Steely Dan Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 The link at NFL.com doesn't work yet but it's on the front page http://www.nfl.com/
KD in CA Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 ESPN said Lynch was Seattle's first choice but went to Plan B when the Bills turned down the trade offer.
34-78-83 Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 It looks like the Bills really want to run the ball. Alot of the good running teams (Bal, Dal, Min now) have 3 good backs.
TheMadCap Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 And they just picked up Leon Washington from the Jests...
Max997 Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 there isnt anything wrong with having 3 solid backs that can run the ball i hated the thinking of the last regime carrying two RBs and thats it...Dallas has 3 really good backs that all get on on the field if you are good enough at running the ball there will be a place for all 3 and its not like they are going to rush Spiller into the starting lineup this year so why not keep Lynch all 3 backs can catch the ball and we've seen Jackson lineup at receiver and Im sure we'll see Spiller lineup up there as well
LGB Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 there isnt anything wrong with having 3 solid backs that can run the ball i hated the thinking of the last regime carrying two RBs and thats it...Dallas has 3 really good backs that all get on on the field if you are good enough at running the ball there will be a place for all 3 and its not like they are going to rush Spiller into the starting lineup this year so why not keep Lynch all 3 backs can catch the ball and we've seen Jackson lineup at receiver and Im sure we'll see Spiller lineup up there as well right, it's not like RBs don't ever get injured...
Recommended Posts