Andrew in CA Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 That's up to you. I hope that she doesn't win the primaries, but if it comes down to it, I'll take just about any fiscally conservative administration over the present one, and just going by the limited experience out of both of them that I have seen, she's had more tangible success in governing than BO. And it's not even close. I'm curious- do you never vote 3rd party, then? I know you advocate voting best candidate regardless of party, but this indicates that you'll vote Republican in the next election no matter what. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 I'm curious- do you never vote 3rd party, then? I know you advocate voting best candidate regardless of party, but this indicates that you'll vote Republican in the next election no matter what. I don't know how you came to that conclusion, unless you are saying that you believe that the GOP is the only party that represents Fiscal restraint, what I said was that I would vote for whoever I believed could produce the most fiscally conservative administration. If that person is an independent, and he best represents my fiscal values, then yes I would vote for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew in CA Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 She is not what the GOP needs, don't get me wrong, if she wins the primary, which I hope to god she doesn't, then I'll vote for her. Anything that resembles a coherent conservatively fiscal plan will gain my vote over the disastrous Obama agenda. Sorry, here's where I got that, not the portion I quoted. "If that person is an independent, and he best represents my fiscal values, then yes I would vote for him." Then why would you vote for Palin just because she won the GOP primary, hypothetically? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 Sorry, here's where I got that, not the portion I quoted. I am not endorsing her, as I've stated a few times in this thread alone, and I believe she is the worst possible GOP candidate that they could possibly muster, not so much because I believe that she isn't capable, but because of her divisive nature that could rile up the Liberal looney base and turn off the Independent voters. If it came down to it, would I rather have her agenda or Obama's, I wouldn't hesitate for a second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew in CA Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 I am not endorsing her, as I've stated a few times in this thread alone, and I believe she is the worst possible GOP candidate that they could possibly muster, not so much because I believe that she isn't capable, but because of her divisive nature that could rile up the Liberal looney base and turn off the Independent voters. If it came down to it, would I rather have her agenda or Obama's, I wouldn't hesitate for a second. So why note vote 3rd party if it comes down to it in the next election? Why vote for her just because she wins the GOP primary, if you think she's a bad candidate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted February 10, 2010 Author Share Posted February 10, 2010 I am not endorsing her, as I've stated a few times in this thread alone, and I believe she is the worst possible GOP candidate that they could possibly muster, not so much because I believe that she isn't capable, but because of her divisive nature that could rile up the Liberal looney base and turn off the Independent voters. If it came down to it, would I rather have her agenda or Obama's, I wouldn't hesitate for a second. I'd like to know what her agenda is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 So why note vote 3rd party if it comes down to it in the next election? Why vote for her just because she wins the GOP primary, if you think she's a bad candidate? Because he's a repetitive little cheerleader who would willingly vote to have a functional retard leading our nation as long as it was a functional retard from his favorite team? Just a wild guess......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 Because he's a repetitive little cheerleader who would willingly vote to have a functional retard leading our nation as long as it was a functional retard from his favorite team?Just a wild guess......... Who, pBills? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjamie12 Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 Because he's a repetitive little cheerleader who would willingly vote to have a functional retard leading our nation as long as it was a functional retard from his favorite team?Just a wild guess......... I don't presume to speak for Magox... (but I'll do it anyway) I think he just mis-spoke upthread. He doesn't strike me as a 'Republican'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 Who, pBills? They are mirror images of one another. I don't presume to speak for Magox... (but I'll do it anyway) I think he just mis-spoke upthread. He doesn't strike me as a 'Republican'. In the thousands of posts he's placed on this board, I don't think I've seen one that isn't either attacking "liberals" or propping up the dogma of his political masters. He's every bit as preprogrammed as conner, Wacka, Bishop Hedd and the many other indoctrinated echo chambers we try to ignore on a daily basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 Because he's a repetitive little cheerleader who would willingly vote to have a functional retard leading our nation as long as it was a functional retard from his favorite team?Just a wild guess......... Oh look what crawled out of the toilet, I thought I smelled something, now go back to the sewer little drummer boy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 So why note vote 3rd party if it comes down to it in the next election? Why vote for her just because she wins the GOP primary, if you think she's a bad candidate? I will if there is a viable candidate that best represents my fiscal values. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted February 10, 2010 Share Posted February 10, 2010 Teleprompter, 2x4 cards....there really isn't much difference. We are just told by the biased media that we should criticize for this and we foolishly listen, just as we do with everything else. America- home of the Automaton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew in CA Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I will if there is a viable candidate that best represents my fiscal values. I believe you- in fact, I brought it up because it seemed out of character for you. You do constantly bash liberals, no doubt, but I didn't have you pegged for a Republican lap dog like Wacka. Not that you care, I'm sure, but I was curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Where the hell did the idea that I am a GOP "lap dog" come up? I thought Bush was too liberal on domestic issues. I didn't like Mc Cain, loved Palin but they were light years better than what we have now. I haven't been posting much recently, been busy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Where the hell did the idea that I am a GOP "lap dog" come up? I thought Bush was too liberal on domestic issues. I didn't like Mc Cain, loved Palin but they were light years better than what we have now. I haven't been posting much recently, been busy. I also never pegged Wacka as a GOP lap dog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I also never pegged Wacka as a GOP lap dog. You're loco. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted February 11, 2010 Author Share Posted February 11, 2010 Who, pBills? Wow, even after 16,000 posts you still add nothing. Keep up the good work. Your parents must be so proud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Wow, even after 16,000 posts you still add nothing. Keep up the good work. Your parents must be so proud. Sincerely, Irony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 You're loco. Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts