Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok, let's get 'em outta da way now.

 

He's gonna need a stiff defense.

He's gonna do hard time.

He was only caught because the dicks (slang for detective) were on his case.

I hope the judge isn't soft on him.

Sounds like a rooster and bull defense strategy.

Hopefully the prosecution doesn't suck.

If he claims that this made him kill people at an overlook shouldn't there be murders every day at Viagara Falls?

Posted
Ok, let's get 'em outta da way now.

 

He's gonna need a stiff defense.

He's gonna do hard time.

He was only caught because the dicks (slang for detective) were on his case.

I hope the judge isn't soft on him.

Sounds like a rooster and bull defense strategy.

Hopefully the prosecution doesn't suck.

If he claims that this made him kill people at an overlook shouldn't there be murders every day at Viagara Falls?

 

:D

Posted

Snopes has a piece on "The Twinkie Defense" that's interesting.

 

Twinkies were never claimed as the reason for the murders. The defendant claimed depression drove him to it and his defense noted that the defendant had been a health food nut and that his eating Twinkies was a sign of his depression. It's been misreported since then.

Posted
Snopes has a piece on "The Twinkie Defense" that's interesting.

 

Twinkies were never claimed as the reason for the murders. The defendant claimed depression drove him to it and his defense noted that the defendant had been a health food nut and that his eating Twinkies was a sign of his depression. It's been misreported since then.

 

Cool article, thanks.

Posted
geez...that is the lamest excuse or "mitigating factor" I've ever heard of. I hope the sob gets the harshest punishment available.

 

How about a 20 gauge to the nutsack? Sounds appropriate to me...

×
×
  • Create New...