BobbyC81 Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 If they truly can get Gaithier for a 2nd and J.Campbell for a 4th, I believe that is the way to go. Then they can use the 1st pick on the Best Available player.
earthtobrint Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 If they truly can get Gaithier for a 2nd and J.Campbell for a 4th, I believe that is the way to go. Then they can use the 1st pick on the Best Available player. I agree on Gaither but not as much on Campbell. Unfortunately, a 4th wouldn't be enough for Campbell and I don't think the Ravens actually want to trade their starting LT for a 2nd.
WannabeGM Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 Hat about a swap of firsts and a third for gaither?
silvermike Posted April 8, 2010 Posted April 8, 2010 I think Gaither is off the board - the story seems to be that it was all just to put some pressure on Gaither to get to camp.
oak tree 12 Posted April 9, 2010 Posted April 9, 2010 If they truly can get Gaithier for a 2nd and J.Campbell for a 4th, I believe that is the way to go. Then they can use the 1st pick on the Best Available player. why are the ravens willing to let a young starting LT go? that is the big question. i believe if the tackles the bills covet are gone @ 9 then they may pursue the BPA and look to giving our second up to get gaither. or in the unlikely event that the bills like clausen(which i dont think the do especially @ 9) then the may also give up our second to the ravens! we shall see!
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted April 9, 2010 Posted April 9, 2010 On Sirius NFL today they implied a 5th would get Campbell I say if thats the case pull the trigger
San Jose Bills Fan Posted April 9, 2010 Posted April 9, 2010 I wouldn't mind a 5th. I wouldn't mind a 5th either...a 5th of Jack Daniels.
Recommended Posts