The Big Cat Posted February 19, 2010 Author Posted February 19, 2010 How telling it is that you think a person who instinctively defends their family is weak. RIGHT, DEFENDED HER !@#$ING FAMILY BY BLOGGING. GIVE ME A !@#$ING BREAK WITH THIS ****.
Chef Jim Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 RIGHT, DEFENDED HER !@#$ING FAMILY BY BLOGGING. GIVE ME A !@#$ING BREAK WITH THIS ****. I'm not defending her for being weak. As a matter of fact I agree with you. The issue I have is that you don't think she has the right to feel or react any way she damn well pleases and it's none of your !@#$ing business. I think it took us 11 pages to realize something we knew from page one and that's the only reason YOU give a **** is because it Palin. What a fricken loser.
IDBillzFan Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 RIGHT, DEFENDED HER !@#$ING FAMILY BY BLOGGING. GIVE ME A !@#$ING BREAK WITH THIS ****. And POP! goes the weasel.
The Big Cat Posted February 19, 2010 Author Posted February 19, 2010 I'm not defending her for being weak. As a matter of fact I agree with you. The issue I have is that you don't think she has the right to feel or react any way she damn well pleases and it's none of your !@#$ing business. I think it took us 11 pages to realize something we knew from page one and that's the only reason YOU give a **** is because it Palin. What a fricken loser. It's because I'm so terribly frightened of her.
The Big Cat Posted February 19, 2010 Author Posted February 19, 2010 And POP! goes the weasel. Yep, turns out I caught a bit of your insanity watching you twist and shimmy around semantics just to save your pathetically loyal Republican face.
DC Tom Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 Have I said anything to indicate he doesn't? http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?...t&p=1760885
The Big Cat Posted February 19, 2010 Author Posted February 19, 2010 http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?...t&p=1760885 One has the right to be weak. One should not be weak. I don't know why this is so hard.
IDBillzFan Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 Yep, turns out I caught a bit of your insanity watching you twist and shimmy around semantics just to save your pathetically loyal Republican face. Gee, Cat, I'm not sure why you find this comment necessary. I was just pointing out how upset you were at people making fun of you. But, y'know, you're entitled to your weakness, I suppose.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 Gee, Cat, I'm not sure why you find this comment necessary. I was just pointing out how upset you were at people making fun of you. But, y'know, you're entitled to your weakness, I suppose. Epic sig, Mock.
The Big Cat Posted February 19, 2010 Author Posted February 19, 2010 Gee, Cat, I'm not sure why you find this comment necessary. I was just pointing out how upset you were at people making fun of you. But, y'know, you're entitled to your weakness, I suppose. Just where and when were you making fun of me? And under what pretext was it done in a comedic forum? Are you really so dim that you have to always resort to fabricating reality?
The Big Cat Posted February 19, 2010 Author Posted February 19, 2010 Why? She's not a comedian. She's not a comedy critic. And if she's going to create this tough-gal persona, she should start by not getting her panties in a wad because of cartoon.
Booster4324 Posted February 20, 2010 Posted February 20, 2010 Just where and when were you making fun of me? And under what pretext was it done in a comedic forum? Are you really so dim that you have to always resort to fabricating reality? The comedic forum was here, sorry you didn't appreciate the form of humor that was used, but they were making fun of you. You have shown yourself to have a relatively thin skin on several occasions, so this latest act rings terribly hollow.
The Big Cat Posted February 20, 2010 Author Posted February 20, 2010 The comedic forum was here, sorry you didn't appreciate the form of humor that was used, but they were making fun of you. You have shown yourself to have a relatively thin skin on several occasions, so this latest act rings terribly hollow. Are you suggesting this entire conversation has been a ruse? And that somehow, through my web-kenesis I was meant to interpret the debate as such?
Booster4324 Posted February 20, 2010 Posted February 20, 2010 Are you suggesting this entire conversation has been a ruse?And that somehow, through my web-kenesis I was meant to interpret the debate as such? Only if it is on your part. No, I meant that everyone has been making fun of you because you are coming across as an ass. I did not mean it is a big practical joke.
The Big Cat Posted February 20, 2010 Author Posted February 20, 2010 Only if it is on your part. No, I meant that everyone has been making fun of you because you are coming across as an ass. I did not mean it is a big practical joke. Not once have I felt personally attacked, or is this more from the damning thread which remains unfound?
IDBillzFan Posted February 20, 2010 Posted February 20, 2010 Only if it is on your part. No, I meant that everyone has been making fun of you because you are coming across as an ass. I did not mean it is a big practical joke. In the Big Cat alternate universe, he's the only one who makes sense in this thread, as is evidenced by the fact that BillsFan-4-Ever agrees with him. Which would be like thinking you're winning the global warming debate because conner backs your position.
The Big Cat Posted February 20, 2010 Author Posted February 20, 2010 In the Big Cat alternate universe, he's the only one who makes sense in this thread, as is evidenced by the fact that BillsFan-4-Ever agrees with him. Which would be like thinking you're winning the global warming debate because conner backs your position. Oh dear.
Booster4324 Posted February 20, 2010 Posted February 20, 2010 Not once have I felt personally attacked, or is this more from the damning thread which remains unfound? I am not going looking, just the impression I have of you from more than 1 thread. More to the point, you spazzed earlier with all CAPS. Hardly a cool cat move. It comes down to one simple fact, the public figure may be a target, their children aren't. The asshat has every right to say something about her child. You have the right to be on the side of the asshat. Everyone else has the right to ridicule as they want (uncool to make fun of others kids IMO trying to defend Palin's right to be upset).
The Big Cat Posted February 20, 2010 Author Posted February 20, 2010 I am not going looking, just the impression I have of you from more than 1 thread. More to the point, you spazzed earlier with all CAPS. Hardly a cool cat move. It comes down to one simple fact, the public figure may be a target, their children aren't. The asshat has every right to say something about her child. You have the right to be on the side of the asshat. Everyone else has the right to ridicule as they want (uncool to make fun of others kids IMO trying to defend Palin's right to be upset). Regardless of who said what, and more specifically to this case: doesn't parading your kids around for political benefit eliminate them from being protected by the right to privacy?
Recommended Posts