BeastMode54 Posted February 26, 2010 Posted February 26, 2010 Would that leave the door open for him in Buffalo?
PDaDdy Posted February 26, 2010 Posted February 26, 2010 I sure as hell hope not. Me too. I say lets stick with the crap we have at QB. Who needs a potentially dynamic play making QB who possibly still has 4.3 speed and has to be accounted for on every snap of the ball.
JStranger76 Posted February 26, 2010 Posted February 26, 2010 Vick is a phenominal athlete no doubt, but a lousy ass QB.
BeastMode54 Posted February 26, 2010 Author Posted February 26, 2010 Vick is a phenominal athlete no doubt, but a lousy ass QB. I agree that maybe he's not a great QB, but I keep remembering the fact that he took a mediocre team to the playoffs a few years ago with no WR's, no RB and a not so great line. So if he could replicate that, I'm all for it
JStranger76 Posted February 26, 2010 Posted February 26, 2010 While we're at it lets just stop in it's tracks any potential room for developement with Nelson, Hardy and the legend that never was Steve Johnson. That's what would happen with Vick at QB.
JStranger76 Posted February 26, 2010 Posted February 26, 2010 If it didn't require a trade this would be a completely different story.........
BeastMode54 Posted February 26, 2010 Author Posted February 26, 2010 While we're at it lets just stop in it's tracks any potential room for developement with Nelson, Hardy and the legend that never was Steve Johnson. That's what would happen with Vick at QB. Didn't think of it that way. You might be right there
JStranger76 Posted February 26, 2010 Posted February 26, 2010 No draft pick and special formations would be the only way I would do it. As a full time QB it would only hurt the team in the long run.......speaking of special formations (wildcat I guess), stop lining up guys like Chad Pennington at WR please!!! It's kind of demeaning the the non athletic QB.
CarolinaBill Posted February 26, 2010 Posted February 26, 2010 Vick is a phenominal athlete no doubt, but a lousy ass QB. +1 terrible qb's don't help develop young receivers, Just say no to Vick
Jerry Jabber Posted February 26, 2010 Posted February 26, 2010 +1 terrible qb's don't help develop young receivers, Just say no to Vick Agreed!!!
BufflaloBeastMode23 Posted February 26, 2010 Posted February 26, 2010 HERE WE GO AGAIN...LOL.. Yes, if the RAMS GET ANY QB that leaves us Mike Vezzy without a doubt ...AND I WOULD GO CRAZY...I hope we do get vick...id be first in line to get that jersey early in the morning...hell and id get opening day tickets too..HAHAHA... He's Better than pigpen, Better than brohm and Better than Noodle arm Pennington too...HAHAHA...LETS GO MIKE....
DarthICE Posted February 26, 2010 Posted February 26, 2010 Me too. I say lets stick with the crap we have at QB. Who needs a potentially dynamic play making QB who possibly still has 4.3 speed and has to be accounted for on every snap of the ball. We do but Vick isn't that player you describe and he sure as hell hasn't ever been a good QUARTERBACK.
DarthICE Posted February 26, 2010 Posted February 26, 2010 HERE WE GO AGAIN...LOL.. Yes, if the RAMS GET ANY QB that leaves us Mike Vezzy without a doubt ...AND I WOULD GO CRAZY...I hope we do get vick...id be first in line to get that jersey early in the morning...hell and id get opening day tickets too..HAHAHA... He's Better than pigpen, Better than brohm and Better than Noodle arm Pennington too...HAHAHA...LETS GO MIKE.... Of course you would. You are all about wanting every punk we can get on this team. Marshawn, Vick...
Mr. WEO Posted February 26, 2010 Posted February 26, 2010 I agree that maybe he's not a great QB, but I keep remembering the fact that he took a mediocre team to the playoffs a few years ago with no WR's, no RB and a not so great line. So if he could replicate that, I'm all for it Rex Grossman?
Recommended Posts