Nevergiveup Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 All... Don't have much, but I hate to leave everyone hanging. It will not be Clausen at 9. Bradford is the only QB that they would take there and he will obviously be gone. I guess they could always take him later in the draft. There is interest in McNabb, but the new regime places such a high value on draft picks, it is not likely to happen. OT is still the leader in the club house for the pick. I don't like to make predictions, I would rather give information. However since I have been asked, I think Trent is your likely starter next year. That is just based on some things I have heard and my knowledge of the situation. However as many have pointed out, it is way too early for any type of certainty.
Arkady Renko Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Thanks, friend. Whether Trent is the starter or not on opening day, is there a good chance of at least bringing in a new QB to compete with the other 3?
DrFishfinder Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Looking more like OL for 1st pick and possibly a QB in round 2 or so.
H2o Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 All... Don't have much, but I hate to leave everyone hanging. It will not be Clausen at 9. Bradford is the only QB that they would take there and he will obviously be gone. I guess they could always take him later in the draft. There is interest in McNabb, but the new regime places such a high value on draft picks, it is not likely to happen. OT is still the leader in the club house for the pick. I don't like to make predictions, I would rather give information. However since I have been asked, I think Trent is your likely starter next year. That is just based on some things I have heard and my knowledge of the situation. However as many have pointed out, it is way too early for any type of certainty. Well........You just shot down my new avatar, but one can still hope.
FluffHead Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Well........You just shot down my new avatar, but one can still hope. mine too
Cotton Fitzsimmons Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 All... Don't have much, but I hate to leave everyone hanging. It will not be Clausen at 9. Bradford is the only QB that they would take there and he will obviously be gone. I guess they could always take him later in the draft. There is interest in McNabb, but the new regime places such a high value on draft picks, it is not likely to happen. OT is still the leader in the club house for the pick. I don't like to make predictions, I would rather give information. However since I have been asked, I think Trent is your likely starter next year. That is just based on some things I have heard and my knowledge of the situation. However as many have pointed out, it is way too early for any type of certainty. As always, thank you very much for your information, it is much appreciated my friend.
Astrobot Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 I'm looking at this from an available players point of view, and taking McNabb with a 2nd this year would mean having to really stick to our needs for the other picks--LT, NT, DE, WR, OLB, ILB, RT. The draft is deeper at WR and OLB, so I'll take the LT and DT early and the other positions next: 1 9 Buffalo Bryan Bulaga OT Iowa 2 ---------Trade For McNabb----------------------------------------------------------- 3 72 Buffalo Cam Thomas DT34 North Carolina 4 107 Buffalo Mike Neal DE34 Purdue 5 140 Buffalo Lindsey Witten OLB34 Connecticut 6 178 Buffalo Blair White WRF Michigan State 6 192 Buffalo Clifton Geathers DE34 South Carolina 7 209 Buffalo Kion Wilson ILB South Florida 7 216 Buffalo Tony Washington OT Abilene Christian
cåblelady Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 I think Trent is your likely starter next year. That is just based on some things I have heard and my knowledge of the situation. However as many have pointed out, it is way too early for any type of certainty. You just made me throw up in my mouth a little.
nucci Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 All... Don't have much, but I hate to leave everyone hanging. It will not be Clausen at 9. Bradford is the only QB that they would take there and he will obviously be gone. I guess they could always take him later in the draft. There is interest in McNabb, but the new regime places such a high value on draft picks, it is not likely to happen. OT is still the leader in the club house for the pick. I don't like to make predictions, I would rather give information. However since I have been asked, I think Trent is your likely starter next year. That is just based on some things I have heard and my knowledge of the situation. However as many have pointed out, it is way too early for any type of certainty. Thanks for the info. Question about Edwards. Didn't he lose the team last year? I know there is a new staff but seemed like they all lost confidence in him.
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 I'm looking at this from an available players point of view, and taking McNabb with a 2nd this year would mean having to really stick to our needs for the other picks--LT, NT, DE, WR, OLB, ILB, RT.The draft is deeper at WR and OLB, so I'll take the LT and DT early and the other positions next: 1 9 Buffalo Bryan Bulaga OT Iowa 2 ---------Trade For McNabb----------------------------------------------------------- 3 72 Buffalo Cam Thomas DT34 North Carolina 4 107 Buffalo Mike Neal DE34 Purdue 5 140 Buffalo Lindsey Witten OLB34 Connecticut 6 178 Buffalo Blair White WRF Michigan State 6 192 Buffalo Clifton Geathers DE34 South Carolina 7 209 Buffalo Kion Wilson ILB South Florida 7 216 Buffalo Tony Washington OT Abilene Christian Isn't Neal a 3-technique, 4-3 end? Blair White is a great athlete with character, love to have him on the team Witten will never do. He's Donte's lil bro... I jokes, but he is the real lil Donte great mock though, really
Celtic_soulja Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 TE will win back the team...and win us 987108934018937401328750134875098134709587034879032875 SB's...all in only four years....that's my prediction
Nevergiveup Posted March 26, 2010 Author Posted March 26, 2010 Thanks for the info. Question about Edwards. Didn't he lose the team last year? I know there is a new staff but seemed like they all lost confidence in him. Definitely still well liked and respected by the players. That won't be a problem. No one could have performed well under those circumstances last year. I know it will be painful for people, but it will be interesting to see if Gailey can do anything with him. There will have to be another QB on the roster. I just don't have enough info to tell you if it will be a vet or a draft pick.
NewEra Posted March 27, 2010 Posted March 27, 2010 Isn't Neal a 3-technique, 4-3 end?Blair White is a great athlete with character, love to have him on the team Witten will never do. He's Donte's lil bro... I jokes, but he is the real lil Donte great mock though, really it is a great mock. But the only way we get Cam Thomas is if we draft him in round 2.
Doc Posted March 27, 2010 Posted March 27, 2010 If there is anything other than an open competition at QB, I won't be happy.
nucci Posted March 27, 2010 Posted March 27, 2010 Definitely still well liked and respected by the players. That won't be a problem. No one could have performed well under those circumstances last year. I know it will be painful for people, but it will be interesting to see if Gailey can do anything with him. There will have to be another QB on the roster. I just don't have enough info to tell you if it will be a vet or a draft pick. Thanks.
thewildrabbit Posted March 27, 2010 Posted March 27, 2010 Chan Gailey has been noted in the past to build a strong power running game, I'm hoping he continues that in Buffalo. If that Raven- Patriot wildcard playoff game didn't open some eyes in the Bills front office then nothing ever will.
Red Posted March 27, 2010 Posted March 27, 2010 I don't think any QB this year is worth #1 billing. We should draft LT with #9 overall, and then quickly go NT at #41.
Billy in 4C Posted March 27, 2010 Posted March 27, 2010 Nevergiveup, You mentioned leaning toward OT in round 1. Does that mean they are more or less looking to fill positons which there are holes or are they going to take the best player on their board regardless of positon? If its by position do you know what other positions they might be targeting in their first few picks?
Recommended Posts