MaineMoxie Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 I'm just thinking out loud here trying to rationalize why we would take Spiller in the first round with Fred and Marshawn on the team and (supposedly) not being interested in trading Marshawn. What if Gailey's thinking about some wildcat-like scheme where, on a chunk of the plays (not all, obviously), they go with Fred under center with Spiller in the backfield? Fred's done it before and had more TD passes than Brohm last year (1). Marshawn acts as backup or you could convert him to FB. It could explain the desire to have three RBs. Of course, it could also be that Ralphie is really calling the shots (which I believe) which have become seemingly more random over the years...
McBeane Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 I'm just thinking out loud here trying to rationalize why we would take Spiller in the first round with Fred and Marshawn on the team and (supposedly) not being interested in trading Marshawn. What if Gailey's thinking about some wildcat-like scheme where, on a chunk of the plays (not all, obviously), they go with Fred under center with Spiller in the backfield? Fred's done it before and had more TD passes than Brohm last year (1). Marshawn acts as backup or you could convert him to FB. It could explain the desire to have three RBs. Of course, it could also be that Ralphie is really calling the shots (which I believe) which have become seemingly more random over the years... Triple Option.
evilbuffalobob Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 These three on the field at the same time could create some confusion.
ntjacks79 Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 I'm just thinking out loud here trying to rationalize why we would take Spiller in the first round with Fred and Marshawn on the team and (supposedly) not being interested in trading Marshawn. What if Gailey's thinking about some wildcat-like scheme where, on a chunk of the plays (not all, obviously), they go with Fred under center with Spiller in the backfield? Fred's done it before and had more TD passes than Brohm last year (1). Marshawn acts as backup or you could convert him to FB. It could explain the desire to have three RBs. Of course, it could also be that Ralphie is really calling the shots (which I believe) which have become seemingly more random over the years... WHAT? Why in the HECK do you need to rationalize this pick? Talk to anyone that knows anything about this draft and they will tell you that C.J. Spiller is a rare talent... a combination of outstanding athleticism and results on the field. Similar to Sam Bradford. I think most would rank the best players in this draft as Bradford, Suh, Spiller... in that order. This pick FINALLY shows that someone at Bills Drive is understanding that winning in the NFL isn't about drafting for need or drafting for selling tickets, at least not in the 1st round. Now if Bradford were available, and the Bills took Spiller, I could see someone trying to rationalize why they did it. But at PICK NINE? The only rationalization you need for Spiller at 9 is that premium talent wins in the NFL... not plugging your holes with the best player available, even if sub-par to other players.
MaineMoxie Posted April 24, 2010 Author Posted April 24, 2010 WHAT? Why in the HECK do you need to rationalize this pick? Talk to anyone that knows anything about this draft and they will tell you that C.J. Spiller is a rare talent... a combination of outstanding athleticism and results on the field. Similar to Sam Bradford. I think most would rank the best players in this draft as Bradford, Suh, Spiller... in that order. This pick FINALLY shows that someone at Bills Drive is understanding that winning in the NFL isn't about drafting for need or drafting for selling tickets, at least not in the 1st round. Now if Bradford were available, and the Bills took Spiller, I could see someone trying to rationalize why they did it. But at PICK NINE? The only rationalization you need for Spiller at 9 is that premium talent wins in the NFL... not plugging your holes with the best player available, even if sub-par to other players. Winning in the NFL isn't about drafting for need???
dollars 2 donuts Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 I'm just thinking out loud here trying to rationalize why we would take Spiller in the first round with Fred and Marshawn on the team and (supposedly) not being interested in trading Marshawn. What if Gailey's thinking about some wildcat-like scheme where, on a chunk of the plays (not all, obviously), they go with Fred under center with Spiller in the backfield? Fred's done it before and had more TD passes than Brohm last year (1). Marshawn acts as backup or you could convert him to FB. It could explain the desire to have three RBs. Of course, it could also be that Ralphie is really calling the shots (which I believe) which have become seemingly more random over the years... I rationalize it one way; if we get a touchdown, or multiple tds (please) on opening day i guarantee that at least one of them will be scored by spiller & on this bills team that looks at scoring points the same way i look at Margaret Cho being a comedian, that's saying a lot.
Kelly the Dog Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 Winning in the NFL isn't about drafting for need??? It's actually about having a couple star players, surrounded by very good players, encased by no name role players, coached well. We have no stars. He could easily be a star.
Max997 Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 Spiller is the best offensive player in this draft and some would even say the best player in the draft...thats why they drafted him I cant wait to see him play
iinii Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 I'm just thinking out loud here trying to rationalize why we would take Spiller in the first round with Fred and Marshawn on the team and (supposedly) not being interested in trading Marshawn. What if Gailey's thinking about some wildcat-like scheme where, on a chunk of the plays (not all, obviously), they go with Fred under center with Spiller in the backfield? Fred's done it before and had more TD passes than Brohm last year (1). Marshawn acts as backup or you could convert him to FB. It could explain the desire to have three RBs. Of course, it could also be that Ralphie is really calling the shots (which I believe) which have become seemingly more random over the years... Beast is gone, his heart is not in it. I watch Chris Johnson all the time. IF Spiller is another C.J., then you take him.
BuckeyeBill Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 Spiller gives the Bills something they have been lacking... a playmaker. Has there been anyone you could count on to make plays? I think you can count on Spiller. He could very well be a faster Thurman Thomas.
RealityCheck Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 I'm just thinking out loud here trying to rationalize why we would take Spiller in the first round with Fred and Marshawn on the team and (supposedly) not being interested in trading Marshawn. What if Gailey's thinking about some wildcat-like scheme where, on a chunk of the plays (not all, obviously), they go with Fred under center with Spiller in the backfield? Fred's done it before and had more TD passes than Brohm last year (1). Marshawn acts as backup or you could convert him to FB. It could explain the desire to have three RBs. Of course, it could also be that Ralphie is really calling the shots (which I believe) which have become seemingly more random over the years... If you need to think about so much you might be better served thinking about something else.
birdog1960 Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 I'm just thinking out loud here trying to rationalize why we would take Spiller in the first round with Fred and Marshawn on the team and (supposedly) not being interested in trading Marshawn. What if Gailey's thinking about some wildcat-like scheme where, on a chunk of the plays (not all, obviously), they go with Fred under center with Spiller in the backfield? Fred's done it before and had more TD passes than Brohm last year (1). Marshawn acts as backup or you could convert him to FB. It could explain the desire to have three RBs. Of course, it could also be that Ralphie is really calling the shots (which I believe) which have become seemingly more random over the years... ralphie
Guest dog14787 Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 CJ Spiller scored over 50 TD's in 4 years averaging more then a TD a game. The kid can run for TD's, catch for TD's, return for TD's( and he even threw for TD's.) CJ Spiller is Gaileys dream come true kinda player and Gailey is going to turn Spiller into one of the best scoring machines the Bills have ever seen in my opinion. I'm real excited about Spiller
CodeMonkey Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 These three on the field at the same time could create some confusion. Yeah I suppose it could confuse the people watching on TV making them think there are watching a "vintage" college football game. And it might confuse the defense trying to decide if the Bills are going to run, or throw a screen.
MaineMoxie Posted April 24, 2010 Author Posted April 24, 2010 If you need to think about so much you might be better served thinking about something else. Yeah, like how to get the image of your avatar out of my head...
DrFishfinder Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 I'm just thinking out loud here trying to rationalize why we would take Spiller in the first round with Fred and Marshawn on the team and (supposedly) not being interested in trading Marshawn. What if Gailey's thinking about some wildcat-like scheme where, on a chunk of the plays (not all, obviously), they go with Fred under center with Spiller in the backfield? Fred's done it before and had more TD passes than Brohm last year (1). Marshawn acts as backup or you could convert him to FB. It could explain the desire to have three RBs. Of course, it could also be that Ralphie is really calling the shots (which I believe) which have become seemingly more random over the years... 'Cause every time CJ touches the ball, it is a potential to kick a PAT. That's why.
RealityCheck Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 Yeah, like how to get the image of your avatar out of my head... WWWWWHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
San Jose Bills Fan Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 These three on the field at the same time could create some confusion. For the offense or the defense? JK, I love the pick. Love the whole draft.
MaineMoxie Posted April 24, 2010 Author Posted April 24, 2010 But what about some kind of wildcat/triple option? I wasn't completely kidding. Would it work? Or is the NFL too conservative to try something crazy like that?
zow2 Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 Thank god they took Spiller. Not only is he an awesome player, he added some sizzle to a really boring, meat and potatoes type draft for the Bills. Hopefully they got some future stars.
Recommended Posts