Beerball Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 link On the heels of a revelation that a professional rugby player in Britain has tested positive for Human Growth Hormone (HGH), the NFL has proposed blood testing its players for HGH, the Washington Post reports. The NFL currently has HGH on its list of banned substances, but does not test for it. “Our position is that HGH blood-testing has advanced to the point where we are taking steps to incorporate it into our program,” said Greg Aiello, the NFL’s senior vice president of public relations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthICE Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 link LMAO funny how the NFLPA is against it. Of course they are, it is the last thing they can put in their bodies and not lose tons of money through suspensions over. I hope they implement it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 LMAO funny how the NFLPA is against it. Hey, needles hurt! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 If Dwight Freeney had tested positive for steroids after the superbowl, what should the penalty have been? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conch Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 The union should be for a level playing field so that non-users are not at a competitive disadvantage with the cheaters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts