Fezmid Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 I don't see why (unless part of some ridiculous, socialist idea to "share the wealth" with Canada) the US side of the Falls has to be so crappy Political corruption.
truth on hold Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 Roadways... I don't believe that could all possibly handle the volume whatsoever. Not a chance. Can you imagine Niagara Falls Blvd? With all the street lights... what a cluster**** that would be. Impossible. youre assuming everyone is coming from buffalo (ie south of the falls). plenty would come from canada (i.e. north) and rochester (northeast.) the falls area in general has capacity well beyond its current use due to population shrinkage. and you continue to act like getting in and out of the current stadium is some kind of 3 am drive on the thruway, when it most certainly isnt
beerme1 Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 A couple of things to mention having read this thread. 1. The guy who compared RWS to Lambeau, uh knock knock. Hello? They just spent a massive amount of money renovating it. They are far better off than we are with their old dump. 2. Hey dwight in philly, despite the stadium having been paid for, we do have psl's on all of our club seats here. I am not fond of the Ralph and nobodys doing anything more than we have to under the lease terms until Ralph goes away. Then if the team were to remain here (unlikely) I could see an infusion of 200 million and renovate the ralph being far more likely than building a new stadium and me, I would be more than alright with that.
PromoTheRobot Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 youre assuming everyone is coming from buffalo (ie south of the falls). plenty would come from canada (i.e. north) and rochester (northeast.) the falls area in general has capacity well beyond its current use due to population shrinkage. and you continue to act like getting in and out of the current stadium is some kind of 3 am drive on the thruway, when it most certainly isnt Agreed. Compare it to RWS. There are basically 6 roads in. Abbot north and south, Southwestern east and west, and Big Tree east and west. And guess what, Chalkie...they all have STOP LIGHTS! To say it would be any worse to drive to the Falls for a game is ludicrous. PTR
Hammered a Lot Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 The Spanos's are going to put up all of the money. The city just has to donate the land, which they would like to do, but the land was/is a city bus depot and the soil is contaminated. They are arguing who has to pay for the soil cleanup. It is sad about selling the horses. As far as the horses go, I think the savings were more like 2 million though. It was either get rid of the horses and transfer those officers to squad cars or fire them. The horses lost. To close a $179 million budget gap San Diego will save $243,000 a year by dumping the horses and 9 dogs.
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 youre assuming everyone is coming from buffalo (ie south of the falls). plenty would come from canada (i.e. north) and rochester (northeast.) the falls area in general has capacity well beyond its current use due to population shrinkage. and you continue to act like getting in and out of the current stadium is some kind of 3 am drive on the thruway, when it most certainly isnt So you're assuming that people from Rochester are going to drive country roads westward? They're all coming down the 90 still, and they'll be merging onto the 290. And they will be using all the roads (Niagara Falls Blvd., River Rd. and the Grand Island bridges) that everyone from Tonawanda south (which is the vast majority) will be using. Now, perhaps they will have the traffic run with the police conducting it. Will still need more than two lanes heading towards Niagara Falls. You also have to account for the large amount of Tonawanda/Amherst traffic (local), which is way more than the amount that's dealt with when considering Orchard Park.
PromoTheRobot Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 A couple of things to mention having read this thread. 1. The guy who compared RWS to Lambeau, uh knock knock. Hello? They just spent a massive amount of money renovating it. They are far better off than we are with their old dump. 2. Hey dwight in philly, despite the stadium having been paid for, we do have psl's on all of our club seats here. I am not fond of the Ralph and nobodys doing anything more than we have to under the lease terms until Ralph goes away. Then if the team were to remain here (unlikely) I could see an infusion of 200 million and renovate the ralph being far more likely than building a new stadium and me, I would be more than alright with that. This reminds me of Baltimore when they were trying to build the baseball stadium at Camden Yards. They used to play at Memorial Stadium, located in a residential neighborhood, and with so little parking cars had to be parked door-to-door and end-to-end!! (I couldn't believe it either.) Still, if you asked any Orioles fan if they needed a new stadium, they would have all said "NO!" Memorial was perfect as it was. Slap a coat of paint on it maybe, nothing more. There was a columnist...his name escapes me but he would be like Larry Felser, the grand old man of the paper...who railed daily against the travesty of replacing a stadium with the character that Memorial had. If you ever been to Memorial Stadium, it had all the character of a parking garage! Cold, leaky, exposed pipes and unadorned cement walls. Still fans loved the place. Of course they did build Camden Yards and, as if by magic, the same people who loved Memorial forgot all about that dump and beamed with pride over their new showplace. Something tells me the same would happen with RWS. PTR
PromoTheRobot Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 So you're assuming that people from Rochester are going to drive country roads westward? They're all coming down the 90 still, and they'll be merging onto the 290. And they will be using all the roads (Niagara Falls Blvd., River Rd. and the Grand Island bridges) that everyone from Tonawanda south (which is the vast majority) will be using. Now, perhaps they will have the traffic run with the police conducting it. Will still need more than two lanes heading towards Niagara Falls. You also have to account for the large amount of Tonawanda/Amherst traffic (local), which is way more than the amount that's dealt with when considering Orchard Park. Chalk, everything you say about driving to the Falls already happens every game day at Orchard Park, and yet the games still get played at the sun still rises. Stop exaggerating already. Unless you can cite some traffic study then it's all opinion. PTR
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 Agreed. Compare it to RWS. There are basically 6 roads in. Abbot north and south, Southwestern east and west, and Big Tree east and west. And guess what, Chalkie...they all have STOP LIGHTS! To say it would be any worse to drive to the Falls for a game is ludicrous. PTR Yes, Niagara Falls Blvd. has a zillion street lights, you are correct. Once you get off the 290, you're bombarded with them for quite some time. You get off the 219 at the Milestrip exit, you encounter a couple of them, then you turn left on Abbott and you're within site of the stadium. Same with Big Tree... you exit from the 219, you encounter one street light at California Rd. and then head to stadium parking lot. I don't think you're even wanting to acknowledge the kind of complete cluster**** that would envelope Niagara Falls Blvd. from the 290... how far back do you want the traffic on the 290 to pull over to the shoulder, if they weren't going to build a new lane on the right hand side (approaching from the direction of the airport)? Even if they build a new lane, that wouldn't alleviate the problem completely. How much of Grand Island gets backed up? The bridges themselves? Sounds like a recipe for disaster... considering it's the Buffalo area, that's probably why it would be considered.
PromoTheRobot Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 Yes, Niagara Falls Blvd. has a zillion street lights, you are correct. Once you get off the 290, you're bombarded with them for quite some time. You get off the 219 at the Milestrip exit, you encounter a couple of them, then you turn left on Abbott and you're within site of the stadium. Same with Big Tree... you exit from the 219, you encounter one street light at California Rd. and then head to stadium parking lot. I don't think you're even wanting to acknowledge the kind of complete cluster**** that would envelope Niagara Falls Blvd. from the 290... how far back do you want the traffic on the 290 to pull over to the shoulder, if they weren't going to build a new lane on the right hand side (approaching from the direction of the airport)? Even if they build a new lane, that wouldn't alleviate the problem completely. How much of Grand Island gets backed up? The bridges themselves? Sounds like a recipe for disaster... considering it's the Buffalo area, that's probably why it would be considered. I think you are exaggerating. There are half a dozen ways to get to the Falls. This traffic nightmare you predict would never happen, certainly not 15 miles away like you suggest. PTR
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 The 290 and the Grand Island bridges aren't 15 miles away from Niagara Falls. Show me the half dozen... I saw three approaches to the Falls... Grand Island bridges, Niagara Falls Blvd. and River Rd. (I'm assuming River Rd. would be viable).
truth on hold Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 The 290 and the Grand Island bridges aren't 15 miles away from Niagara Falls. Show me the half dozen... I saw three approaches to the Falls... Grand Island bridges, Niagara Falls Blvd. and River Rd. (I'm assuming River Rd. would be viable). yet again, chawkie refuses to compare it to the continued mess which is getting in and out of the ralph and continues to not acknowledge that a lot of fans WOULDNT be coming from Buffalo under the new plan
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 yet again, chawkie refuses to compare it to the continued mess which is getting in and out of the ralph and continues to not acknowledge that a lot of fans WOULDNT be coming from Buffalo under the new plan Are they coming from outer space? Is there a huge cult in Medina? If you have a problem getting in and out of Ralph Wiggam Stadium, you should probably just hand in your license. Ok, Niagara Falls is a ******* dump. You may as well put an NFL stadium in Gary, Indiana. Why in the hell would you put a stadium in Niagara County? Why are you insistent on kissing Kanada's ass??? And provide some actual, viable reasons as to why a stadium should go to Niagara Falls, NY, a glistening cesspool of toxic waste. Is it for your Kanadian friends? Is it because Jim Kelly may have uttered it once? You want to put a stadium in one of the ugliest, most downtrodden ****holes in this entire country. Fantastic. I will try and convince Jeff Lurie that he should build a new stadium across the Delaware and slap it down right in the middle of Camden, NJ. Seriously, a stadium isn't going to be built in either Erie or Niagara Co.
Just Jack Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 Ask Patriot* fans how much fun it is trying to get out of Foxboro after a game. RWS is nothing compared to there.
wide_right Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 Are they coming from outer space? Is there a huge cult in Medina? If you have a problem getting in and out of Ralph Wiggam Stadium, you should probably just hand in your license. Ok, Niagara Falls is a ******* dump. You may as well put an NFL stadium in Gary, Indiana. Why in the hell would you put a stadium in Niagara County? Why are you insistent on kissing Kanada's ass??? Within walking distance of one the world's natural wonders and a major tourist attraction. WOW
Russ 'Em Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 Anyone who thinks that the NFL would bring the SuperBowl to blustery Western New York in February is mad. Why so people can sip cocktails on the beach while prancing around in there bathing suits. Or maybe they can take in some of our world class restaurants and clubs. Give me a break. Let the world come here and huddle in there hotel rooms or spend all there money at the indian run casinos. Fantastic idea. We might as well just rent a whole **** load of buses and send them to Toronto for the week. They can come back on Sunday and watch the game.
dwight in philly Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 Ask Patriot* fans how much fun it is trying to get out of Foxboro after a game. RWS is nothing compared to there. i think the ralph clears out well, considering the amount of people consistently attending. i think the tailgating helps a great deal, both before and after games. i cannot imagine those snooty pat's fans, liberal new englander's , knowing how to tailgate. i am sure they are more concerned about the "dangers" of charcoal, than actually enjoying life!
KD in CA Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 Ask Patriot* fans how much fun it is trying to get out of Foxboro after a game. RWS is nothing compared to there. At least it's not like the old days when the crowds would all walk across Route 1, blocking the cars trying to exit the lot.
wide_right Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 Anyone who thinks that the NFL would bring the SuperBowl to blustery Western New York in February is mad. Why so people can sip cocktails on the beach while prancing around in there bathing suits. Or maybe they can take in some of our world class restaurants and clubs. Give me a break. Let the world come here and huddle in there hotel rooms or spend all there money at the indian run casinos. Fantastic idea. We might as well just rent a whole **** load of buses and send them to Toronto for the week. They can come back on Sunday and watch the game. Winter is a great time to view the ice covered falls. Gambling would be right next to the stadium. The Canadian side has been built up that its shows, shopping and sites rival anything out there. And oh yeah, The Canadian Ballet! Theyve had Super Bowls in Detroit and Minnesota ... just as cold but no where near the attractions. Super Bowl by the Falls would be amazing.
truth on hold Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 Winter is a great time to view the ice covered falls. Gambling would be right next to the stadium. The Canadian side has been built up that its shows, shopping and sites rival anything out there. And oh yeah, The Canadian Ballet! Theyve had Super Bowls in Detroit and Minnesota ... just as cold but no where near the attractions. Super Bowl by the Falls would be amazing. I went to Bills -Skins in Minnesota. Had a great time. A lot more fun than the Bills - Boys I went to in Pasadena.
Recommended Posts