dwight in philly Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 Don't let some of these guys get you down Dwight...your taking a pounding because of your opinion. The world is a very sensitive place. No one wants to hear something they disagree with, let alone stated strongly. There is a lot of back-and-forth in this post and others, which I enjoy reading, but the "you're a moron!" posts are so hypocritical. I really feel for you on the punctuation police. Those barbs must have hurt badly. thank you, i do enjoy the back and forth, but it seems lots on here get testy if you express an opinion they do not agree with, never expected the backlash.
DC Tom Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 thank you, i do enjoy the back and forth, but it seems lots on here get testy if you express an opinion they do not agree with, never expected the backlash. It's not that no one agreed with it. It's that it was a stupid opinion. A liberal conspiracy to keep the US-Canada hockey game from being shown in HD? The backlash isn't about your political beliefs, it's about you being a moron.
dwight in philly Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 It's not that no one agreed with it. It's that it was a stupid opinion. A liberal conspiracy to keep the US-Canada hockey game from being shown in HD? The backlash isn't about your political beliefs, it's about you being a moron. ?.. moron?.. i was expressing an opinion , not a political belief. it was never said it was a "liberal conspiracy"point missed!. my opinion is that nbc is clueless essentially, and coincidently in the tank for obama. draw your own conclusions. then it became me being a "jackass", and as you say "a moron" . just felt i should defend myself. but go ahead, if you get your jollies by calling people names, go for it!..
DC Tom Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 ?.. moron?.. i was expressing an opinion , not a political belief. it was never said it was a "liberal conspiracy"point missed!. my opinion is that nbc is clueless essentially, and coincidently in the tank for obama. draw your own conclusions. then it became me being a "jackass", and as you say "a moron" . just felt i should defend myself. but go ahead, if you get your jollies by calling people names, go for it!.. You were expressing a stupid opinion. Blaming SD coverage of a hockey game on the Obama Administration? You choke on a hot dog as a kid or something? And yes, while you're entitled to express an opionion, even a stupid one, we're also entitled to beat you like a rented mule for being an idiot.
KD in CA Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 It's not that no one agreed with it. It's that it was a stupid opinion. A liberal conspiracy to keep the US-Canada hockey game from being shown in HD? The backlash isn't about your political beliefs, it's about you being a moron. [/thread] Hopefully.
dwight in philly Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 You were expressing a stupid opinion. Blaming SD coverage of a hockey game on the Obama Administration? You choke on a hot dog as a kid or something? And yes, while you're entitled to express an opionion, even a stupid one, we're also entitled to beat you like a rented mule for being an idiot. i can express an opinion, is that what you are saying?, but if YOU think it is a stupid one, meaning an opinion you disagree with, you then assume i am an idiot?.. is that what you are saying?.. i would say "i rest my case" to that, but have a feeling i may have to further defend myself, or perhaps, just let people see who the idiots are!
DC Tom Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 i can express an opinion, is that what you are saying?, but if YOU think it is a stupid one, meaning an opinion you disagree with, you then assume i am an idiot?.. is that what you are saying?.. i would say "i rest my case" to that, but have a feeling i may have to further defend myself, or perhaps, just let people see who the idiots are! No, you can express an opinion, but if it's a stupid opinion I'll assume you're an idiot whether I agree or disagree with it. I mean, really...an Obama/Olbermann liberal conspiracy against televising hockey in HD? Did you stop and think for even a half-second how utterly ridiculous that sounds? Either you didn't...and not thinking before you spout off makes you an idiot. Or you did...and you failed to realize how utterly ridiculous that sounds, which makes you an idiot. Either way...idiot.
Nervous Guy Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 No, you can express an opinion, but if it's a stupid opinion I'll assume you're an idiot whether I agree or disagree with it. I mean, really...an Obama/Olbermann liberal conspiracy against televising hockey in HD? Did you stop and think for even a half-second how utterly ridiculous that sounds? Either you didn't...and not thinking before you spout off makes you an idiot. Or you did...and you failed to realize how utterly ridiculous that sounds, which makes you an idiot. Either way...idiot. hard to refute that one. Advantage DC.
LeviF Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 hard to refute that one. Advantage DC. I think that went without saying, from the very beginning.
DC Tom Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 I think that went without saying, from the very beginning. And you sent up the DC Tom signal. Hope you're happy now.
dwight in philly Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 No, you can express an opinion, but if it's a stupid opinion I'll assume you're an idiot whether I agree or disagree with it. I mean, really...an Obama/Olbermann liberal conspiracy against televising hockey in HD? Did you stop and think for even a half-second how utterly ridiculous that sounds? Either you didn't...and not thinking before you spout off makes you an idiot. Or you did...and you failed to realize how utterly ridiculous that sounds, which makes you an idiot. Either way...idiot. i respectfully disagree. again, for the umpteenth time, i did not in any way say, nbc not televising the hockey game on the main channel and it being a conspiracy . i said, nbc just does not get it!.. how could they possibly not realize that the game is important enough to put on the main channel?(regardless of the popularity of hockey, this game trancends that). my point was essentially that nbc is a liberal network, THEY ADMIT IT!. just reinforces my opinion that as out of touch that liberals are, so is nbc by not "getting it" as far as putting the game on the regular feed.
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 OMG! What has this thread become. I leave for half a day and my post count is severely slipping! Anyway... I was talking to a friend and they don't get MSNBC... WTF is that about! How in the hell did you watch SWE-FIN!
DC Tom Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 i respectfully disagree. again, for the umpteenth time, i did not in any way say, nbc not televising the hockey game on the main channel and it being a conspiracy . i said, nbc just does not get it!.. how could they possibly not realize that the game is important enough to put on the main channel?(regardless of the popularity of hockey, this game trancends that). my point was essentially that nbc is a liberal network, THEY ADMIT IT!. just reinforces my opinion that as out of touch that liberals are, so is nbc by not "getting it" as far as putting the game on the regular feed. Oh, so it's not a liberal conspiracy, it's just the liberal's fault. Yeah, that's a LOT more rational. You know what would really help you make your point? Cease being an idiot.
dwight in philly Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 i respectfully disagree. again, for the umpteenth time, i did not in any way say, nbc not televising the hockey game on the main channel and it being a conspiracy . i said, nbc just does not get it!.. how could they possibly not realize that the game is important enough to put on the main channel?(regardless of the popularity of hockey, this game trancends that). my point was essentially that nbc is a liberal network, THEY ADMIT IT!. just reinforces my opinion that as out of touch that liberals are, so is nbc by not "getting it" as far as putting the game on the regular feed. one more thing, now if you disagree with my premise that liberals are out of touch, fair game, have at me! but do not call me an idiot when YOU, miss the friggin point!
dwight in philly Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 Oh, so it's not a liberal conspiracy, it's just the liberal's fault. Yeah, that's a LOT more rational. You know what would really help you make your point? Cease being an idiot. point missed.. sorry..
DC Tom Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 point missed.. sorry.. No, I got the point. The liberals are out of touch, as evidenced by a standard-def broadcast of an Olympic hockey game. Fox would have broadcast it in HD, no doubt. You're really not helping yourself, bonehead.
LeviF Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 And you sent up the DC Tom signal. Hope you're happy now. This kind of thing is always an enjoyable experience.
dwight in philly Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 Oh, so it's not a liberal conspiracy, it's just the liberal's fault. Yeah, that's a LOT more rational. You know what would really help you make your point? Cease being an idiot. just curious, you are in D C?.. this isnt rahm emmanul is it?
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 And you sent up the DC Tom signal. Hope you're happy now. What may that signal be? Honk from the horn of the "short bus?"
dwight in philly Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 No, I got the point. The liberals are out of touch, as evidenced by a standard-def broadcast of an Olympic hockey game. Fox would have broadcast it in HD, no doubt. You're really not helping yourself, bonehead. i admit, i cannot keep up with you in the name calling dept, you win there!
Recommended Posts