finknottle Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Not elementary school related, but 'This American Life' http://www.thisamericanlife.org/ (see NUMMI episode) has an interesting podcast on the failure of GM management to capitalize on Japanese workplace techniques. While TAL is reflexively liberal, the unions come off surprisingly poorly - lots of candid interviews with union members detail the corrupt UAW workplace culture and how they ran the show.
pBills Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Not elementary school related, but 'This American Life'http://www.thisamericanlife.org/ (see NUMMI episode) has an interesting podcast on the failure of GM management to capitalize on Japanese workplace techniques. While TAL is reflexively liberal, the unions come off surprisingly poorly - lots of candid interviews with union members detail the corrupt UAW workplace culture and how they ran the show. I wouldn't doubt it. I have seen some lazy, corrupt union people in my life. However, I have also seen a lot of great union people too. I'm just not one to lump everyone in with the bad like many people here do.
VABills Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Of course it's only a small portion of the budget per school. As I have been saying all along that their school will only receive roughly $56k for supplies, overhead, maintenance, blah, blah, blah. $56k is not a lot of cashola. Actually read and understand. The number is 3 to 4 times that. Only the 56K portion is the per child allotment. there are base numbers each school gets for supplies, over, etc... regardless of student count.
DC Tom Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 I wouldn't doubt it. I have seen some lazy, corrupt union people in my life. Shocking. I mean, they're such a !@#$ing rarity.
DC Tom Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 I was looking numbers as they broke down per school jackass. WHAT numbers? You're looking at nothing more than a per-school "equity" calculation based on enrollment. You're obviously not looking at the operational budget, since that's a completely different calculation in a completely separate section of the document - which you'd know if you didn't cherry-pick your numbers. Learn to read a !@#$ing budget, dumbass. I don't know what you're trying to prove with your assertion that Frederick MD schools only get a $50k/year budget...I DO know that you're proving that you're clueless.
pBills Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Shocking. I mean, they're such a !@#$ing rarity. Not the majority I have met. Just because you didn't have a great experience doesn't mean it's that way across the board.
pBills Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 WHAT numbers? You're looking at nothing more than a per-school "equity" calculation based on enrollment. You're obviously not looking at the operational budget, since that's a completely different calculation in a completely separate section of the document - which you'd know if you didn't cherry-pick your numbers. Learn to read a !@#$ing budget, dumbass. I don't know what you're trying to prove with your assertion that Frederick MD schools only get a $50k/year budget...I DO know that you're proving that you're clueless. Part of each individual schools operational budget is only around $50k-$70k depending on school. Again, I said PART of their operational budget.
VABills Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Part of each individual schools operational budget is only around $50k-$70k depending on school. Again, I said PART of their operational budget. Part of each schools salary budget is 50-70K also.
Joe Miner Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Part of each individual schools operational budget is only around $50k-$70k depending on school. Again, I said PART of their operational budget. Damn...it's worse than trying to tell my wife she's wrong. Learn to STFU man. Seriously. You're the only one that thinks you know what you're talking about. Just walk away.
3rdnlng Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Part of each individual schools operational budget is only around $50k-$70k depending on school. Again, I said PART of their operational budget. You originally claimed that 56k was their total budget and then wavered on whether or not that included salaries of teachers, etc. You then claimed you were at a meeting that included teachers, parents and board members. When another poster called you out you then claimed that there were no board members present. When caught in your lies, you just simply try to lie your way out of them and then resort to calling people names. Pathetic.
DC Tom Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Part of each individual schools operational budget is only around $50k-$70k depending on school. Again, I said PART of their operational budget. Part of their budget is only $6, too.
pBills Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 You originally claimed that 56k was their total budget and then wavered on whether or not that included salaries of teachers, etc. You then claimed you were at a meeting that included teachers, parents and board members. When another poster called you out you then claimed that there were no board members present. When caught in your lies, you just simply try to lie your way out of them and then resort to calling people names. Pathetic. No I did not. I have ALWAYS stated that it covered parts of their operations minus salaries, etc. Quit trying to start crap.
DC Tom Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 No I did not. I have ALWAYS stated that it covered parts of their operations minus salaries, etc. Quit trying to start crap. This is true. You were very up-front and clear that you weren't taking salaries into account.
pBills Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Part of their budget is only $6, too. Go back and read. I have stated what that part if their budget covered. Many times.
DC Tom Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Go back and read. I have stated what that part if their budget covered. Many times. Yes, you did: "everything".
3rdnlng Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Yes, you did: "everything". But, can't you read between the lines and know that I meant everything but salaries? Or not.
Joe Miner Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Yes, you did: "everything". That quote has been pointed out to him multiple times in this thread. But apparently "everything" in retard world should be substituted with "part of something I don't understand". Make that substitution and his posts clear up significantly.
pBills Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Yes, you did: "everything". Which was followed up by "Frederick, MD - $56,000 to run the school. Not including salaries of course."
pBills Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 That quote has been pointed out to him multiple times in this thread. But apparently "everything" in retard world should be substituted with "part of something I don't understand". Make that substitution and his posts clear up significantly. Here we go. Another "genius" HAHAHAHAHA!!!
Joe Miner Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Which was followed up by "Frederick, MD - $56,000 to run the school. Not including salaries of course." Seriously if you think your train of "thought" in this thread has been straightforward, clear, and consistent, you've got much deeper problems than grammar and typing. Does it really have to get to the point that your trail of idiocy in this thread has to be spelled out for you?
Recommended Posts