Dante Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 oh that's adorable, I bet you even really believe that. so i assume you, and all conservatives, support gay marriage? It would increase the rights of a group of people and would hurt exactly no one. I assume you, and all conservatives, support women's reproductive rights? A woman should be the sole decider over her body without people's religious beliefs forcing her hand, don't you think? I assume you, and all conservatives, support the repeal of don't ask don't tell? No reason while one group of people should be denied military service, don't you think? I mean thinking the military is going to become one giant roman orgy is akin to thinking you have to rape everyone you see. I assume you, and all conservative, oppose the teaching of creationism in schools. teaching religious stories as scientific fact only hurts our kids ability to compete in the globalized work place. Oh here's a fun story. Remember when Ashcroft felt the need to cover the breasts of the of statute of justice because it offended him so? Man that liberal Ashcroft was a dink. You are not part of some noble collective that is maligned by the big bad media. You are just as !@#$ed up as the other side I always shake my head when I read utter bs like this. I'm not religious in the least. In fact, I would classify myself as an atheist. How utterly selfish of you and your ilk to spew something like this. Fine for you to throw away life when its not yours. Just like its easy to throw money around to others when its not yours. What if your mother just decided to abort you because your birth was not convenient for her at that time? Ever think of that? Probably not. When a women gets pregnant its not just her body anymore. Little baby has a right to live. The most basic right of all.
Magox Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 I read that Krauthammer article this morning on the VAT. Great article. Dig his insight. But if they try to put a VAT on top of income taxes, I shudder to think how this country would react. If this bill doesn't get "repealed and replaced" then it will happen.
IDBillzFan Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 When a women gets pregnant its not just her body anymore. The baby has a right to live. The most basic right of all and there is nothing you could say to make me see it any different. Learn liberal speak: it's not a baby...it's a fetus.
Dante Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Learn liberal speak: it's not a baby...it's a fetus. I know there is a dispute when a fetus becomes a human. To me it couldn't be more black and white. From day one its a kid. Anyway, didn't mean to hi jack
Alaska Darin Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 I always shake my head when I read utter bs like this. I'm not religious in the least. In fact, I would classify myself as an atheist. How utterly selfish of you and your ilk to spew something like this. Fine for you to throw away life when its not yours. Just like its easy to throw money around to others when its not yours. What if your mother just decided to abort you because your birth was not convenient for her at that time? Ever think of that? Probably not. When a women gets pregnant its not just her body anymore. Little baby has a right to live. The most basic right of all. How many kids have you adopted?
Joe Miner Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 How many kids have you adopted? The only argument about abortion is whether it's a person or not. If it's a human, then abortion is murder. Doesn't matter whether someone else is willing to adopt. If it's not a human, then it's a medical procedure similar to removing a cyst. Again, it doesn't matter whether anyone is willing to adopt. The adoption argument is just an Ad Hominem attack. It really has no bearing on whether abortion is right or wrong. If you want to have a discussion on adoption, that's a whole different can of worms.
Astrojanitor Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 I always shake my head when I read utter bs like this. I'm not religious in the least. In fact, I would classify myself as an atheist. How utterly selfish of you and your ilk to spew something like this. Fine for you to throw away life when its not yours. Just like its easy to throw money around to others when its not yours. What if your mother just decided to abort you because your birth was not convenient for her at that time? Ever think of that? Probably not. When a women gets pregnant its not just her body anymore. Little baby has a right to live. The most basic right of all. I'm sure the quarter inch bundle of cells with no cognitive reasoning would have been able to handle the disappointment.
Alaska Darin Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 The only argument about abortion is whether it's a person or not. If it's a human, then abortion is murder. Doesn't matter whether someone else is willing to adopt. If it's not a human, then it's a medical procedure similar to removing a cyst. Again, it doesn't matter whether anyone is willing to adopt. The adoption argument is just an Ad Hominem attack. It really has no bearing on whether abortion is right or wrong. If you want to have a discussion on adoption, that's a whole different can of worms. I'm looking at it from the pragmatist angle. There are somewhere in the neighborhood of 500k kids going to bed under government roofs every night. The abortion numbers, depending on who you believe, are between 500k and 4,000,000 annually. Let's assume that its the lower number. Let's then assume that abortion becomes illegal. Let's also assume that means half as many women get pregnant "accidentally". Half of those end up being born (because making abortion illegal isn't going to stop it anymore than the Drug War has kept LSD off playgrounds). Half of those end up in the system. That means in 4 years the number of unwanted children in America that the government is providing for is now a million. We have a hard enough time providing for the kids that are already here. Let's get that knocked out before we grow the problem exponentially, shall we?
Da Big Man Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 I'm looking at it from the pragmatist angle. There are somewhere in the neighborhood of 500k kids going to bed under government roofs every night. The abortion numbers, depending on who you believe, are between 500k and 4,000,000 annually. Let's assume that its the lower number. Let's then assume that abortion becomes illegal. Let's also assume that means half as many women get pregnant "accidentally". Half of those end up being born (because making abortion illegal isn't going to stop it anymore than the Drug War has kept LSD off playgrounds). Half of those end up in the system. That means in 4 years the number of unwanted children in America that the government is providing for is now a million. We have a hard enough time providing for the kids that are already here. Let's get that knocked out before we grow the problem exponentially, shall we? Wow..look at that we are in total agreement!
Astrojanitor Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Learn liberal speak: it's not a baby...it's a fetus. learn proper english: Fetus –noun,plural-tus·es. Embryology. (used chiefly of viviparous mammals) the young of an animal in the womb or egg, esp. in the later stages of development when the body structures are in the recognizable form of its kind, in humans after the end of the second month of gestation. In reality aborting a fetus is illegal. Fetus is third trimester, zygote before then. It is legal to abort a zygote. it's called science, not semantics. This is not a liberal conspiracy to promote murder, if you can prove a bundle of cells the size of a fingernail is able to sustain life outside of the womb then you have a baby. And an argument.
Alaska Darin Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Wow..look at that we are in total agreement! That was certainly something I was striving for. Now if you'd stop PMing me like some lost retarded puppy dog.
Da Big Man Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 He wants Congress to legislate radio content?? Nice. They really want it like the old Soviet Union I guess. What amazes me is that Obama* showed his true colors pre-election and so many people were resistant to the idea he was a socialist and now , as I predicted pre-election, the middle class is under attack. He can't actually take your money to redistribute the wealth but he can make you broke. thats why Healthcare was first instead of jobs and economy. Next is going to be making all the illegals, legal with one swing of his magic wand and in a few months when our unsustainable economy crumbles he will have what he wants, desperation. And desperation leads to conformity. This adminstration is trying to make as many people dependent on the state. CONTROL is what this is all about..not governing. CONTROL over your money, CONTROL over your healthcare, CONTROL over you! Obama* has had CONTROL over the media since pre-election and his pet peacock is still providing shelter to this failed experiment called The Obama* Presidency. Was this the hope you had, was this the change you were after. I mean after all , the wars are still going on, as a matter of fact, Troop surges in Trashcanistan. Spending through the roof... Bush had 1 trillion dollars in deficeit in 8 years..Obama* has it in his first , very vanilla, year as President and it is expect to be 10 trillion in ten years. WAKE UP! Don't tread on me. Don't be ashamed to be Americans, Don't let these people tell you how to live, Don't give up and please Don't give in. The 2010 mid term elections will prove what the American people really want and soon the Republicans will have the power back. God Bless America.
Da Big Man Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 That was certainly something I was striving for. Now if you'd stop PMing me like some lost retarded puppy dog. You call yourself a Libertarian, yet you call names like a lib P.O.S. huh
Alaska Darin Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 You call yourself a Libertarian, yet you call names like a lib P.O.S. huh Personal MessageFrom: Da Big Man Hey **** for brains! Stop harrassing me. I am against Obama* and all he stands for thats all I am saying. So please as I asked awhile ago stop PM ing me or I will report you. Thanx. Look. Another hypocritical "do as I say, not as I do" conservative. Run along, little fella. The last thing you want is my undivided attention.
Da Big Man Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Look. Another hypocritical "do as I say, not as I do" conservative. Run along, little fella. The last thing you want is my undivided attention. If you are going to post PM's then post them all, call you Mr. Spin. Only let the people see what you want them to see.. Look familiar anyone?
RkFast Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 I'm looking at it from the pragmatist angle. There are somewhere in the neighborhood of 500k kids going to bed under government roofs every night. The abortion numbers, depending on who you believe, are between 500k and 4,000,000 annually. Let's assume that its the lower number. Let's then assume that abortion becomes illegal. Let's also assume that means half as many women get pregnant "accidentally". Half of those end up being born (because making abortion illegal isn't going to stop it anymore than the Drug War has kept LSD off playgrounds). Half of those end up in the system. That means in 4 years the number of unwanted children in America that the government is providing for is now a million. We have a hard enough time providing for the kids that are already here. Let's get that knocked out before we grow the problem exponentially, shall we? Its kind of simplistic to think that if abortion was illegal, all those babies that would "have to" be born would be "unwanted." Im guessing that at LEAST 9/10 of those so called "unwanted" kids would move into the "wanted" column once the mom looks into that kid's eyes for the first time. Parenthood and protection of one's newborn and child is a pretty powerful !@#$ing thing. One of the basic instincts of nature.
GG Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Its kind of simplistic to think that if abortion was illegal, all those babies that would "have to" be born would be "unwanted." Im guessing that at LEAST 9/10 of those so called "unwanted" kids would move into the "wanted" column once the mom looks into that kid's eyes for the first time. Parenthood and protection of one's newborn and child is a pretty powerful !@#$ing thing. One of the basic instincts of nature. Yup, that's exactly how parents react to kids when it's a whoppsie. The moms & dads love those baby girls in China & India, for example.
RkFast Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Yup, that's exactly how parents react to kids when it's a whoppsie. The moms & dads love those baby girls in China & India, for example. Thats a completely !@#$ing ridiculous example to disprove what Im saying and you know it. And I DID was I was "GUESSING" at what the ACTUAL "ratio" would be. So stop.
Dante Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 How many kids have you adopted? I'm somewhat responsible so I look after what I have and i also realize its all I can handle . If my wife got pregnant I would hope abortion would not cross her mind. What else do you want? So I'm against abortion I'm obligated to adopt?
Alaska Darin Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 If you are going to post PM's then post them all, call you Mr. Spin. Only let the people see what you want them to see.. Look familiar anyone? Ok. Since you asked, I'll post all the ones I have. If you have any, feel free to add them. We can let the community decide whatever it is you're looking for. Duh Big Man: Nice! Very constructive. Dems do more to ruin this country than Reps. Calling names and use of labels is a true Liberal call card...nice job. I regurgitate nothing, it is how I feel in my heart. This Country is on the cusp of disaster. Dems have held office for the last three of five terms and now Obama* is going for our throats. Do you care about the Constitution? All I am saying is Dems are for big controlling Gov. and Reps are for smaller hands off Gov. the prefer the latter. AD: Stop wasting my time. People like you make me sick. Duh Big Man: I know the truth hurts. I wouldn't be wasting your time if you would stop throwing around your big brain and start answering questions and giving ideas. Look back at my old post and see that I am spot on. This run-away freighttrain is going to worse far before it gets better. AD: I know it's going to get worse, meathead. The problem is your solution is NO DIFFERENT than the one you're currently railing about. So feel free to !@#$ off because people like you are the problem, not part of the solution. I don't owe partisan lemmings explanations. You regurgitate the typical conservative speak but ignore the big government liberalism that has infected the Republican party just as much as the Dummycrats you B word about. Your hypocrisy is almost worse than the liberals. Duh Big Man: Can't stand the heat, then get your ass out of the kitchen. Don't email again with this BS. The truth will never go away. Approval rating at 45% and plummeting. AD: It's nice to know that your reading comprehension hasn't improved any during your vacation. Yep, you're still an idiot. Duh Big Man: Thanks for starting 2010 with more non-sensical bull ****. Go read your copy of the communist hand book. AD Any mirrors in your world, retard? Duh Big Man: Celebrating your socialist healthcare victory? ...got your hope and change today? AD Nice to know you're still a complete idiot. Duh Big Man: Hey **** for brains! Stop harrassing me. I am against Obama* and all he stands for thats all I am saying. So please as I asked awhile ago stop PM ing me or I will report you. Thanx.**** AD Uh, you PM'd me. I responded. That's going to happen every single time you PM me. I don't care about your politics. Feel free to report me. That would be awesome. I'll have you banned so fast it'll make your head spin. Duh Big Man: Freedom of speech much. Just stop harrassing me O.K. Truce. No need to PM me back. AD 1st: You're in NO position to make demands. 2nd: Freedom of Speech means that you're free to speak out against the government. It doesn't mean anything else. 3rd: I've never "harrassed" you. YOU started PMing ME. You don't get to make the rules and you certainly don't get to pretend that you're some kind of !@#$ing victim because I've proved what a hypocritical idiot you are. Now lets see if you can keep the "truce" you're so desperately seeking by NOT RESPONDING TO THIS PM. You friggin' douche bag. **** This is my favorite PM. Dude is gone for 2 months. The first day his reinstatement, he PMs me to stop harassing him. Even funnier is the fact that he never once complained about it prior, just kept coming back after each suspension to get a little more. All of you liberal idiots who like to rail on this board for our "right wingness" now get to see a tiny bit of what goes on behind the scenes. Enjoy.
Recommended Posts