Frez Posted November 30, 2004 Author Posted November 30, 2004 How about Bill Parcells or Joe Gibbs? Has the game passed them by?
Like A Mofo Posted November 30, 2004 Posted November 30, 2004 I still think Pittsburgh will be exposed at just the wrong time, watch.
JStranger76 Posted November 30, 2004 Posted November 30, 2004 Falcons, hands down. PRETENDERS!!!!!!!!!!
jarthur31 Posted November 30, 2004 Posted November 30, 2004 What team is the biggest fraud this year?Falcons? 138620[/snapback] Jagwawds. Can't put a whoopin anybody. At least we can and we suck.
BuffOrange Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 The Chargers lost to the Colts and Seahawks in Preseason. If the Broncos lose to the Chargers, I'm the Hurdy Gurdy Man. Indy, Pgh, Denver, New England and The Jets (who have beaten the Chargers already) are all --still--better than the Chargers. Chargers = Fraud 138705[/snapback] Since we're bringing back old threads, say hello to Hurdy Gurdy Man...
Greg de'Ville Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 The NFC. The Snow White Iggles and the 15 Dwarfs.
gantrules Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 The Bills. Seriously who have we beat? The Jets? Everyone else we've beat sucks.
gantrules Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 The Bills. Seriously who have we beat? The Jets? Everyone else we've beat sucks. 2 of our 6 wins are against the 2-10 Dolphins, 1 against the Cards, 1 against Seattle (Dallas Beat them), 1 against the Rams (Miami beat them) and 1 against the Jets who most of you think are pretenders. So how exactly are we any good? If a team wins the games put in front of them they are as good as their record indicates. Last time I checked Atlanta beat Denver in Denver..they are 4-1 on the road and all of those games were outside. They play in a dome. Even if the Falcons win the SB they will get no respect for some reason. Just like I still hear that 98 was a fluke. Everyone is aware that they went 6-2 at the end of the 97 season right? right? A fluke my ass. Then they went 14-2 in 1998. So while Chandler and Jamal were healthy they racked up a record of 20-4 over a year and a half and went to a SB...but they both get hurt and the team goes to crap then it's a fluke.... Same sh-- Different Year.
SJ Bills backer Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 If the Broncos lose to the Chargers, I'm the Hurdy Gurdy Man. 138705[/snapback] Hudry gurdy hurdy gurdy hudry gurdy is saa - a- adddd Your words come back to haunt you - I'll tell you who's a fraud - Jake Plumber as a QB!!!
KurtGodel77 Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 The Chargers lost to the Colts and Seahawks in Preseason. If the Broncos lose to the Chargers, I'm the Hurdy Gurdy Man. Indy, Pgh, Denver, New England and The Jets (who have beaten the Chargers already) are all --still--better than the Chargers. Chargers = Fraud 138705[/snapback] How does it feel to be the Hurdy Gurdy Man?
Like A Mofo Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 The Bills. Seriously who have we beat? The Jets? Everyone else we've beat sucks. 150604[/snapback] So how about a team like the Vikings, any thoughts on them?
Dante Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 So how about a team like the Vikings, any thoughts on them? 150731[/snapback] Welcome to the new NFL. Mediocrity aka parity. A couple very good teams(Eagles/Pats) A whole bunch of half assed decent ones(ranging from the Colts to the Bills). Then 8 or so horrible teams(Dolphins, Browns etc).
Like A Mofo Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 Welcome to the new NFL. Mediocrity aka parity. A couple very good teams(Eagles/Pats) A whole bunch of half assed decent ones(ranging from the Colts to the Bills). Then 8 or so horrible teams(Dolphins, Browns etc). 150767[/snapback] Point is Minnesota has beaten only ONE TEAM over .500, but Im sure most dont consider them a fraud because of Mo$$ and Culpepper.
BB27 Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 I gotta vote for the PATS just because it's total BS that the Super Bowl chimps have basically the same schedule that we have. How do the chimps play Cleveland?????? I remember when the Second Best team for many years in a row (that would be the BILLS) had the second hardest schedule. I can understand having to play teams in your division twice, but come on, Cleveland?????? Oh yeah, did I say I hate tom brady?
Dan Gross Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 Point is Minnesota has beaten only ONE TEAM over .500, but Im sure most dont consider them a fraud because of Mo$$ and Culpepper. 150811[/snapback] Hey, the Steelers have only beaten two teams over .500 (are actually 2-1)...
ch19079 Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 oakland, jaguars, dolphins, dolphins, cardinals, 49ers, browns, bengals, seahawlks, rams. all suck. and how many did we win???
BuffOrange Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 I gotta vote for the PATS just because it's total BS that the Super Bowl chimps have basically the same schedule that we have. How do the chimps play Cleveland?????? I remember when the Second Best team for many years in a row (that would be the BILLS) had the second hardest schedule. I can understand having to play teams in your division twice, but come on, Cleveland?????? Oh yeah, did I say I hate tom brady? 150828[/snapback] The AFC East was assigned to play the AFC North.
Like A Mofo Posted December 7, 2004 Posted December 7, 2004 Hey, the Steelers have only beaten two teams over .500 (are actually 2-1)... 150833[/snapback] True, but they did beat the other 11-1 teams... I did call them a 'fraud' I do think they are a very good football team, but in NO way shape or form do I see them beating NE in a rematch.
(2).thumb.jpeg.6e78fe3142ec9e6bfedbf027610db26f.jpeg)
Recommended Posts