EndZoneCrew Posted February 16, 2010 Posted February 16, 2010 Uhhhhh, Bulger is only 32. http://www.nfl.com/players/marcbulger/profile?id=BUL162264 I'd rather have Kelly at 50 than Bulger at 32
VADC Bills Posted February 16, 2010 Posted February 16, 2010 Lets look at the resume - Has has taken the Rams from being the greatest show on earth to the sorry offensive team they are now. - He is a poor QB and anyone would be foolish to look at him as anything more than a back up. - Couldn't win with Bruce and Holt as receivers - No chance of leading a team to the Superbowl. - Has led the Rams to be the worst team in the league Git'er Done Buddy
SuperKillerRobots Posted February 16, 2010 Posted February 16, 2010 Actually, I would much prefer to see Garcia given a chance. He played well in all of his recent playing years. He's athletic, which, to me, indicates that he's the kind of older QB that could play at a high level for another year or two, on account of his mobility and athleticism. Anyway, I'd like to see him brought in as a mentor to a rookie this year, and let them compete in camp along with Brohm and maybe even Edwards (although with Edwards I'd be hesitant to see him play good in practice and then fold under pressure.) Everytime I think about Jeff Garcia and the Buffalo Bills, all that comes to mind is that last good defense we had and how it looked like at the time they ended his career. Garcia looked so out of place in that game and was brutalized. As far as Garcia-to-Buffalo goes, I'd rather have Pennington.
Thirty Year Fan Posted February 16, 2010 Posted February 16, 2010 Well, if the Rams go with Clausen or Bradford, Bulger may go elsewhere. Not that our line is any better than St. Lous but would Bulger want to sign here and would we want him. Here is the Link http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/...out-his-locker/ That rag doll is shot!
BillyBaroo Posted February 16, 2010 Posted February 16, 2010 Bulger is now gun shy and beat up. But buffalo could revive him. With what?! A terrible o-line? He would be revived because he would have to run faster?!
billsfan89 Posted February 17, 2010 Posted February 17, 2010 If Bulger gets cut I wouldn't mind bringing him in as a stop gap one year option. This is of course if we intend on drafting a LT with pick number 9. If we draft Buluga and our O-line improves with the return of Wood and Butler (And the obvious addition of Buluga) we might have a unit capable of growing into one that can protect a QB. But I think there are better stop gap options then Bulger like Kerry Collins.
bkc Posted February 17, 2010 Posted February 17, 2010 He might be better than the three guys we have. doesn't hurt to give him a look
Buffalonian-at-Heart Posted February 17, 2010 Posted February 17, 2010 If you are confident of Buffalo being able to revive such QBs, might as well try it on Trent Edwards. What would you revive in Edwards?
DPR4444 Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 http://content.usatoday.com/communities/th...zero-presence/1 "D'Marco Farr started on the defensive line for the St. Louis Rams' 1999 Super Bowl team, and now he's a radio analyst for the club, so he knows a thing or two about the inner workings of the franchise. And he said on NFL Network's NFL Total Access on Tuesday night that the Rams will have a new starting quarterback in 2010 because Marc Bulger lacked the chops to keep the job. Said Farr: "I think that ship has sailed. I think Marc Bulger has played his last snap for the St. Louis Rams, and I'm confident in saying that. Now there's a guy with all the talent in the world in my opinion. Has the same brain as Kurt Warner; they were trained under the same guy in Mike Martz. But absolutely no charisma. I mean the quarterback position is the guy everyone on the team wants to be. I don't think anyone wants to be Marc Bulger, so they're gonna need a new quarterback coming into 2010, either through free agency or through the draft." And Farr didn't stop there, adding: "It's a sad deal because the guy can wing the football. I mean the guy can flat play. But it's just -- he has aboslutely zero presence. Kyle Boller had a bigger presence than Marc Bulger did last season, and Kyle Boller is not half the player Marc Bulger is." Bulger remains under contract with the team while Boller is an unrestricted free agent. Farr believes the St. Louis natives want the team to draft Oklahoma QB Sam Bradford, but he thinks the Rams should take Nebraska DT Ndamukong Suh and find a quarterback in free agency. -- Nate Davis "
Deep2Moulds46 Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 If we're going to bring in a guy like Bulger, we might as well stick with Edwards.
Conch Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 Bulger witha good Oline is more serviceable than Fitz, TE of Brohm. He hasn't had an Oline in years. Pace was on the downside of a great career, Barron, never lived to expectations and is available. Get a good line and get one to two years out of Bulger and bring along Brohm or a QB in the draft.
PDaDdy Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 If you are confident of Buffalo being able to revive such QBs, might as well try it on Trent Edwards. How about we try it on a QB that has a big arm and has shown the balls to go deep in the past?
BUFFALOTONE Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 Bulger is now gun shy and beat up. But buffalo could revive him. and they will physically need to revive him after our turn style OL oles a DE.
BYGD1 Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 Well, if the Rams go with Clausen or Bradford, Bulger may go elsewhere. Not that our line is any better than St. Lous but would Bulger want to sign here and would we want him. Here is the Link http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/...out-his-locker/ What the hell with this stupid posts, The 3 QB's we have are better the Mark Bulger today
profile Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 When will the washed up loser QB threads stop? Seriously, if a guy hasn't won anything somewhere else, why would you want him here? Seriously?? How many people would pay money to see these guys play? here's the list of garbage QBs i have seen threads on here recently: Donovan McNabb Jeff Garcia Jason Campbell JP Losman (part 2) Micheal Vick Dante Culpepper Chad Pennington Charlie batch and a few others that escape me at the moment. Why on God's green earth would anyone want a guy who hasn't won anything other than some regular season games and a few (very few) playoff games to come here. And if you're thinking veteran leadership, forget it, these guys will only mentor mediocracy. Start new, with good solid coaching and a quality offensive scheme, surround said young QB with talent. forget the washed up bums, has beens, and never will-be's. I know the team hasn't won a playoff game since the music city mistake, but i have not sunk that low that i want to see some of this trash in a Bills uniform.
Bills!Win! Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 He's got about the same amount fire and passion as Jauron, IMO you need both your head coach and your QB to be the emotional leaders of your team. Bulger might be better than any QB on our roster but he's still just back up material if you ask me. Exhibit A: Rex Ryan and Sanchez
Conch Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 What the hell with this stupid posts, The 3 QB's we have are better the Mark Bulger today No they are not.
SawchukBills Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 No thank you! As unsure as people are about TE/RF/BB, Bulger would be worse. Say no to a 32 years and counting QB. I say stick with what we have or gamble on the draft. With Bulger you know what you're going to get.
Thirty Year Fan Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 Uhhhhh, Bulger is only 32. http://www.nfl.com/players/marcbulger/profile?id=BUL162264 He may be 32 but his body is 40 the way he has taken a beating the last 5 years.
Recommended Posts