whateverdude Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 Oh my god! how can anyone watch NBC news anymore especially the morning show. Puff after puff on the Obamas and Dems and slam after slam on Palin and the Rep. even in their "hard news" stories. How embarrassing for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 Only Fox carries a bias. Shut up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 Oh my god! how can anyone watch NBC news anymore especially the morning show. Puff after puff on the Obamas and Dems and slam after slam on Palin and the Rep. even in their "hard news" stories. How embarrassing for them. Listen, it's all they got. They are losing in the court of public opinion in every single substantive matter. Health Care FAIL. Stimulus FAIL. Handling of KSM FAIL. Deficit Spending FAIL. Job creation FAIL. Tickling of staffers KA-CHING!!!! so when you got nothin, the easiest target is PALIN. Meanwhile she's making millions, slamming the pres, smiling and laughing at the expense of the libs. God bless her Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 I *WANT* to not like Palin. The screechy voice, the shallowness of her knowledge, etc. But as long as she makes Libs and the media at large her little dogs doing their flips and yapping every time she says "jump", she remains.....AWESOME. For example, there's nothing like watching an elitist c-nt like Mika Brzchnistytytrdzxvc, with her coiffed hair and Cronkite wanna-be temperment lose all composure, drop her eyes and seethe right on TV just at the mere mention of Palin's name. Its entertainment gold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 I *WANT* to not like Palin. The screechy voice, the shallowness of her knowledge, etc. But as long as she makes Libs and the media at large her little dogs doing their flips and yapping every time she says "jump", she remains.....AWESOME. For example, there's nothing like watching an elitist c-nt like Mika Brzchnistytytrdzxvc, with her coiffed hair and Cronkite wanna-be temperment lose all composure, drop her eyes and seethe right on TV just at the mere mention of Palin's name. Its entertainment gold. Palin isn't Presidential material, but her guiding principles are great. She's got nothing ot lose by calling out the libs and yes, she drives them crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 I *WANT* to not like Palin. The screechy voice, That right there is enough for me. She's !@#$ing horrible. She sounds like a cross between my mother and a cat hung by it's tail scratching against a pane of glass with its claws. But I hasten to add: I'd still hit it. As long as she didn't say anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 Palin isn't Presidential material, but her guiding principles are great. She's got nothing ot lose by calling out the libs and yes, she drives them crazy. She got her guiding principles from David Hannum (look it up). Be careful what you wish for. If she continues to garner the spotlight at the expense of other Republicans like Romney and Gingrich, she could very well end up as the Republican nominee in 2012. And that would be great (for Obama). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 She got her guiding principles from David Hannum (look it up). Be careful what you wish for. If she continues to garner the spotlight at the expense of other Republicans like Romney and Gingrich, she could very well end up as the Republican nominee in 2012. And that would be great (for Obama). Oh the agony of a decision in that case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 That right there is enough for me. She's !@#$ing horrible. She sounds like a cross between my mother and a cat hung by it's tail scratching against a pane of glass with its claws. But I hasten to add: I'd still hit it. As long as she didn't say anything. Palin is more a reality TV star than a politician. She's a talking head that regurgitates whatever points gets the crowd excited. While I certainly agree with less gov't involvement, and less spending, I wish this woman would just keep her mouth shut. ** I'd still hit it as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 She got her guiding principles from David Hannum (look it up). Be careful what you wish for. If she continues to garner the spotlight at the expense of other Republicans like Romney and Gingrich, she could very well end up as the Republican nominee in 2012. And that would be great (for Obama). I don't know about that. First, I agree with most here that Palin is, well, Palin. However, as I have said before, all the media has been doing since day 1 is attacking her. They are very rapidly running out of bad things to say about her: what's left? They have already hit her family, experience, being a hick, knowledge, etc....and yet she remains. Perhaps screechingly annoying as ever...but also, as effective as ever in terms of her message. This has happened before with Reagan. The "Great Communicator" was only given that title AFTER he had been able to consistently refute/ignore/marginalize the constant liberal media attacks on him. That title was their white flag. And they gave him that title...because, after all, it wasn't what he said that made sense, or, the fact that the ideas they espouse don't, it's just that he was so good at saying it. And of course it couldn't be that they simply failed miserably...nah, they were up against a superstar...so that's why they lost. I am therefore not so quick to call her a bad thing. How is Obama supposed to run against her exactly? Call her names? Say that she doesn't know what she's doing? Sorry, that's already been done. Frankly, an Obama/Palin campaign would put all of the focus on Obama...not Palin...and given his current performance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 I don't know about that. First, I agree with most here that Palin is, well, Palin. However, as I have said before, all the media has been doing since day 1 is attacking her. They are very rapidly running out of bad things to say about her: what's left? They have already hit her family, experience, being a hick, knowledge, etc....and yet she remains. Perhaps screechingly annoying as ever...but also, as effective as ever in terms of her message. Paris Hilton's still hanging around, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 So is Octomom. Maybe Barry's right...this Country sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 She got her guiding principles from David Hannum (look it up). Be careful what you wish for. If she continues to garner the spotlight at the expense of other Republicans like Romney and Gingrich, she could very well end up as the Republican nominee in 2012. And that would be great (for Obama). My dream is her as the Republican nominee and Obama struggling. Then we'd see many people flocking to a third party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 So is Octomom. And Phil Harris is dead. Life just isn't fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 My dream is her as the Republican nominee and Obama struggling. Then we'd see many people flocking to a third party. If that happens, buy stock in booze makers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 Oh the agony of a decision in that case. You do know there will be more than just two candidates, right? I just question the will of this country- it ain't what it used to was...... Oh my god! how can anyone watch NBC news anymore especially the morning show. Puff after puff on the Obamas and Dems and slam after slam on Palin and the Rep. even in their "hard news" stories. How embarrassing for them. I find it amazing how often people in this country watch things they hate...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 And Phil Harris is dead. Life just isn't fair. And Pete Steele died today. UGH...... I was not thrilled with that first episode. I know everyobdy knows Harris passed, but they should have at least acknowledged it. I expected at least Mike Rowe to maybe make a short statement.....something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 And Pete Steele died today. UGH...... I remember seeing Type O in concert back in the mid 90s when they opened for Pantera Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 You do know there will be more than just two candidates, right? I just question the will of this country- it ain't what it used to was...... Sorry, I was kidding around. I plan to vote against all incumbents for a while. I want to at least try to fire my bit of the lot. I will vote for a 3rd party candidate in the 2012 election (as I have the last two) for the President barring a major change of some sort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 15, 2010 Share Posted April 15, 2010 And Pete Steele died today. UGH...... I have no idea who he is. Is he related to Remington? I was not thrilled with that first episode. I know everyobdy knows Harris passed, but they should have at least acknowledged it. I expected at least Mike Rowe to maybe make a short statement.....something. Respectfully, I disagree. I think everyone who watches the show knows he's passed, and stating something up front would have been not just needlessly redundant but needlessly maudlin. They don't really need an upfront statement of "These are Phil's last days, God bless..." Hell, the whole point of the show is that these guys are living on the edge, and you could be watching the last days of any one of them; it avoids such mawkish sentiment for that very reason. And...but much of the scenes/clips of Harris in that episode were rather life-affirming (which I personally felt was done tastefully and with appropriate subtlety). Never mind the foreshadowing aspect of it (which is, again, redundant)...as a simple portrayal of the man's good nature and joie de vivre, it was a better tribute than any up-front statement could have been. It was a seriously well-done bit of work on the production staff's part (editors in particular), and I expect (hope) they'll continue the episodes in the same theme this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts