Buffaloed in Pa Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 I hope not. I could see us picking him up . Skins will no doubt shop him around. Somebody`s reject to us ? Just say NO.
C.Biscuit97 Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 Campbell has improved every year in the league and it's not like the Skins have been a steady team. The mcNabb trade was a good one for them and they had to do it. But if Campbell was available cheap (a 5th or so), I'd definitely take a flyer on him. Unless they are 100% sold on Clausen (and I'm not), I would rather get some quality big guys in a draft loaded with them than take a QB at #9 in one of the worst QBs classes in a long time.
SawchukBills Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 Campbell has improved every year in the league and it's not like the Skins have been a steady team. The mcNabb trade was a good one for them and they had to do it. But if Campbell was available cheap (a 5th or so), I'd definitely take a flyer on him. Unless they are 100% sold on Clausen (and I'm not), I would rather get some quality big guys in a draft loaded with them than take a QB at #9 in one of the worst QBs classes in a long time. 5th? heck yes!
Buffaloed in Pa Posted April 5, 2010 Author Posted April 5, 2010 Campbell has improved every year in the league and it's not like the Skins have been a steady team. The mcNabb trade was a good one for them and they had to do it. But if Campbell was available cheap (a 5th or so), I'd definitely take a flyer on him. Unless they are 100% sold on Clausen (and I'm not), I would rather get some quality big guys in a draft loaded with them than take a QB at #9 in one of the worst QBs classes in a long time. He has improved so much that Shanny says no way does this guy lead my team. You think Trent`s a dink and dunker wait till you get a look at Campbell.
Acantha Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 Campbell has improved every year in the league and it's not like the Skins have been a steady team. The mcNabb trade was a good one for them and they had to do it. But if Campbell was available cheap (a 5th or so), I'd definitely take a flyer on him. Unless they are 100% sold on Clausen (and I'm not), I would rather get some quality big guys in a draft loaded with them than take a QB at #9 in one of the worst QBs classes in a long time. I feel the same way. I would take Campbell for a 5th in a second and let him come in as the 4th QB and compete for the starting job. Certainly not the long term QB answer, but decent stop-gap while we take the time to straighten the lines out.
Rob's House Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 Pass, I prefer the pale skinned version of Trent Edwards.
muggins Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 NO NO NO NO. It is really sad that Bills fans are even happy that McNabb is in DC so we might get Campbell.
VADC Bills Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 He has improved so much that Shanny says no way does this guy lead my team. You think Trent`s a dink and dunker wait till you get a look at Campbell. I wouldn't necessarily label Campbell as a dink and dunker. He does throw one helluva 30 yard incompletion. He also is a great fumbler... but calling him a dink and dunker is so one dimensional. Campbell would be a solid #2 behind McNabb. I think he stays in DC.
Buffaloed in Pa Posted April 5, 2010 Author Posted April 5, 2010 Pass, I prefer the pale skinned version of Trent Edwards. You got that right
bkc Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 Pass, I prefer the pale skinned version of Trent Edwards. campbell is tougher , with a bigger arm IF the Bills get him for a 5th they should be thrilled
NewEra Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 he's a much better qb than anyone on our roster. fosho
1B4IDie Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 I feel the same way. I would take Campbell for a 5th in a second and let him come in as the 4th QB and compete for the starting job. Certainly not the long term QB answer, but decent stop-gap while we take the time to straighten the lines out. I live in DC. I am forced to see(not watch) Redskins games and coverage. That O-Line was worse than ours with almost just as bad the amount of injuries. I am not a Campbell fan, I think Ronnie Brown and Cadillac Williams made his career. Those were his backfield in college anyone can look great with those dudes toting the ball behind you. But Trading a 2010 4th and a conditional 2011 would not be a horrible idea. If the Bills know they are passing on Clausen, then you're decision is do you want Pike, LeFevour or some other scrubbier "developmental" QB or Campbell. It could make sense but I believe Campbell is a restricted free agent and he was only tendered a 1 year deal with 1st and 3rd compensatory picks if another team signs him. Meaning no way anyone signs Campbell until the redskins rescind the offer. I'm not sure if they can just change the compensatory part and just say "Um, we mean a 4th." Either way the Bills would have to work a deal with Campbell before finializing the trade. This means a signing bonus atleast a 3 year deal. So do you want Pike/LeFevour/notherScrub or Campbell for 3 years 12 Million? I just talked myself out of the Campbell deal.
Rob's House Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 he's a much better qb than anyone on our roster. fosho His stats are better than he is. I'd rather have TE who throws three yd passes all game long, but might give you a fighting chance in the final drive, than Jason Campbell who shines when the game is out of reach and sucks when it's on the line. I live in VA where Redskin talk dominates the airwaves and most Redskin fans wanted Todd Collins to start b/c his stretch when Campbell was injured was the best stretch the Redskins have had during Campbell's time there.
1B4IDie Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 I double checked Campbell is a Restricted Free Agent, with 1st and 3rd tag. http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/playerpag...NFL&id=3137 The Deadskins most likely will have to change that tag and rotoworld seems to think that they can .
Celtic_soulja Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 I live in DC. I am forced to see(not watch) Redskins games and coverage. That O-Line was worse than ours with almost just as bad the amount of injuries. I am not a Campbell fan, I think Ronnie Brown and Cadillac Williams made his career. Those were his backfield in college anyone can look great with those dudes toting the ball behind you. But Trading a 2010 4th and a conditional 2011 would not be a horrible idea. If the Bills know they are passing on Clausen, then you're decision is do you want Pike, LeFevour or some other scrubbier "developmental" QB or Campbell. It could make sense but I believe Campbell is a restricted free agent and he was only tendered a 1 year deal with 1st and 3rd compensatory picks if another team signs him. Meaning no way anyone signs Campbell until the redskins rescind the offer. I'm not sure if they can just change the compensatory part and just say "Um, we mean a 4th." Either way the Bills would have to work a deal with Campbell before finializing the trade. This means a signing bonus atleast a 3 year deal. So do you want Pike/LeFevour/notherScrub or Campbell for 3 years 12 Million? I just talked myself out of the Campbell deal. I'mma have to go notherScrub on this one...Armanti or Skelton...Campbell sucks...I like Edwards over any of them...
bkc Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 he's a much better qb than anyone on our roster. fosho I agree
silvermike Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 It's pretty likely that Campbell will be a UFA by 2011 - he'll likely sign his RFA tender, play out the year on the bench, then go seek his fortune. So it might set him up for minimal trade value, or we could just wait a year and see where we are.
BobbyC81 Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 I hope not. I could see us picking him up . Skins will no doubt shop him around. Somebody`s reject to us ? Just say NO. Campbell's 2009 stats: Passing Rushing Sacked Fumbles G QBRat Comp Att Pct Yds Y/G Y/A TD Int Rush Yds Y/G Avg TD Sack YdsL Fum FumL 16 86.4 327 507 64.5 3618 226.1 7.1 20 15 46 236 14.8 5.1 1 43 285 11 3 A lot better than what the Bills have had for the past 3 seasons
benderbender Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 Yeah we totally need a QB beat out by Rex Grossman for backup
gizmo6824 Posted April 5, 2010 Posted April 5, 2010 ohh god no...! i'd hate that pick up. i dont see why all these fans r so enamored by some other teams trash. why is it everytime a team disgards some one, a bunch of fans wants to sign them. hell i even saw some posts about bulger and who was the other one i saw, ohh ya culpper! r u serious people? r we that desperate? i hope not....lol
Recommended Posts