Beastly Dareus Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8...mp;confirm=true Gotta love when people with money has evidence against them, then it mysteriously vanishes or something like this happens. "An attorney for the Georgia nightclub where a 20-year-old woman accused Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger of sexually assaulting her said security footage from the evening of the alleged incident was recorded over, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reported Thursday." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 Oopsie daisies! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phlegm Alley Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 No, this is a shocker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beastly Dareus Posted March 25, 2010 Author Share Posted March 25, 2010 No, this is a shocker. Ya ill give you that one too, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kota Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 I read that the tape would help Ben's case not hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beastly Dareus Posted March 25, 2010 Author Share Posted March 25, 2010 I read that the tape would help Ben's case not hurt. Well according to that article the tape showed Big Ben with the girl at about the time the girl said it happened. And ESPN just said basically the same thing on Sportscenter. So I dont know how in th world that would help Ben "Cansino said a member of Roethlisberger's entourage recorded his own video inside the nightclub, where the quarterback and eight to 10 friends went to celebrate his 28th birthday. According to Cansino, the footage shows Roethlisberger with his accuser around the time of the incident." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayFinkle Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 What a joke...oh well. Phase 1: Complete. Phase 2: Discredit Big Ben's accuser. I'm sure "reports" will soon be coming out about what a nut case, drunken whore Big Ben's accuser actually is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 Looks like Rose Mary Woods is at it again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonInBuffalo Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 Gee, why might a bar owner want to destroy a tape that shows a bunch of underage people in his bar, as opposed to giving that tape to the police? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 Gee, why might a bar owner want to destroy a tape that shows a bunch of underage people in his bar, as opposed to giving that tape to the police? They would prolly overlook that for the bigger charge of catching a high profile athlete and making an example of him... JMO tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beastly Dareus Posted March 26, 2010 Author Share Posted March 26, 2010 Gee, why might a bar owner want to destroy a tape that shows a bunch of underage people in his bar, as opposed to giving that tape to the police? Actually... the video tape was in police hands. They where "watching the tape at the station then they got a call and they responded, they came back and the tape was recorded over" according to ESPN's report of what the police department told them. So goes your theory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinii Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 Actually... the video tape was in police hands. They where "watching the tape at the station then they got a call and they responded, they came back and the tape was recorded over" according to ESPN's report of what the police department told them. So goes your theory who is surprised? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LancasterSteve Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 Actually... the video tape was in police hands. They where "watching the tape at the station then they got a call and they responded, they came back and the tape was recorded over" according to ESPN's report of what the police department told them. Someone got paid big bucks unless this hicksville PD is on the order of Mayberry with a Barnny Fife running the show. My money says its the former. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 Considering that the same cop who wrote up the incident report was posing for pictures with Big Ben earlier that evening ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stussy109 Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 some people got PAID Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiderweb Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8...mp;confirm=true Gotta love when people with money has evidence against them, then it mysteriously vanishes or something like this happens. "An attorney for the Georgia nightclub where a 20-year-old woman accused Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger of sexually assaulting her said security footage from the evening of the alleged incident was recorded over, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reported Thursday." This brings to mind an age old question, what was Nixon thinking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 This brings to mind an age old question, what was Nixon thinking? The stupid broad would actually have the blue dress laundered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGB Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 The stupid broad would actually have the blue dress laundered. Maybe it depends on what the meaning of the word is is: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 It is not impossible to recover data from a video tape that has been recorded over. It can be expensive, but it is doable. A quick internet search came up with quite a few data retrieval companies, guess they don't have Google in Midgeville... What is strange is that the article said it was a DVD to start with and then later it calls it a tape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 No, this is a shocker. ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts