buying into the Brohm hype machine, however. The fact he gets the benefit of some one-on-one coaching this weekend, as a 3rd year player, is interesting. If Brohm actually does win the starting job, then my assessment of the roster becomes this: Brohm Fitz Brown Edwards (cut) My rationale is that Fitz is much better suited to the backup role than Edwards. I don't think Trentative is worth a **** if he's not the starter. And with that said, if Edwards is lights out during camp and preseason and earns the starting job, I have no problem with it whatsoever.
bfw1234 Posted May 7, 2010 Posted May 7, 2010 Um, 'you, alone'???? Where were you on Pearl Harbor Day last year? Link 1 - December 7th, 2009 Link 2 - December 7th, 2009 Yes Hot Rod stands corrected - I'm being reminded that there were a few of us with the vision. hoping this rookie camp has the core of our team going forward - Brohm, Spiller, Nelson, Uconn WR, Wood (not practicing) Levitre, etc
bfw1234 Posted May 7, 2010 Posted May 7, 2010 That'd be Spiller yeah Spiller needs to be the outlet and can run the wheel pattern - also, please can they get Nelson involved down the middle??? Nelson could be a major weapon but still who is #2 WR???
Doc Posted May 7, 2010 Posted May 7, 2010 yeah Spiller needs to be the outlet and can run the wheel pattern - also, please can they get Nelson involved down the middle??? Nelson could be a major weapon but still who is #2 WR??? In name it will be Hardy or Johnson. Less likely, Marcus Easley.
Recommended Posts