Doc Posted March 27, 2010 Posted March 27, 2010 BTW, looks like more than a few coaches weren't happy with the way their owners voted. Hmmm.
JohnC Posted March 27, 2010 Posted March 27, 2010 BTW, looks like more than a few coaches weren't happy with the way their owners voted. Hmmm. Who cares about the OT rules? They certainly do not apply to the Bills who are historically non-participants in the playoffs.
Beerball Posted March 27, 2010 Posted March 27, 2010 I know it's a small thing, but I saw that the Bills were one of four teams to vote against the new overtime rule.How do you vote against a reasonable solution to an overtime rule everyone knew was unfair? Seriously, do the Bills ever vote FOR anything new? Ralph continues to reinforce his old codger status. Whhat's the excuse this time? Not enough time to study it again? Lost our bifocals, did we? This rule change is idiotic. Sudden death is sudden death. A safety can win a game but a FG can not. Different rules for regular season and playoffs. What won a game in week 17 won't count the next. If you want to change overtime then change it. Have an 8 or 10 or 12 or 15 or whatever number can be agreed to extra period. At the end whoever has more points wins! Yes, in other words PLAY FOOTBALL. The changes as they currently stand are rediculous.
Doc Posted March 27, 2010 Posted March 27, 2010 Who cares about the OT rules? They certainly do not apply to the Bills who are historically non-participants in the playoffs.
Malazan Posted March 27, 2010 Posted March 27, 2010 I know it's a small thing, but I saw that the Bills were one of four teams to vote against the new overtime rule.How do you vote against a reasonable solution to an overtime rule everyone knew was unfair? Seriously, do the Bills ever vote FOR anything new? Ralph continues to reinforce his old codger status. Whhat's the excuse this time? Not enough time to study it again? Lost our bifocals, did we? Hooray for not reading anything on the subject! Congratulations!
Recommended Posts