SawchukBills Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 What do you guys think? Who would have thought that ALL THREE would have lasted to pick 22?
BuffaloBillsMagic1 Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 What do you guys think? Who would have thought that ALL THREE would have lasted to pick 22? Agree, go 4 it
Phlegm Alley Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 Considering it only cost the Eagles 2 3rd rounders to get up to the 13th pick, I think it may be a good idea.
apuszczalowski Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 I don't know, guys are falling for a reason, some of these surprises allow some good guys to fall to Buffalo in round 2
lets_go_bills Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 We need all of our picks, can't afford to trade them. I say we wait and see who is there at 41. Someone good will fall. It could be Saffold, Tebow, Williams, Hughes. This is a deep draft. Very deep.
SawchukBills Posted April 23, 2010 Author Posted April 23, 2010 I don't know, guys are falling for a reason, some of these surprises allow some good guys to fall to Buffalo in round 2 Guess the real question is what would it cost?
Phlegm Alley Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 I don't know, guys are falling for a reason, some of these surprises allow some good guys to fall to Buffalo in round 2 Aaron Rodgers fell as well. Not saying they all pan out, but some because of a lack of need.
Alaska Darin Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 Who would have thought that ALL THREE would have lasted to pick 22? Buddy Nix.
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 I don't know, guys are falling for a reason, some of these surprises allow some good guys to fall to Buffalo in round 2 I agree with you. At this rate, if we can't get any takers for Lynch, just sit tight and we'll get a good player at 41.
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 Buddy Nix. But I thought he wasn't the smartest guy in the world.
LGB Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 I agree with you. At this rate, if we can't get any takers for Lynch, just sit tight and we'll get a good player at 41. The Bills are probably fine having three starting RBs...run and stop the run...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 The Bills are probably fine having three starting RBs...run and stop the run... Maybe we can put all three out there, huh? A little option offense? I mean, Chan'd just LOVE that. Hell, why not draft Tebow then we can have a 4-RB offense? It'll be revolutionary!
Casey D Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 Maybe we can put all three out there, huh? A little option offense? I mean, Chan'd just LOVE that. Hell, why not draft Tebow then we can have a 4-RB offense? It'll be revolutionary! Who would you have taken instead of Spiller?
billsfaningeneseo Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 I wouldn't mind coming up to get Dan Williams right about now. Let our 3 QBs fight it out, and if needed go high at QB next year.
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 Who would you have taken instead of Spiller? You can please some of the people some of the time.....
DonInBuffalo Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 I agree with you. At this rate, if we can't get any takers for Lynch, just sit tight and we'll get a good player at 41.Now at pick 28, and none of the teams left in the 1st round would appear to have enough need at RB to have any interest in Lynch
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 Now at pick 28, and none of the teams left in the 1st round would appear to have enough need at RB to have any interest in Lynch There hasn't been much of a market for veteran RB's recently.
buffaloaggie Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 It would take a swap of our 2nd and a swap of our 3rd round pick for theirs to get the Colts #31 pick according to the draft value chart.
Recommended Posts