DC Tom Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 I can't recall any violent Quaker or Amish extremists, but maybe you can dig up a few. They would be, of course, grouped under the generic label of "Christian". As would Methodists, Baptists, Greek Orthodox, Anglicans, Puritans, Nestorians, etc. I don't see anyone claiming Islam is violent qualifying excepting the Sufis or Ijdihads...so in this context, I'll continue with the generalization.
Jim in Anchorage Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 Like the Air Force? So you feel the US air force is engaged in terrorism?
The Dean Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 Driving a horse and buggy into the WTC would not have generated much interest. I see you aren't really familiar with Quakers.
Jim in Anchorage Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 I see you aren't really familiar with Quakers. All I know is they Quake a lot. All I need to know.
Chef Jim Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 So you feel the US air force is engaged in terrorism?
Jim in Anchorage Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 Make a point. It makes the story so much more interesting to the reader.
Chef Jim Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 Make a point. It makes the story so much more interesting to the reader. You really think that was the point Tom was making?
Jim in Anchorage Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 Islamic wackos just get more press. You think Scott Roeder is any less whacked in the head? Islam is a religion of peace, just like Christianity is a religion of tolerance. The real problem is that both religions need to be rescued from their followers. I would expect a world wide organization that routinely kills hundreds of people at a time with explosives would get more attention then a lone gunman. When you follow that- Like the Air Force? With this, no I don't get the point at all. Is the US air force to be compared to a religious terrorist organization? You really think that was the point Tom was making?
Lockport Bills Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 I watched tonight's episode. They bleeped out Muhammad's name every time. So annoying.
billsfan89 Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 Muslims always seem to want people to view their religion as non-violent and yet they have advocate groups that threaten violence for a depiction of Muhammad in a cartoon that frequently bashes other religion. I would really hope that there are other Muslim groups out there that go out and support South Park because they need to join in on the joke rather then have themselves be perceived as those who will threaten violence over a joke. I love South Park and loved the 200th episode. It was great that they broached their subject again and brought back officer Barbrady.
The Dean Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 All I know is they Quake a lot. All I need to know. Well, there you have it.
Jim in Anchorage Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 Well, there you have it. It can seem rather threating
LeviF Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 Thought this was slightly relevant: http://amorphia-apparel.com/design/stick/
shrader Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 I watched tonight's episode. They bleeped out Muhammad's name every time. So annoying. I tried to catch the midnight re-airing but they showed the Scrotie McBoogerballs episode again. I wonder if that was just a screw up or comedy central completely pulled the episode.
/dev/null Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 and brought back officer Barbrady. And Scott Tenorman
The Dean Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 I tried to catch the midnight re-airing but they showed the Scrotie McBoogerballs episode again. I wonder if that was just a screw up or comedy central completely pulled the episode. Same here. I missed the 10PM start due to the Sabres game. Thought I would catch it at Midnight.
shrader Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 Same here. I missed the 10PM start due to the Sabres game. Thought I would catch it at Midnight. And there is a disclaimer on the South Park website saying that Comedy Central won't let them stream the episode online right now until they get it into an acceptable form. I have a bad feeling that I will never get to watch that episode.
Chef Jim Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 And there is a disclaimer on the South Park website saying that Comedy Central won't let them stream the episode online right now until they get it into an acceptable form. I have a bad feeling that I will never get to watch that episode. Why are we now censoring things we never censored before just because a group of people are offended by it? I'm offended by bad TV and I know I'm not alone here but they don't censor that? Well I guess if they did there would be no TV at all.
shrader Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 Why are we now censoring things we never censored before just because a group of people are offended by it? I'm offended by bad TV and I know I'm not alone here but they don't censor that? Well I guess if they did there would be no TV at all. Censorship for no reason other than fear. Are you good with explosives? If you bomb the network headquarters because of all their crappy shows, they just might start censoring bad shows. Does anyone know if they ever re-air the Super Best Friends episode? If they do, have they now censored Muhammed out of that one?
elcrusho Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 Censorship for no reason other than fear. Are you good with explosives? If you bomb the network headquarters because of all their crappy shows, they just might start censoring bad shows. Does anyone know if they ever re-air the Super Best Friends episode? If they do, have they now censored Muhammed out of that one? I just watched that episode on southparkstudios.com a couple weeks ago and it wasn't censored
Recommended Posts