/dev/null Posted May 1, 2010 Share Posted May 1, 2010 http://hamptonroads.com/2010/04/parkway-mu...hancement-pills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted May 2, 2010 Share Posted May 2, 2010 ... The My Twinkie Defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWVaBeach Posted May 2, 2010 Share Posted May 2, 2010 ... The My Twinkie Defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted May 2, 2010 Share Posted May 2, 2010 http://hamptonroads.com/2010/04/parkway-mu...hancement-pills Gives whole new meaning to "getting off" if this defense works Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted May 2, 2010 Share Posted May 2, 2010 Ok, let's get 'em outta da way now. He's gonna need a stiff defense. He's gonna do hard time. He was only caught because the dicks (slang for detective) were on his case. I hope the judge isn't soft on him. Sounds like a rooster and bull defense strategy. Hopefully the prosecution doesn't suck. If he claims that this made him kill people at an overlook shouldn't there be murders every day at Viagara Falls? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted May 2, 2010 Share Posted May 2, 2010 Ok, let's get 'em outta da way now. He's gonna need a stiff defense. He's gonna do hard time. He was only caught because the dicks (slang for detective) were on his case. I hope the judge isn't soft on him. Sounds like a rooster and bull defense strategy. Hopefully the prosecution doesn't suck. If he claims that this made him kill people at an overlook shouldn't there be murders every day at Viagara Falls? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted May 2, 2010 Share Posted May 2, 2010 Snopes has a piece on "The Twinkie Defense" that's interesting. Twinkies were never claimed as the reason for the murders. The defendant claimed depression drove him to it and his defense noted that the defendant had been a health food nut and that his eating Twinkies was a sign of his depression. It's been misreported since then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted May 2, 2010 Share Posted May 2, 2010 Snopes has a piece on "The Twinkie Defense" that's interesting. Twinkies were never claimed as the reason for the murders. The defendant claimed depression drove him to it and his defense noted that the defendant had been a health food nut and that his eating Twinkies was a sign of his depression. It's been misreported since then. Cool article, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted May 2, 2010 Share Posted May 2, 2010 I never thought those things worked, but I was wrong - they obviously turned him into a big dick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tennesseeboy Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 geez...that is the lamest excuse or "mitigating factor" I've ever heard of. I hope the sob gets the harshest punishment available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sig1Hunter Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 geez...that is the lamest excuse or "mitigating factor" I've ever heard of. I hope the sob gets the harshest punishment available. How about a 20 gauge to the nutsack? Sounds appropriate to me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts