John Adams Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 Good for Roberts. It is perfectly fine for the President to criticize the Court but it is not OK to lead a rally in their face when the very nature of the Court is that it is not supposed to react. Obama !@#$ed up. Roberts on Tuesday said people have a right to respond to what the courts do, but context should be considered. "Some people, I think, have an obligation to criticize what we do, given their office, if they think we've done something [wrong]," he said in response to a student's question. "So I have no problems with that. On the other hand, there is the issue of the setting, the circumstances and the decorum. The image of having the members of one branch of government standing up, literally surrounding the Supreme Court, cheering and hollering, while the court, according to the requirements of protocol, has to sit there, expressionless, I think is very troubling." http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/03/10/obama.supremecourt/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 Why is it okay? Because the president is black? If it was Bush or Clinton would you say the same thing? Racist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 Why is it okay? Because the president is black? If it was Bush or Clinton would you say the same thing? Racist. On a serious note, I agree with you completely JA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted March 11, 2010 Author Share Posted March 11, 2010 Why is it okay? Because the president is black? If it was Bush or Clinton would you say the same thing? Racist. Wake up 8 white Justices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 Obama said, "With all due deference to the separation of powers, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests -- including foreign corporations -- to spend without limit in our elections." That was a statement of fact of the consequences of the decision. If Roberts took it as criticism, then maybe his conscience over screwing up the Presidential oath was bothering him. And 4 of his fellow justices agreed with Obama when they dissented from the conservatives on the court. If he's that thin skinned, then he should pull a Palin and quit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 Obama said, "With all due deference to the separation of powers, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests -- including foreign corporations -- to spend without limit in our elections." That was a statement of fact of the consequences of the decision. If Roberts took it as criticism, then maybe his conscience over screwing up the Presidential oath was bothering him. And 4 of his fellow justices agreed with Obama when they dissented from the conservatives on the court. If he's that thin skinned, then he should pull a Palin and quit. I guess you must have missed the part when Justice Roberts said "Some people, I think, have an obligation to criticize what we do, given their office, if they think we've done something [wrong]," he said in response to a student's question. "So I have no problems with that. On the other hand, there is the issue of the setting, the circumstances and the decorum. The image of having the members of one branch of government standing up, literally surrounding the Supreme Court, cheering and hollering, while the court, according to the requirements of protocol, has to sit there, expressionless, I think is very troubling." What Obama did was unprecedented and beneath what I would expect out of the president. Actually it was classless, and let me add that there 5 justices that ruled in favor of the decision. So let's see here, 5 is more than 4, which means that 5 is the majority. Sour grapes, and that the only other purpose of this attack from Obama was to try to win political points, mainly for his liberal base. So this is basically a case of "You started it". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted March 11, 2010 Author Share Posted March 11, 2010 I guess you must have missed the part when Justice Roberts said What Obama did was unprecedented and beneath what I would expect out of the president. Actually it was classless, and let me add that there 5 justices that ruled in favor of the decision. So let's see here, 5 is more than 4, which means that 5 is the majority. Sour grapes, and that the only other purpose of this attack from Obama was to try to win political points, mainly for his liberal base. So this is basically a case of "You started it". I cringed when he said it. It's like when people shout at police officers. The police are not supposed to react and the person shouting looks like a total douche. That's what Obama did. Alito's reaction was the moment when the cop breaks his stony face and says "!@#$ you." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 Wake up 8 white Justices. Wrong. There's 7 White Justices, a Black Dude, and a Wise Latina Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 Obama said, "With all due deference to the separation of powers, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests -- including foreign corporations -- to spend without limit in our elections." That was a statement of fact of the consequences of the decision. If Roberts took it as criticism, then maybe his conscience over screwing up the Presidential oath was bothering him. And 4 of his fellow justices agreed with Obama when they dissented from the conservatives on the court. If he's that thin skinned, then he should pull a Palin and quit. Man have I ever walked a mile in Obama's shoes on that one. I repeatedly say that I have as much or more respect for old people than anyone, but if I point out a minor flaw, I get lambasted. This is the exact same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted March 11, 2010 Author Share Posted March 11, 2010 Wrong. There's 7 White Justices, a Black Dude, and a Wise Latina Forgot about the Wise Latina. She's new. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 Wrong. There's 7 White Justices, an Uncle Tom, and a Wise Latina FIXED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 Obama said, "With all due deference to the separation of powers, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests -- including foreign corporations -- to spend without limit in our elections." That was a statement of fact of the consequences of the decision. If Roberts took it as criticism, then maybe his conscience over screwing up the Presidential oath was bothering him. And 4 of his fellow justices agreed with Obama when they dissented from the conservatives on the court. If he's that thin skinned, then he should pull a Palin and quit. I have to ask you all...do I sound this this idiot when I post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 I have to ask you all...do I sound this this idiot when I post? No, you're obviously way worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 No, you're obviously way worse. OK, can someone NOT from the Planet Mongo now answer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 OK, can someone NOT from the Planet Mongo now answer? Perhaps you should reread your original question out loud. And what's wrong with Mongolians? Do you ever use the word Monger? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 I cringed when he said it. It's like when people shout at police officers. The police are not supposed to react and the person shouting looks like a total douche. That's what Obama did. Alito's reaction was the moment when the cop breaks his stony face and says "!@#$ you." Decorum from the top of both legislative branches were violated, hell, the leaders from all our legislative branches are lacking integrity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC-Bills Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 I have to ask you all...do I sound this this idiot when I post? Quite frequently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 I have to ask you all...do I sound this this idiot when I post? You sound like twice the idiot...what with the echo... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 I cringed when he said it. It's like when people shout at police officers. The police are not supposed to react and the person shouting looks like a total douche. That's what Obama did. Alito's reaction was the moment when the cop breaks his stony face and says "!@#$ you." I did as well. You know when somebody says something dopey in a meeting...that awkward silence right after? That's what it felt like. Then, the idiot insult to the idiot injury were those supposedly grown men and women in the cabinet acting like they were hazing a Dolphin fan at a bar. Immature. Classless. But honestly, given how they have been acting since Bush won in 2000? Not that surprising. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 FIXED That was what I had originally posted but I edited it in case somebody without a sarcasm-o-meter took offense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts