Chuckknox Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 This gives them more than enough weapons to make an offense this year
Rust Belt Nights Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 This gives them more than enough weapons to make an offense this year How? We still need an offensive line.
Wilson from Gamehendge Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 This gives them more than enough weapons to make an offense this year Please stop posting. http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?showtopic=108811 http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?showtopic=108813 2 Tebow threads and 2 T.O. threads...couldn't have been put together to form 1 post? The fact you wanna draft Tebow and sign a LT to protect him, really shows your intelligence.
fishgrappler Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 I agree...that was a pretty bad post. We cant get the ball to T.O. enough to make him worth while and we have Lynch and Freddie. You must spend your money foolishly!
ACor58 Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 Just like your 3 crappy threads in a row. Please stop or you will soon be known as Suckknox
jj____ Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 horrible, just horrible. why would we keep to? why would we take snaps away from marshawn or fred and give them to a mediocore back who cant finish a season. god this thread just made me sooooo f-ing mad
It's in My Blood Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 Some people get so hung up on "names" that they lose whatever football smarts they might of had , if any to begin with. TO and Westbrook are shells of their former selves and Tebow is not the answer in my opinion. Trade for Mcnabb and make the O-line priority.
manbeast Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 horrible, just horrible. why would we keep to? why would we take snaps away from marshawn or fred and give them to a mediocore back who cant finish a season. god this thread just made me sooooo f-ing mad Can't argue with the injuries but he averaged 4.5 yards a carry I believe and he is a great reciever out of the back field. Please stop posting with out actually doing your homework.
manbeast Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 Some people get so hung up on "names" that they lose whatever football smarts they might of had , if any to begin with. TO and Westbrook are shells of their former selves and Tebow is not the answer in my opinion. Trade for Mcnabb and make the O-line priority. People on these boards get so hung up on their baseless opinions. Westbrook suffered from injury. 4.5 yrds per carry last year. TO was on a team that couldn't get the ball to its recievers now I do think TO either needs to be dedicated to his celeb Future or football there is not enuff room for both. I haven't played football on a regular basis for a while and I drop alot of balls that I used to catch. I am starting to like Tebow but I would not spend our current 1 or 2 on him. I definitely agree with the last statement.
manbeast Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 How? We still need an offensive line. No this Offensive scheme calls for only three players in hopes that we can use extra men on defence to stop the run.
KD in CA Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 Tebow, TO and Westbrook - new Bills offense, They can add these 3 easy You forgot Walter Jones. LT problem solved!!
Jim in Anchorage Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 Some people get so hung up on "names" that they lose whatever football smarts they might of had , if any to begin with. TO and Westbrook are shells of their former selves and Tebow is not the answer in my opinion. Trade for Mcnabb and make the O-line priority. Then you go on to recommend Mcnabb
Recommended Posts