KOKBILLS Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 KzooMike said: If this team wasn't playing so lights out we would be in serious trouble with the INT's...Why the hell can't JP be doing these things right now? 3 rookie type picks, at least if it was being done by a rookie I could justify it a bit. 136140[/snapback] Correct! The assumtion, I believe, is that JP would have trouble moving the chains with the good Passes...But certainly it has to be doubtful that JP could throw as many bad Passes...
Guest Guest_eyedog_* Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 oooppps I guess that was outside of the 38yd fg range.
CosmicBills Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 hehehehe..."leaping" what a BS call. But I'll take it.
Guest Guest Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 tgreg99 said: hehehehe..."leaping" what a BS call. But I'll take it. 136151[/snapback] I'm glad we got it, but what a stupid rule! This could break the game open for us!
CosmicBills Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 Alright Willis! Way to capitalize O! Great blocking by the O-Line all day today.
VabeachBledsoefan Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 I do like how Drew is spreading the ball around....not just to Moulds...hey up by 3 touchdowns..i can give hinm a break for INT's
Frez Posted November 28, 2004 Author Posted November 28, 2004 What goal line vision..... give WILLIS SOME LOVE BABY!
KOKBILLS Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 tgreg99 said: hehehehe..."leaping" what a BS call. But I'll take it. 136151[/snapback] That was a HUGE break... You could see it on the Hawks Players faces...That one hurt BAD! B)
Mikie2times Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 tgreg99 said: hehehehe..."leaping" what a BS call. But I'll take it. 136151[/snapback] It was the right call, it is BS rule though. like you said, I'll take it
cåblelady Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 ndmanley said: Lindell still sucks. 136160[/snapback] He does not.
ndmanley Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 cåblelady said: He does not. 136164[/snapback] He does too
BillsSouth Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 Lindell is NOT a 50-yard kicker. Period.
Rayzer32 Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 BillsSouth said: Lindell is NOT a 50-yard kicker. Period. 136172[/snapback] He is a big risk over 35 yds.
jayg Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 Our corners have been very lucky in this game.
cåblelady Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 Rayzer32 said: He is a big risk over 35 yds. 136177[/snapback] Oh.....y'all suck.
gtiracer06 Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 BillsSouth said: Lindell is NOT a 50-yard kicker. Period. 136172[/snapback] Lindell is NOT a kicker. Period.
Ball'n Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 he cant hit 50% over 40 but under 40 he is solid.
(2).thumb.jpeg.6e78fe3142ec9e6bfedbf027610db26f.jpeg)
Recommended Posts