John from Riverside Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 To me they are both players in need of a change of scenery.....and needs for both teams. Both players have been pretty much rendered no needed by their current teams. I dont want to give up draft picks.
BuffaloRebound Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 To me they are both players in need of a change of scenery.....and needs for both teams. Both players have been pretty much rendered no needed by their current teams. I dont want to give up draft picks. Give them Edwards. Whitner has more value than Campbell.
Haven Moses Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 To me they are both players in need of a change of scenery.....and needs for both teams. Both players have been pretty much rendered no needed by their current teams. I dont want to give up draft picks. I'd be all for it. Would depend on how many years Whitner has left on his contract.
Ever Since '86 Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 I want to see his role in the new defense first.
Bob in STL Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 To me they are both players in need of a change of scenery.....and needs for both teams. Both players have been pretty much rendered no needed by their current teams. I dont want to give up draft picks. No. Whitner is a very good player. I see Campbell as a journeyman QB at best.
K-Gun10 Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 A for sure Starter on this team, for someone competing for a job?Absolutly i do this trade
Mike in Horseheads Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 NOT! We never have enough DB's and whos to say a new scheme and coaches can't revive Whitner. He's one of the few players on the team that actually spoke up once in a while. Edwards for Campbell is acceptable, and I'm not sure the Bills are any better off.
Maddog69 Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 Give them Edwards. Whitner has more value than Campbell. Give them Whitner and Edwards. Just to get rid of Edwards.
r00tabaga Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 I want to see his role in the new defense first. +1
BillsfaninSixburgh Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 To me they are both players in need of a change of scenery.....and needs for both teams. Both players have been pretty much rendered no needed by their current teams. I dont want to give up draft picks. Definitely Not. Each players respective current status: Starting DB for a backup QB. Maybe Whitner does need a change a scenery, but this trade would have to include something else. I wouldn't do it straight up.
muffmonster Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 NOT! We never have enough DB's and whos to say a new scheme and coaches can't revive Whitner. He's one of the few players on the team that actually spoke up once in a while. Edwards for Campbell is acceptable, and I'm not sure the Bills are any better off. Campbell does not get injured every time he is hit (which is a lot) and his stats have improved every year he has played. This is the polar opposite of Edwards, so yes we would be better off with Campbell.
Lucien K Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 No, to repeat either Nix or Gailey, why would you take one of the few positions of strength on the team, Safety, and turn it into a weakness. People get hurt every year. Jason Campbell is alright but even with living in the DC area the last 4 years, and having watched the parade of Head Coaches and Coordinators that have not helped him develop or experience any consistency, he is still only a good quarterback at best. You need a great quarterback to win, of which there are few. I say try Clausen at #9 if he's there, otherwise best LT, trade down, or LB.
BYGD1 Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 To me they are both players in need of a change of scenery.....and needs for both teams. Both players have been pretty much rendered no needed by their current teams. I dont want to give up draft picks. I would never "DO" Whitner I would however trade him for a Bottle of milk
stuckincincy Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 To me they are both players in need of a change of scenery.....and needs for both teams. Both players have been pretty much rendered no needed by their current teams. No.
PDaDdy Posted April 6, 2010 Posted April 6, 2010 Where do I sign?!?!!??!?! In all seriousness. Would I be happy with that trade hell ya. Do I think we could do even better than just a straight up trade? Yes. We would be giving them something for nothing. They don't want or need Campbell. He means nothing to them. The only reasons they would keep him is to screw him over, losing a year on the bench and then they would STILL get nothing for him next year when he is a free agent I assume. If they had any class they would just release him and let the guy find a job before the draft. Another problem I see developing is if we get Campbell we eliminate one of our options in the draft which is taking Claussen if 4 OTs are drafted before us scenario.
John from Riverside Posted April 6, 2010 Author Posted April 6, 2010 thats a turd for a turd Thats debatable......but even if it were true...it would be a trade for a turd at a needed position.
Recommended Posts