Jump to content

RUMORS: Lynch could land in GB

saundena

By saundena
in The Stadium Wall Archives

 Share

Recommended Posts

davefan66 Veteran

davefan66

Posted
Posted

What do we get for him? 5th next year? Player?

 

Would have liked to use him to have moved up or added a pick this year. Not

to say the Bills did not try.

LGB RFA

LGB

Posted
Posted

 

"I'm sure they'd be willing to take whatever at this point," a personnel director for a National Football League team said Friday. "They've got too many guys and they're trying to move him, but I don't know if there's much activity. He just doesn't want to be there. Just not a good situation."

 

Would the Bills have too many guys if Jackson or Spiller got hurt?

sabres...yawn Rookie

sabres...yawn

Posted
Posted
Why not just hold onto the meathead at this point. Isn't he up for a new contract next year? Maybe he'll be slightly motivated about that and play well.

 

 

Lynch in Green Bay?

 

Now there's a fit.

mary owen Veteran

mary owen

Posted
Posted
How about Lynch straight up for Clay Matthews Jr? lol

 

Buffalo will be lucky to get a 4th round pick next year for Lynch

 

which is exactly why he should remain on the team....he's a really good runningback, people seem to forget that.....hey, we have a good stable of backs, what's wrong with that?

Cash Veteran

Cash

Posted
Posted
which is exactly why he should remain on the team....he's a really good runningback, people seem to forget that.....hey, we have a good stable of backs, what's wrong with that?

 

+1. Sounds like they're planning on using Spiller on kicks & split wide around half the time anyway. So we've really got 2.5 backs, not 3. That's not really a logjam. Worked fine for the Saints last year & for the Giants in 2007. And the Raiders last year, actually. Bush, McFadden, & Fargas all split time and their overall running game was decent, even though the rest of the team was a shambles.

VanCity RFA

VanCity

Posted
Posted
He'll ride over fat Canadians with a John Deere tractor.

 

Why Canadians? He has a better chance of running them down when we visit Toronto or if he went to the Vikings. Not that many Canadians in Green Bay. Just saying....

Chalkie Gerzowski Veteran

Chalkie Gerzowski

Posted
Posted
Why Canadians? He has a better chance of running them down when we visit Toronto or if he went to the Vikings. Not that many Canadians in Green Bay. Just saying....

 

 

cause they like Wisconsin? Ok, how bout fat cheese-eating Wisconsinites?

 

:lol:

kasper13 Veteran

kasper13

Posted
Posted

If the Bills get anything at all for Lynch it is a bonus. I'd just cut him if they don't get a draft pick for him. Character issues aside, after the bye week last year, Lynch averaged less than 10 carries a game. Couple games he had less than 5. Now they add Spiller. Where exactly does Lynch fit in now? Why keep him around for 1-2 carries a game? Makes no sense. Now add in all his character issues and his unwillingness to show up for the OTA's (Yes, I know they are "voluntary") and it makes even less sense to keep him. Addition by subtraction. Sometimes you have to cut your losses. I don't think there is anyone who would be unhappy to see him go. Those of you with a Lynch jersey excluded. Throw it on top of the pile with your Losman and McGahee jerseys.

Max997 All Pro

Max997

Posted
Posted

there isnt anything wrong with having 3 good RBs especially when they can all catch and line at WR

 

the fact that they didnt draft another RB late tells me Lynch isnt going anywhere

 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...