Lintyfresh85 Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 Would love to land this guy in a draft day trade. Maybe 3rd or 4th round pick? Anyone know if he's still on the team's radar?
/dev/null Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 I doubt Campbell goes for anything higher than a 4th. That said, considering that the 4th round is on Saturday, there won't be any news until Saturday morning
CosmicBills Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 Why? He's no better than any of the three QBs we already have. And that's saying something because the ones we have are pretty damn awful.
Lintyfresh85 Posted April 22, 2010 Author Posted April 22, 2010 Why? He's no better than any of the three QBs we already have. And that's saying something because the ones we have are pretty damn awful. I disagree. Campbell has actually had some NFL success. None of our three QB's can say that.
CosmicBills Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 I disagree. Campbell has actually had some NFL success. None of our three QB's can say that. How many playoff games did he win again? Oh yeah. That's right. On a team that had great coaching and a front office willing to spend, spend, spend. He's a scrub. Pass.
bkc Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 How many playoff games did he win again? Oh yeah. That's right. On a team that had great coaching and a front office willing to spend, spend, spend. He's a scrub. Pass. campbell for a 5th is fine . He is better then anything we have by a long shot
CosmicBills Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 campbell for a 5th is fine . He is better then anything we have by a long shot That's like saying you'd rather have a cold than the flu. Taking Cambell would let the front office think they're "okay" at the QB position for another 3 years. And we will spend another 3 years being the laughing stock of the leauge. No thanks.
bkc Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 That's like saying you'd rather have a cold than the flu. Taking Cambell would let the front office think they're "okay" at the QB position for another 3 years. And we will spend another 3 years being the laughing stock of the leauge. No thanks. why would they think that . If he sucks they move on , If Chan can develop him all the better
apuszczalowski Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 That's like saying you'd rather have a cold than the flu. Taking Cambell would let the front office think they're "okay" at the QB position for another 3 years. And we will spend another 3 years being the laughing stock of the leauge. No thanks. When you currently have the flu, having a cold is a step up and much more pleasant.
CosmicBills Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 why would they think that . If he sucks they move on , If Chan can develop him all the better If they invest a draft pick and contract extension in him (which is how it would happen), then they'd be FORCED to keep him locked in for 3 years. It's always about the money.
bkc Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 If they invest a draft pick and contract extension in him (which is how it would happen), then they'd be FORCED to keep him locked in for 3 years. It's always about the money. depends on how they structure the contract or if they even offer him an extension. They may both agree to play it out and see
CosmicBills Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 depends on how they structure the contract or if they even offer him an extension. They may both agree to play it out and see You're crazy. Why would the Bills let that happen? Risk having him have a great year (which he wouldn't but you have to manage risks) and letting him walk in Free Agency? No way.
bkc Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 You're crazy. Why would the Bills let that happen? Risk having him have a great year (which he wouldn't but you have to manage risks) and letting him walk in Free Agency? No way. they can still sign him later you can not have it both ways it is a gamble eitehr way
CosmicBills Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 they can still sign him later you can not have it both ways it is a gamble eitehr way No it's not. That's the point. Campbell is no good. He's proven it on the field. Over and over again. So gambling that we can "fix" him is retarded. I'd rather take a gamble on a rookie than on Campbell. At least then you have a SHOT at getting the franchise QB this team desperately needs.
Max997 Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 I would imagine if Campbell is traded it will be late friday early saturday
Recommended Posts