KD in CA Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 He was being a complete a-hole and trying to hijack the tea party. He was being disruptive and deserved what he got. "hijack the tea party"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 I'd bet for every right wing extremist there's 100 left wing extremists. That's just a fact. Which is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 I 100% agree. Every time some teabag wingnut does this kind of thing independents flock to the democratic party. To the open arms of Code Pink, no doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celtic_soulja Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 There may be more leftist extremists but they are much better with shutting thier pie hole until the right time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrojanitor Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 Great find. Just another reminder than Obama's base are just a bunch of savages. as opposed to the saints who taunted and harassed the peaceful protest of Dr.Lechter? or have been throwing bricks through the windows of congressional offices? you're a hypocrite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 I'd bet for every right wing extremist there's 100 left wing extremists. That's just a fact. Link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrojanitor Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 I'd bet for every right wing extremist there's 100 left wing extremists. That's just a fact. it's just a fact you'd bet for every right wing extremist there's 100 left wing extremists? you make less sense with every post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WisconsinBillzFan Posted March 26, 2010 Author Share Posted March 26, 2010 as opposed to the saints who taunted and harassed the peaceful protest of Dr.Lechter? or have been throwing bricks through the windows of congressional offices? you're a hypocrite 1) They taunted and harassed a man who gave them no choice not to by goading them into it and hijacking their tea party 2) The brick throwings have already been debunked as false flag attacks. http://www.redstate.com/martin_a_knight/20...are-convenient/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celtic_soulja Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 as opposed to the saints who taunted and harassed the peaceful protest of Dr.Lechter? or have been throwing bricks through the windows of congressional offices? you're a hypocrite EXACTLY...I'm a conservative but I shake my head at how these idiots are making me look bad...I mean, really...and not that they are any better in government...I felt so abandoned by the republican party with Bush...it was ridiculous...there is no compassion or tolerance...so far from where we need to be... Liberals are uniformed and conservatives are just too intolerant and ignorant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrojanitor Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 1) They taunted and harassed a man who gave them no choice not to by goading them into it and hijacking their tea part 2) The brick throwings have already been debunked as false flag attacks. http://www.redstate.com/martin_a_knight/20...are-convenient/ well if the conservative blog says so it must be true...... you're delusional and a hypocrite. you support violence against those who disagree with you. That is sickening and does more to hurt your cause than anything a liberal could ever do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 1) They taunted and harassed a man who gave them no choice not to by goading them into it and hijacking their tea party 2) The brick throwings have already been debunked as false flag attacks. http://www.redstate.com/martin_a_knight/20...are-convenient/ Hijacking their event by sitting down quietly with a sign? Yeah, he really goaded them into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WisconsinBillzFan Posted March 26, 2010 Author Share Posted March 26, 2010 well if the conservative blog says so it must be true...... you're delusional and a hypocrite. you support violence against those who disagree with you. That is sickening and does more to hurt your cause than anything a liberal could ever do. So did our Founding Fathers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celtic_soulja Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 Hijacking their event by sitting down quietly with a sign? Yeah, he really goaded them into it. yeah he was totally hijacking them...did you see him will thier money out of thier pockets...possessed that jerk so he would throw his money at him???...it's those magical mind bullets of the liberals...you know and the teabaggers know it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrojanitor Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 I just noticed the sub heading is "liberal payback for exercising first amendment rights" so harassing a man for exercising his first amendment rights is okay only as long as conservatives are the harassers? good stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrojanitor Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 So did our Founding Fathers. So does Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Also comparing a revolution against foreign occupation to losing an election to a democrat is !@#$ing idiotic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WisconsinBillzFan Posted March 26, 2010 Author Share Posted March 26, 2010 I just noticed the sub heading is "liberal payback for exercising first amendment rights" so harassing a man for exercising his first amendment rights is okay only as long as conservatives are the harassers? good stuff. Hijacking a tea party is not covered under the first amendment. The man was acting boorishly and needed to be made an example of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 So did our Founding Fathers. Give us a break. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celtic_soulja Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 this is going to get really ugly...reallllly ugly...the animosity of the right is at a fever pitch...the government is ignoring the people...it's getting ridiculous... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrojanitor Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 Hijacking a tea party is not covered under the first amendment. The man was acting boorishly and needed to be made an example of. peaceful protest is boorish? Whole thing is caught on tape--you can't spin this into more of your victim fetishization. teabaggers behaved horribly and they actually took responsibility for their actions and apologized. stop being such a fool. time to grow up chuckles, throwing one of your many temper tantrums is not political discourse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celtic_soulja Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 "So you got an opinion, does that make you a politician?" hehehehe...yeah no, these tea baggers are getting way out of line...I'll continue to vote for Ron Paul...but in secret Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts