daquixers Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 Just for fun ... here is some interesting stats. Bledsoe through 10 games in 2003: _____________________________ 190 of 316 (60%) 6 TD's 8 Interceptions QB rating of 75.7 30 sacks 10 fumbles Bledsoe through 10 games in 2004: _____________________________ 148 of 264 (56.1%) 12 TD's 11 Interceptions QB rating of 77 26 sacks 5 fumbles So 4% off in passing - 6 more TD's - 3 more INT's - 2 points higher in QB rating - 4 less sacks - 5 less fumbles
stevestojan Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 So 4% off in passing - 6 more TD's - 3 more INT's - 2 points higher in QB rating - 4 less sacks - 5 less fumbles 135348[/snapback] Canton here he comes!!
nodnarb Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 same qb. But these coaches have him playing more efficiently, as the fewer attempts and more TDs indicates.
daquixers Posted November 28, 2004 Author Posted November 28, 2004 LMAO about the Canton, because that may be very true. Even though you were just trying to be a smart ass his years in NE and his first year with the Bills may just very well lead him to Canton. 38,612 yards 213 Touchdowns 176 Interceptions Those are just about Jim Kelly numbers ... except for the fact that Bledsoe has 3,000 more yards than Kelly.
justnzane Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 personally i believe for his years in NE and the first year here, that DB deserves to be enshrined in the hall. Before we picked him up, how many Bills fans were wishing that we had him instead of collins hobert, AVP, Flutie, or Johnson
Guest Guest Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 Just for fun ... here is some interesting stats. Bledsoe through 10 games in 2003: _____________________________ 190 of 316 (60%) 6 TD's 8 Interceptions QB rating of 75.7 30 sacks 10 fumbles Bledsoe through 10 games in 2004: _____________________________ 148 of 264 (56.1%) 12 TD's 11 Interceptions QB rating of 77 26 sacks 5 fumbles So 4% off in passing - 6 more TD's - 3 more INT's - 2 points higher in QB rating - 4 less sacks - 5 less fumbles 135348[/snapback] So he goes from Sh%& to Sh%& plus and what now, he's headed for the Pro Bowl... LMAO You sound like somebody that's been running around the jungle without food for two weeks that has just been sold a plate of slop for $200 as a gourmet meal. LOL
Nanker Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 So he goes from Sh%& to Sh%& plus and what now, he's headed for the Pro Bowl... LMAO You sound like somebody that's been running around the jungle without food for two weeks that has just been sold a plate of slop for $200 as a gourmet meal. LOL 135433[/snapback] Naw, Daquill is just the eternal optimist. The glass is always half full - never half empty. I give him credit for that. Look at the bright side of things. In the case of Drew, the glass is 15% full. See, doesn't THAT make you feel better now?
Rico Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 LMAO about the Canton, because that may be very true. Even though you were just trying to be a smart ass his years in NE and his first year with the Bills may just very well lead him to Canton. 38,612 yards 213 Touchdowns 176 Interceptions Those are just about Jim Kelly numbers ... except for the fact that Bledsoe has 3,000 more yards than Kelly. 135400[/snapback] Boomer Esiason 37,920 yards 247 TDs 184 Ints 1 AFC Championship win, 1 Super Bowl loss, winning record in playoffs. Been retired since 1997, not even one of the 7 QB preliminary finalists for the 2005 HOF.
ICE Posted November 28, 2004 Posted November 28, 2004 Just for fun ... here is some interesting stats. Bledsoe through 10 games in 2003: _____________________________ 190 of 316 (60%) 6 TD's 8 Interceptions QB rating of 75.7 30 sacks 10 fumbles Bledsoe through 10 games in 2004: _____________________________ 148 of 264 (56.1%) 12 TD's 11 Interceptions QB rating of 77 26 sacks 5 fumbles So 4% off in passing - 6 more TD's - 3 more INT's - 2 points higher in QB rating - 4 less sacks - 5 less fumbles 135348[/snapback] Both sets of numbers are nothing but average to below average at best. Both numbers are for a QB that can't lead a team, esp to WINS and WINNING seasons.
Recommended Posts