Alaska Darin Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Discuss I haven't had a chance to do more than look at the titles...
DC Tom Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Nutjob site. Kept expecting to run into an article about the mind-controlling properties of flouridated water.
Alaska Darin Posted March 5, 2010 Author Posted March 5, 2010 Nutjob site. Kept expecting to run into an article about the mind-controlling properties of flouridated water. I don't doubt it - it was a link someone sent me. BTW, flouridated water is far too yeasty.
GG Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 I think it was misisng a link to the Pentagon police conspiracy.
Bishop Hedd Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Discuss I haven't had a chance to do more than look at the titles... I can tell because you obviously didn't look at the year. Any particular reason you chose to post 08 instead of 10? http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories...d-and-ten-book/ I think project censored does good mentioning the stories the corporate media, for whatever reason, won't cover. I know probably none of the stories listed even make the slightest blip on a board like this but what the fuk...surprise me.
Alaska Darin Posted March 5, 2010 Author Posted March 5, 2010 I can tell because you obviously didn't look at the year. Any particular reason you chose to post 08 instead of 10? http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories...d-and-ten-book/ I think project censored does good mentioning the stories the corporate media, for whatever reason, won't cover. I know probably none of the stories listed even make the slightest blip on a board like this but what the fuk...surprise me. Uh, I posted the year in the !@#$ing title. That makes it pretty clear for the lucid. As I said earlier, I received the link in an email. I hadn't had time to look at any of the stories or subsequent years. That also should be obvious to anyone with a half a clue.
DC Tom Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Uh, I posted the year in the !@#$ing title. That makes it pretty clear for the lucid. As I said earlier, I received the link in an email. I hadn't had time to look at any of the stories or subsequent years. That also should be obvious to anyone with a half a clue. And if you had to pick the poster most likely to be labelled an incoherent half-wit who takes conspiracy sites seriously, who'd be your first guess...?
Alaska Darin Posted March 5, 2010 Author Posted March 5, 2010 And if you had to pick the poster most likely to be labelled an incoherent half-wit who takes conspiracy sites seriously, who'd be your first guess...? Why do you think I posted the link in the first place?
drnykterstein Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Nutjob site. Kept expecting to run into an article about the mind-controlling properties of flouridated water. I'm curious, can you pick out just one of their stories that you think is false? One incorrect story on their part would be sufficient to strongly discredit them.
DC Tom Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 I'm curious, can you pick out just one of their stories that you think is false? One incorrect story on their part would be sufficient to strongly discredit them. And Darin, who would be your second guess...? Conner, I'm not going to play this game with you again. If you're really stupid enough to think habeus corpus was suspended for "every person" in 2008, or Bush declared martial law, or AFRICOM was formed to rape African natural resources, go right ahead. I'll laugh at you, but I won't stop you.
Bishop Hedd Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Uh, I posted the year in the !@#$ing title. That makes it pretty clear for the lucid. As I said earlier, I received the link in an email. I hadn't had time to look at any of the stories or subsequent years. That also should be obvious to anyone with a half a clue. Once..again...is...there...any...reason..why...you...posted...the...list...for.. .08...instead...of...this...year? Well beside the obvious which is you're completely lost. Even better, why don't you tell the people why you posted it to begin with?
Bishop Hedd Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 I'm curious, can you pick out just one of their stories that you think is false? One incorrect story on their part would be sufficient to strongly discredit them. Don't hold your breath for toolbox tommie or Potsie to get back to you on that one. I'm still waiting for a list of murders that Earth First supposedly has commited from the dumbnamic duo from Rachacha. Maybe if you mention Acorn you might get a bite and some play. The one overlooked story that caught my attention on the list concerned the questionable death of the guy who threw Ohio for Bush in '04. Didn't know that one...obviously.
DC Tom Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Once..again...is...there...any...reason..why...you...posted...the...list...for...08...instead...of...this...year? Well beside the obvious which is you're completely lost. He already answered that. Because the link was emailed to him.
drnykterstein Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 And Darin, who would be your second guess...? Conner, I'm not going to play this game with you again. If you're really stupid enough to think habeus corpus was suspended for "every person" in 2008, or Bush declared martial law, or AFRICOM was formed to rape African natural resources, go right ahead. I'll laugh at you, but I won't stop you. Lol. I don't know what about that post made you think I was trusting or not trusting them. I've never even heard of AFRICOM before.. so how can I know what they did or didn't do?
DC Tom Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Lol. I don't know what about that post made you think I was trusting or not trusting them. I've never even heard of AFRICOM before.. so how can I know what they did or didn't do? So you asked me to prove that something you haven't read is crap? Seriously...what the !@#$ is wrong with you?
KD in CA Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 So you asked me to prove that something you haven't read is crap? Seriously...what the !@#$ is wrong with you? You know the rules. No using arguments that are beyond conner's intellectual capacity.
Jim in Anchorage Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 And Darin, who would be your second guess...? Conner, I'm not going to play this game with you again. If you're really stupid enough to think habeus corpus was suspended for "every person" in 2008, or Bush declared martial law, or AFRICOM was formed to rape African natural resources, go right ahead. I'll laugh at you, but I won't stop you. Damn you just beat me to that. That's win, show-place? I got money on pbills.
/dev/null Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 You know the rules. No using arguments that are beyond conner's intellectual capacity. Let me consult the English to Conner Translator
Bishop Hedd Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 He already answered that. Because the link was emailed to him. Oh so he's just throwing links up on the Big Board hither and yon, sight-unseen? Gotcha! I'll start doin' that. This link is of one of the oscar nominated animated short features that my brother in law sent me today. http://current.com/1erg44c
Recommended Posts