BuffaloBlood Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 If the Bills did this I would hang myself from the highest tree.
CarolinaBill Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 well hold on there cowboy, if we took spiller and got a 3rd or better for lynch it wouldnt be so bad now would it?
BuffaloBlood Posted March 19, 2010 Author Posted March 19, 2010 well hold on there cowboy, if we took spiller and got a 3rd or better for lynch it wouldnt be so bad now would it? Yes it would. We need big bodies and a QB. I dont care how good a RB looks I dont think you take one in the first round let alone the top 10. You can find RBs you cant find QBs and LTs. You need to take a guy who can be a cornerstone of your team when you have a top 10 pick. I hate the idea of a skill player right now until you have built your front 5 on the O and your front 7 on the D. Forget WRs and RBs....please please please draft a tackle!
HurlyBurly51 Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 well hold on there cowboy, if we took spiller and got a 3rd or better for lynch it wouldnt be so bad now would it? Uhh, yes it would. Have you learned nothing from the past mistakes? Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it I guess. That won't be the case with Nix, and why I'm glad armchair GM's aren't really running the show.
Gotta Dream Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 CJ Spiller is pretty impressive though. 4.24 speed. In contrast...Don Beebe ran a 4.21 and Reggie Bush ran a 4.33 He's ridiculous. He's got good size and great hands. He would be a game breaker and help captain checkdown tremendously. That being said, the Bills cannot afford a miss at the number 9 pick. They better pick a sure fire player and he's not the Adrian Peterson of this draft.
gflande1 Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 Thats the kind of pick a team makes if they are either on the verge, or want to stay in the basement. We have too many holes to fill to use a pick on a position we are atleast average at. In a year or two, maybe, not now
Omar Little Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 I can't believe anyone would be opposed to adding a tremendous offensive playmaker like Spiller on a team so lacking in playmakers. He would be an excellent pick.
WVUFootball29 Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 The NFL Networks Analysts are paid versions of half the posters on this board, lots of talk, not lots of knowledge
tombstone56 Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 I have rope for sale. give the rope to him free , i am rooting for mcclain, but i exspect a trade down. and get a nose tackle named williams
HurlyBurly51 Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 give the rope to him free , i am rooting for mcclain, but i exspect a trade down. and get a nose tackle named williams Let me spare you a little despair - they're not picking McLain.
btchrllebtchz Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 well hold on there cowboy, if we took spiller and got a 3rd or better for lynch it wouldnt be so bad now would it? a third round or better for lynch, hahaha, thats funny...please, be realistic
Simon Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 This just in: Charles Davis is an idiot. Actually Charles Davis is one of the most knowledgeable talking heads you'll find on any channel. I don't agree with him in this case but he certainly knows his business.
JPS Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 If Spiller is the next ______________________, would you then be interested???? Emmitt? Thurman? OJ? Barry? What would it take?? Like a good QB,
JPS Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 Sorry. Like a good QB, maybe a stellar playmaker makes everyone look better.
DarthICE Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 Well since they can't get a quality QB this year and apperantly are going to go with captain checkdown, doesn't it make sense to get a weapon that can take it all the way after trent throws the 2 yard passes to him?
Estro Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 Well since they can't get a quality QB this year and apperantly are going to go with captain checkdown, doesn't it make sense to get a weapon that can take it all the way after trent throws the 2 yard passes to him? You actually make a valid point there. If our front office views this guy as the next Chris Johnson and he turns out to be that you can't complain about a pick like that. If he's head and shoulders abover the rest as far as best player available then you have to at least consider him. They did set up a visit with him didn't they?
Simon Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 Well since they can't get a quality QB this year and apperantly are going to go with captain checkdown, doesn't it make sense to get a weapon that can take it all the way after trent throws the 2 yard passes to him? There's about 8 QB threads on the front page and you've got to bring your QB stuff into this thread? You're rapidly approaching crusading status. Again.
Meark Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 Spiller is a play maker and looks like he can score every time he touches the ball. I wouldn't be upset if we drafted him. Take an OT at #41 and trade Lynch for a 3rd or 4th round pick. You don't get a chance to draft a player like Spiller often and there is no QB that I would take over him besides maybe Bradford. Is there going to be a sure fire starting LT or NT #9??
Recommended Posts