Chuckknox Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 He's worth it in entertainment value alone.
KD in CA Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 Winning teams aren't built on 'entertainment value'. Or on over-the-hill WRs with bad hands. Pass
coldstorage5 Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 He's worth it in entertainment value alone.They wont do it. next year could be a strike, so the Bills might pacy for another year 1 maybe 5 ot 6 million ... 10 mill for 3 years wont happen
SawchukBills Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 1 year maybe...BIG maybe...but definitely not 3
iinii Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 Winning teams aren't built on 'entertainment value'. Or on over-the-hill WRs with bad hands. Pass No pun intended?
BillnutinHouston Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 I'd sign him for 1 year at 3 mil, max.
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 One year was enough... have fun elsewhere.
Gibran Chandan Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 He's worth it in entertainment value alone. link, or opinion?
Lori Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 [This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive subject lines. The topic starter can edit the subject line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.
Recommended Posts