Tsaikotic Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 PFT Shaun Rogers could be a good NT for a few years while a draft pick develops...wonder what pick they would want or maybe a player we have for him...Whitner and a 6th and 7th maybe??
Astrobot Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 Do we have a RD2 or OLine guy or QB? 'Cause that's what they'd want.
/dev/null Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 We should do a Chris Spielman type trade and they send us Rogers for Past Considerations
bkc Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 Do we have a RD2 or OLine guy or QB? 'Cause that's what they'd want. i don't think they want high pick , they got him for a third and the bloom is off the rose. I bet 4th gets it done. That said he is not the answer
High Mark Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 This was confirmed by ESPN. They are actively seeking to trade him is what I took from it. We need help Buddy.
Magox Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 I would hope that we would at least explore the possibility. In my little imaginary world, a 5th and Donte would be ideal
Paup 1995MVP Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 i don't think they want high pick , they got him for a third and the bloom is off the rose. I bet 4th gets it done. That said he is not the answer Why is he not the answer? The guy is big, can move reasonably for a man his size, and has a bad attitude. He certainly IS part of the answer.
freester Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 Why is he not the answer? The guy is big, can move reasonably for a man his size, and has a bad attitude. He certainly IS part of the answer. Shaun Rogers would be a great signing. I would trade Whitner and McCargo for him in a heartbeat. We need bigger LB and D Line to play a 3-4.
bills_red Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 No, I don't want to trade for him he is what 31 now? Plus there is a reason they want to move him the back-up played a lot better than he did, plus they traded their starting DE away they will just move Rogers over to DE imo.
bkc Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 I would hope that we would at least explore the possibility. In my little imaginary world, a 5th and Donte would be ideal I like that world
BADOLBILZ Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 PFT Shaun Rogers could be a good NT for a few years while a draft pick develops...wonder what pick they would want or maybe a player we have for him...Whitner and a 6th and 7th maybe?? Depends on George Edwards' vision of the 3-4. Rogers is a load, but he is not a typical two-gap NT. He will draw a lot of double teams and make some plays in the backfield. But if you have a NT like Rogers, you probably need some large, powerful ILB's to pick up some of that gap responsibility. Poz doesn't really fit that description, but I'm not sure Poz is all that great of a fit in any kind of 3-4.
Tasmo Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 Why is he not the answer? The guy is big, can move reasonably for a man his size, and has a bad attitude. He certainly IS part of the answer. Deep class this year in the draft. Guys a freelancer from a losing team.
Astrobot Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 Depends on George Edwards' vision of the 3-4. Rogers is a load, but he is not a typical two-gap NT. He will draw a lot of double teams and make some plays in the backfield. But if you have a NT like Rogers, you probably need some large, powerful ILB's to pick up some of that gap responsibility. Poz doesn't really fit that description, but I'm not sure Poz is all that great of a fit in any kind of 3-4. Finally a reason to draft Spikes in RD2!
evilcape Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 Rogers is a huge nasty man. 6-4, 350.....he can plug some holes. Yes i know he is almost 31, but he can still be a force for another 3-4 years, then still be a veteran backup for a couple years past that. The guy has blocked a boat-load of PATS and field goals. I would love to trade DW and a 6th for him.
sllib olaffub Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 It'd be a lot easier to say "no, don't bother with this guy" if we knew that the F.O. had a real plan for the draft - in the sense that they believe they can fill their holes with it. If they did believe that, then I'd understand not pursuing any of these options, but, if they are thinking that they'll just let the holes remain until next year - whatever they can't fill this year in the draft - basically saying we'll be o.k. with losing this year because we'll have next years draft, too - kinda like counting two drafts and forgetting about this year - then forget it, they should be looking to add some playmakers at need spots. As a fan, I'm not feeling good about the prospects of sitting through a miserable, uncompetitive year so they can have another draft to "rebuild". Hopefully they plan on fielding a competitive team this year.
Rob's House Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 No, I don't want to trade for him he is what 31 now? Plus there is a reason they want to move him the back-up played a lot better than he did, plus they traded their starting DE away they will just move Rogers over to DE imo. Only the finest for us. I'll take nothing short of Wilfork w/ Dan Williams and Cody competing to be his backup.
DarthICE Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 I say for a 4th or lower then I get him, if they want a 1-3 forget it
Green Lightning Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 I say for a 4th or lower then I get him, if they want a 1-3 forget it +1
Rob's House Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 Guys a freelancer from a losing team. So was Leigh Bodden
Recommended Posts