DC Tom Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 Ok. What part of me already stating that didn't you get? The part where you said she was UNqualified. Which is it?
pBills Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 The part where you said she was UNqualified. Which is it? Dear lord. I have stated in this post a LONG time ago she was qualified. Though not understanding why anyone in their right mind give her their vote. QUOTE (/dev/null @ Mar 1 2010, 12:58 PM) pBills has just declared that Sarah Palin is qualified to be President Of course she is. Doesn't mean she is smart enough to be President.
DC Tom Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 Dear lord. I have stated in this post a LONG time ago she was qualified. Though not understanding why anyone in their right mind give her their vote. I linked to the post where you specifically said a year ago that she was unqualified. I'll do it again... Sarah Palin - was she or is she qualified for the VP spot. In my opinion, no. She does not come across as a very bright person. So which is it? Is she qualified, or not?
pBills Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 I linked to the post where you specifically said a year ago that she was unqualified. I'll do it again... So which is it? Is she qualified, or not? AGAIN... QUOTE (/dev/null @ Mar 1 2010, 12:58 PM) pBills has just declared that Sarah Palin is qualified to be President Of course she is. Doesn't mean she is smart enough to be President.
pBills Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 Did you understand that this time Tom? Of course she is qualified by what is stated within the Constitution. However, that does not mean she is actually smart enough to handle the position... and why anyone would give her a vote is beyond me.
DC Tom Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 AGAIN... And again...you said she was unqualified a year ago. So were you wrong then, or are you wrong now?
pBills Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 And again...you said she was unqualified a year ago. So were you wrong then, or are you wrong now? I was wrong then. Feel better? She is qualified. Just not smart enough to receive votes or manage the position.
keepthefaith Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 I was wrong then. Feel better? She is qualified. Just not smart enough to receive votes or manage the position. We need a new set of liberals on this board. The current crop is worn out.
pBills Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 We need a new set of liberals on this board. The current crop is worn out. True. Not many people can deal with the one-sided BS here for to long.
DC Tom Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 I was wrong then. Feel better? She is qualified. Just not smart enough to receive votes or manage the position. Do I feel better? Do YOU feel better? You just admitted that most of us here are qualified for President. So I can count on your vote in two years?
IDBillzFan Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 Really Tom... ask her what the role of the VP is. See if she knows this time. We should do the same with Biden. Ask him if he knows what the role of the VP is and see if he he knows this time, given how he screwed up his answer during the VP debate. Now that he realizes he doesn't really need to do anything, and that being VP is easy, maybe he's had time to review which article of the Constitution covers the Executive Branch.
pBills Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 Do I feel better? Do YOU feel better? You just admitted that most of us here are qualified for President. So I can count on your vote in two years? No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. If you are over 35 and natural born citizen you qualify to run for presidency. Will I vote for you? Negative.
/dev/null Posted March 1, 2010 Author Posted March 1, 2010 If you are over 35 and natural born citizen you qualify to run for presidency. Will I vote for you? Negative. What if he was running against Dick Cheney?
Joe Miner Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 If you are over 35 and natural born citizen you qualify to run for presidency. Will I vote for you? Negative. But he hasn't been in the Washington politics, has an outstanding education, has probably worked directly with middle-class and lower class people, and some would say he can be very inspiring. He seems to check out on your stringent candidate qualification checklist. You might want to reconsider. I think DC Tom as a candidate will meet all your presidential needs. Is it the catchphrase that's holding your vote back? C'mon Tom, get a snappy catchphrase together. And I don't think "I told you so" will generate the same magic that "Yes we can" did.
DC Tom Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 But he hasn't been in the Washington politics, has an outstanding education, has probably worked directly with middle-class and lower class people, and some would say he can be very inspiring. He seems to check out on your stringent candidate qualification checklist. You might want to reconsider. I think DC Tom as a candidate will meet all your presidential needs. Is it the catchphrase that's holding your vote back? C'mon Tom, get a snappy catchphrase together. And I don't think "I told you so" will generate the same magic that "Yes we can" did. Given pBills' flip-flop on Palin's qualification, I was thinking of going with "Belief you can Change in."
keepthefaith Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 Given pBills' flip-flop on Palin's qualification, I was thinking of going with "Belief you can Change in." Or Briefs you can change into
3rdnlng Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 Or Briefs you can change into Or............................Chains R Us
IDBillzFan Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 Or Briefs you can change into Given how many people are crapping their pants with the way this administration is running things, this could be a winning campaign.
Alaska Darin Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 True. Not many people can deal with the one-sided BS here for to long. Too. And it has nothing to do with one side.
Recommended Posts