Senator Offers Bill to End Earmarks, Balance Budget

[Adam]

In fact, I would support a concentration camp for the total extermination of anyone and everyone still defending W while claiming something other than total hatred of the US. Anyone and everyone still supporting W hates the US completely, because nobody in our history ever did more harm to the US than W, and that is what such traitors celebrate when they defend W.

hmmm hmmm hmmm hmmm hmmmm hmmmm hmmm

[LaDairis]

hmmm hmmm hmmm hmmm hmmmm hmmmm hmmm

 

 

 

Notice that nobody has attempted a serious defense of W, nobody claims Northern Alliance was not funded and armed by Iran (which it was), nobody is claiming that Iran under Rafsanjani wasn't helping us in Afghan before W flipped them off (because they were), nobody is claiming W didn't pork out and spend like a drunk sailor, complete with lying to socialize senior drugs, because he did.

 

Nobody is claiming W didn't send way too few to Afghan for "not a priority" Osama Bin Laden, because the initial W deployment to Afghan was 12k or barely enough to take and hold Kabul and Khandahar.

 

When Cheney went on Meet the Press and told us "we know Iraq is training Al Qaeda in chem weapons," nobody in our "US media" bothered to point out the following:

 

1. Osama lives "the Islamic Lifestyle," and the AQ manual states that "Islamic" leaders who don't live the lifestyle should be "overthrown." Saddam drank and smoked. If Saddam smoked in front of Osama, Osama would hack off his fingers. Osama and Saddam wanted each other DEAD. If Al Qaeda had existed in Iraq, they would have done the world a favor by offing Saddam and his kids, and Saddam knew that.

2. Chem is not a good weapon for Al Qaeda, which is why they don't use it. In fact, chem isn't a good weapon at all, which is why Saddam stopped his program before the Gulf War. Chem requires those expensive suits, expensive storage facilities (and air superiority, less those facilities get hit), is big and bulky, and only useful when your enemy is pinned in a valley (which is exactly the two situations Saddam used it) because the gas "sinks."

 

 

Cheney and Zionist Traitor George Tenet broke our laws and treaties to "waterboard" one Gitmo, not even an AQ, to say "Saddam is training AQ in chem."

 

THAT was Cheney's "evidence."

 

 

TREASON...

[Adam]

Notice that nobody has attempted a serious defense of W, nobody claims Northern Alliance was not funded and armed by Iran (which it was), nobody is claiming that Iran under Rafsanjani wasn't helping us in Afghan before W flipped them off (because they were), nobody is claiming W didn't pork out and spend like a drunk sailor, complete with lying to socialize senior drugs, because he did.

 

Nobody is claiming W didn't send way too few to Afghan for "not a priority" Osama Bin Laden, because the initial W deployment to Afghan was 12k or barely enough to take and hold Kabul and Khandahar.

 

When Cheney went on Meet the Press and told us "we know Iraq is training Al Qaeda in chem weapons," nobody in our "US media" bothered to point out the following:

 

1. Osama lives "the Islamic Lifestyle," and the AQ manual states that "Islamic" leaders who don't live the lifestyle should be "overthrown." Saddam drank and smoked. If Saddam smoked in front of Osama, Osama would hack off his fingers. Osama and Saddam wanted each other DEAD. If Al Qaeda had existed in Iraq, they would have done the world a favor by offing Saddam and his kids, and Saddam knew that.

2. Chem is not a good weapon for Al Qaeda, which is why they don't use it. In fact, chem isn't a good weapon at all, which is why Saddam stopped his program before the Gulf War. Chem requires those expensive suits, expensive storage facilities (and air superiority, less those facilities get hit), is big and bulky, and only useful when your enemy is pinned in a valley (which is exactly the two situations Saddam used it) because the gas "sinks."

 

 

Cheney and Zionist Traitor George Tenet broke our laws and treaties to "waterboard" one Gitmo, not even an AQ, to say "Saddam is training AQ in chem."

 

THAT was Cheney's "evidence."

 

 

TREASON...

You told people they should be burned alive for having an opinion. There are plenty of people like that in history.

 

Again....

 

hmmm hmmm hmmm hmmm hmmmm hmmmm hmmm

[Alaska Darin]

This from a self-proclaimed "science expert" who assured us that Al Gore is 100% right about "Global" "warming."

No, he didn't. Not that your credibility matters or anything. Ladumbass is in the hizzle.

[Alaska Darin]

Perhaps I would have been "somebody" two years ago had W not purged 7 Federal prosecutors for failing to follow W's doctrine that Madoff, the Rabbis in NJ selling Palestinian body parts, and the rest of the Zionists in the US were above the law.

Sure. There are a whole bunch of somebodies running around the internet advocating concentration camps and burning people who disagree with them.

Hint: Madoff's indictment was Dec 12, 2008, or about three weeks into the DOJ transition. The only thing that kept Madoff from being indicted 2001-2008 was W and his non-stop appeasement of Zionists who hated his daddy.

So?

[DC Tom]

This from a self-proclaimed "science expert" who assured us that Al Gore is 100% right about "Global" "warming."

 

 

Where do you get that from? You're managing to out-stupid conner now - and that's no mean feat.

[DC Tom]

The documentation of treason against the US is only funny to those who hate the US, like those pushing The FRAUD of Global non-Warming.

 

And there's "fraud" in caps.

[keepthefaith]

Notice that nobody has attempted a serious defense of W, nobody claims Northern Alliance was not funded and armed by Iran (which it was), nobody is claiming that Iran under Rafsanjani wasn't helping us in Afghan before W flipped them off (because they were), nobody is claiming W didn't pork out and spend like a drunk sailor, complete with lying to socialize senior drugs, because he did.

 

Nobody is claiming W didn't send way too few to Afghan for "not a priority" Osama Bin Laden, because the initial W deployment to Afghan was 12k or barely enough to take and hold Kabul and Khandahar.

 

When Cheney went on Meet the Press and told us "we know Iraq is training Al Qaeda in chem weapons," nobody in our "US media" bothered to point out the following:

 

1. Osama lives "the Islamic Lifestyle," and the AQ manual states that "Islamic" leaders who don't live the lifestyle should be "overthrown." Saddam drank and smoked. If Saddam smoked in front of Osama, Osama would hack off his fingers. Osama and Saddam wanted each other DEAD. If Al Qaeda had existed in Iraq, they would have done the world a favor by offing Saddam and his kids, and Saddam knew that.

2. Chem is not a good weapon for Al Qaeda, which is why they don't use it. In fact, chem isn't a good weapon at all, which is why Saddam stopped his program before the Gulf War. Chem requires those expensive suits, expensive storage facilities (and air superiority, less those facilities get hit), is big and bulky, and only useful when your enemy is pinned in a valley (which is exactly the two situations Saddam used it) because the gas "sinks."

 

 

Cheney and Zionist Traitor George Tenet broke our laws and treaties to "waterboard" one Gitmo, not even an AQ, to say "Saddam is training AQ in chem."

 

THAT was Cheney's "evidence."

 

 

TREASON...

 

You're not going to get much support for Bush here or anywhere. Old news. What's the point? This thread is about a balanced budget bill. Common sense. I'm sure you support it.

[Jim in Anchorage]

This is a absolutely epic. He has gone from calling Sage "a a traitor who should be burned alive" for supporting the "lies" that justified a war that started when he was what, sixteen? all the way to apparently endorsing Dracula. And to think I almost missed it. Do NOT ban him.

[bills_fan]

Yeah, AD sorry about your thread being shot (I really do love the ideas DeMint is proposing), but LaDarius melting down is pretty comical.

[Alaska Darin]

Yeah, AD sorry about your thread being shot (I really do love the ideas DeMint is proposing), but LaDarius melting down is pretty comical.

The funniest thing is it's not really a meltdown. He's that big a tool.

[IDBillzFan]

The funniest thing is it's not really a meltdown. He's that big a tool.

I'm reminded of an insult I read at some blog recently where a guy posted some nonsense about global warming and a poster commented that "It's obvious the smartest part of you dripped down your mother's leg."

[Nanker]

He seems to be a hybrid Lyndon LaRouche / John Birch Society ideologue - with a 'tude.

[EC-Bills]

I've discussed DeMint before, and I truly like him. His book, "Saving Freedom," was very interesting to me as he documented his wide-eyed naivete going into public office, mistakes he made, and the art of pitting groups against each other, etc. He is the closet thing to a true conservative that I have found, and would love to see him make a run.

 

It's nice to see that someone in office is actually refelctive and tries to learn from it. The only time any reflection is done by a politician in my state (IL) is trying to figure out where they screwed up which led to them getting caught.

 

Unfortunately, he is strict to his Christian beliefs, and America seems to hate Christians these days.

 

For me, that would be a deal breaker. I do not hate Christians. I feel people are free to believe whatever they want to believe. The issue I have with social conservatives (whom I differentiate from regular Christians, whom in my experiences, are open/tolerant of other view points) is the need to use religion as a means to butt into the lives of people they do not agree with. I grew up in the bible belt so I had my fill of this stuff and then some.

 

I find it ironic he talks about on his website upholding the Constitution, the freedoms it provides, and yet turns around and wants to deny people basic freedoms by ammending the Constitution declaring marriage shall only consist of a legal union between a man and a woman.

 

All of which frustrates me as I agree with him on a lot of other issues. Ideally I would like to find someone running for office that is a fiscal conservative, smaller govt, etc. and most importantly actually understands and respects the Constitution.

[LaDairis]

This is a absolutely epic. He has gone from calling Sage "a a traitor who should be burned alive" for supporting the "lies" that justified a war that started when he was what, sixteen? all the way to apparently endorsing Dracula. And to think I almost missed it. Do NOT ban him.

 

 

 

You seem to think that lies used to get US troops killed for nothing in US national interest are just fine.

 

 

This is because you don't care one bit about the United States. Rather, you care about Israel, and your contempt for the US and the fate of those in the US military is only matched by your Zionist heroes at FIXED, who still insist Saddam and Osama were pals.

 

 

If someone lies and gets US troops killed for nothing in US national interest, I think that someone is a traitor who should be executed. You disagree. You love that individual. You worship him. You don't want him executed. You want him worshipped...

[LaDairis]

No, he didn't. Not that your credibility matters or anything. Ladumbass is in the hizzle.

 

 

 

It is fascinating to watch all of the Wall's resident Zionists act like levites and all lie at once.

 

 

Perhaps you will now tell us that Dr. Michael Mann is really a christian and not an Israelite Zionist Traitor too??

 

 

The thing Judaism hates the most = TRUTH... and those who publicize it over Zionist media lies...

[Alaska Darin]

It is fascinating to watch all of the Wall's resident Zionists act like levites and all lie at once.

 

 

Perhaps you will now tell us that Dr. Michael Mann is really a christian and not an Israelite Zionist Traitor too??

 

 

The thing Judaism hates the most = TRUTH... and those who publicize it over Zionist media lies...

And now you get to do it without commenting.

[IDBillzFan]

It's nice to see that someone in office is actually refelctive and tries to learn from it. The only time any reflection is done by a politician in my state (IL) is trying to figure out where they screwed up which led to them getting caught.

 

 

 

For me, that would be a deal breaker. I do not hate Christians. I feel people are free to believe whatever they want to believe. The issue I have with social conservatives (whom I differentiate from regular Christians, whom in my experiences, are open/tolerant of other view points) is the need to use religion as a means to butt into the lives of people they do not agree with. I grew up in the bible belt so I had my fill of this stuff and then some.

 

I find it ironic he talks about on his website upholding the Constitution, the freedoms it provides, and yet turns around and wants to deny people basic freedoms by ammending the Constitution declaring marriage shall only consist of a legal union between a man and a woman.

 

All of which frustrates me as I agree with him on a lot of other issues. Ideally I would like to find someone running for office that is a fiscal conservative, smaller govt, etc. and most importantly actually understands and respects the Constitution.

His social beliefs don't bother me that much because in this manner, the only difference between DeMint and Obama is DeMint is more open about it. For example, Obama doesn't belief gays should be allowed to marry. And based on an article I read this morning here, he really doesn't care about "don't ask, don't tell" beyond pandering to his base. So if both sides have the same belief on key social issues, I'll take the guy who at least believes in a balanced budget, fiscal restraint and an end to earmarks. Still, being vocal about his Christian beliefs will get him hammered by the left. That's the ad

 

Reports on the meat of the new "Jobs Bill" are coming out, and if they are to be believed, DeMint's efforts could get more airtime because it looks to be another bloated bill that does little to address jobs and does more to hand out cash to friends.

[John Adams]

You have chosen to ignore all posts from: LaDairis.

 

· View this post

· Un-ignore LaDairis

[John Adams]

And now you get to do it without commenting.

 

Ah, so you're another tool of the Zionist plot.