BeastMode54 Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 I've been reading all these McNabb to the Rams rumors, and one of the biggest reasons they want him is that due to the ownership situation in St. Louis, they won't be able to pay for the #1 pick. Stafford's deal was over $40 mil. IF McNabb goes and signs an extension, which he would want, his contract would be less, and possibly much less, than Bradfords deal at #1. McNabb, a perenial pro Bowler and top talent in the NFL, busts his ass for years in the NFL and some snot nosed rookie can just come in with no NFL experience and get one of the highest contracts of all time. I just don't get it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgrid Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 if they really cant afford the #1 pick, what will they do, pass? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meark Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 if they really cant afford the #1 pick, what will they do, pass? They would trade it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Rob Johnson Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 can't afford QB at #1, positional player would cost less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgrid Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 They would trade it.. assuming someone else wants it. seems like top few picks are not so coveted now. once again, rookie cap issue. can't afford QB at #1, positional player would cost less. like a boy named Suh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts