erynthered Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Good find http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405...eTabs%3Darticle Another good one. The comment section is a must read too. A little snip: In a $5.4 billion revenue grab, Democrats decided that this $665 fillip should be subject to the ordinary corporate income tax of 35%. Most consulting firms and independent analysts say the higher costs will induce some companies to drop drug coverage, which could affect about five million retirees and 3,500 businesses. Verizon and other large corporations warned about this outcome. I forsee a bloody November.
Fan in San Diego Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 It's not that I disagree with you. It's that you're an idiot. Your different viewpoint is based on you being facile and ignorant. I don't give a damn whether someone disagrees with me or not. I DO give a damn that their opinions aren't bull ****, regardless of whether I agree or disagree. If you and I were in complete agreement, I'd still denigrate you...because you're a moron. Wow, for all to see here on the board when DC Tom is out of ammo and/or doesn't like your viewpoint he starts to hurl insults. Way to go Tom, acting just like a typical greedy, selfish, pompous, name calling, venom spitting, irrational, pot stirring and filibustering rather than finding solutions republican.
Alaska Darin Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Wow, for all to see here on the board when DC Tom is out of ammo and/or doesn't like your viewpoint he starts to hurl insults. Way to go Tom, acting just like a typical greedy, selfish, pompous, name calling, venom spitting, irrational, pot stirring and filibustering rather than finding solutions republican. Read this post back to yourself and try to figure out what a !@#$ing hypocrite you are.
DC Tom Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Wow, for all to see here on the board when DC Tom is out of ammo and/or doesn't like your viewpoint he starts to hurl insults. Way to go Tom, acting just like a typical greedy, selfish, pompous, name calling, venom spitting, irrational, pot stirring and filibustering rather than finding solutions republican. Again...it's not that I dislike your viewpoint. It's that you're an idiot. If you changed your viewpoint, you'd get just as much ****, because you'd still be an idiot. That's not be "running out of ammo"; that's me responding directly to the post that you made: you whined about being denigrated for your point of view. I responded precisely to that: it's not your point of view, it's your demonstrated incapacity to have a single rational thought rattle through your addled brain, as evidenced, for example, to somehow view bankruptcy as qualitatively different depending on the cause (death or health costs). It's not that I disagree...it's that you can't even possibly understand why someone else would disagree. That's not a point of view, that's just mental retardation. Don't like it? Don't be a retard.
Alaska Darin Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Again...it's not that I dislike your viewpoint. It's that you're an idiot. If you changed your viewpoint, you'd get just as much ****, because you'd still be an idiot. That's not be "running out of ammo"; that's me responding directly to the post that you made: you whined about being denigrated for your point of view. I responded precisely to that: it's not your point of view, it's your demonstrated incapacity to have a single rational thought rattle through your addled brain, as evidenced, for example, to somehow view bankruptcy as qualitatively different depending on the cause (death or health costs). It's not that I disagree...it's that you can't even possibly understand why someone else would disagree. That's not a point of view, that's just mental retardation. Don't like it? Don't be a retard. Shut up, Republican.
DC Tom Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Read this post back to yourself and try to figure out what a !@#$ing hypocrite you are. Hell, he should read the post I RESPONDED TO, and try to figure that out. Won't happen. Heartfelt outrage is better than fact, since victimization is noble.
Chef Jim Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Wow, for all to see here on the board when DC Tom is out of ammo and/or doesn't like your viewpoint he starts to hurl insults. Way to go Tom, acting just like a typical greedy, selfish, pompous, name calling, venom spitting, irrational, pot stirring and filibustering rather than finding solutions republican. Please Tom for the love of God what are you? Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Commie, Nazi?? I'm so !@#$ing confused.
Chef Jim Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Read this post back to yourself and try to figure out what a !@#$ing hypocrite you are. If by hypocrite you mean funny, I think I'd have to agree with you.
DC Tom Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Please Tom for the love of God what are you? Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Commie, Nazi?? I'm so !@#$ing confused. Is Narcissist a political party?
Chef Jim Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Is Narcissist a political party? Political party no. Politician? Every goddamn one of them.
Bad Lieutenant Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 It's not that I disagree with you. It's that you're an idiot. Your different viewpoint is based on you being facile and ignorant. I don't give a damn whether someone disagrees with me or not. I DO give a damn that their opinions aren't bull ****, regardless of whether I agree or disagree. If you and I were in complete agreement, I'd still denigrate you...because you're a moron. Wow, for all to see here on the board when DC Tom is out of ammo and/or doesn't like your viewpoint he starts to hurl insults. Way to go Tom, acting just like a typical greedy, selfish, pompous, name calling, venom spitting, irrational, pot stirring and filibustering rather than finding solutions republican. DC Tom Group: Members Posts: 23,120 Joined: 3-September 01 Member No.: 68 Fan in San Diego Group: Members Posts: 7,963 Joined: 3-September 01 Member No.: 77 I think DC Tom is testing out some of the material he's written for his upcoming one man stage act.
/dev/null Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 DC TomGroup: Members Posts: 23,120 Joined: 3-September 01 Member No.: 68 Fan in San Diego Group: Members Posts: 7,963 Joined: 3-September 01 Member No.: 77 I think DC Tom is testing out some of the material he's written for his upcoming one man stage act. Or maybe September 2001 was when the current incarnation of TSW came online and they were both among the first members
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Or maybe 3 September 2001 was around the time the current incarnation of TSW was developed. Damn you, common sense! DAMN YOU!!!!
DC Tom Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Or maybe September 2001 was when the current incarnation of TSW came online and they were both among the first members So you've finally admitted that there's at least ONE screen name that's not me. This has got to be a first.
/dev/null Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 So you've finally admitted that there's at least ONE screen name that's not me. This has got to be a first. There's 10k+ screen names on TSW, so there's bound to be at least a couple who aren't you. But most probably are. And I suspect Conner is just some Freudian mechanism that you have developed to compensate for some kind of insecurity, most likely phallic in nature
Bad Lieutenant Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Or maybe September 2001 was when the current incarnation of TSW came online and they were both among the first members Or maybe the chatter indicating otherwise is burning up the blogosphere while the circumstantial evidence suggesting that DC Tom and San Diego Fan share an identity continues to accumulate? We're through the looking glass here, people.
/dev/null Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Or maybe the chatter indicating otherwise is burning up the blogosphere while the circumstantial evidence suggesting that DC Tom and San Diego Fan share an identity continues to accumulate? We're through the looking glass here, people. Interesting theory but you're still lacking some substance Factor in Cruise missles at the Pentagon, George W Bush meeting Osama Bin Laden at a Frat Party in the basement of Skull and Bones, Haliburton's weather machine, and Dick Cheney in a french maid's outfit, and you might be on to something worthwhile
DC Tom Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 There's 10k+ screen names on TSW, so there's bound to be at least a couple who aren't you. But most probably are. And I suspect Conner is just some Freudian mechanism that you have developed to compensate for some kind of insecurity, most likely phallic in nature And half of them are software agents that I wrote.
/dev/null Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 And half of them are software agents that I wrote. I'm going to enjoy watching you die, Mr Anderson.
George Posted March 27, 2010 Posted March 27, 2010 If this atrocity ever does take hold then the United States will be turned into Cuba in very short order. Liberty killer, jobs killer, wealth killer, health killer. His next move will be to lead the charge of granting citizenship to 15 million mexicans living illegally in this country and get them into union jobs in an attempt to checkmate the 2012 election. Oh yeah, they will be added to the state run healthcare system also. We officially have a "Hugo Chavez" as our president until the REAL and very angry American citizens either vote him out in 2012 or he gets impeached by a 2011 republican led congress. As we saw in VA, NJ and MA, moderate and conservative Americans don't very much like their opinions to be given the back hand. It's this monumentally radical and liberal presidential disaster like the one we are witnessing, that will propel a very conservative and very populist Sarah Palin into the presidency. I didn't think this could ever seriously happen given what a polarizing figure she is, but now I can totally see this coming to fruition. She is the polar opposite of Obama. The commie-lovin liberals are going to get "slaughtered" this november. Maybe I was too quick to judge... it's just that there as so few true conservatives on this Friggin Liberal Board. Maybe you are worthy of some respect.
Recommended Posts