Alaska Darin Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 South Carolina Senator Offers Real "Change". The President campaigned on ending earmarks, then promptly signed a bill with over 9000 of them. I wonder how may co-sponsors this bill will end up with. I don't wonder if it will pass because the "fiscally conscious" legislators in both the Republican and Democratic parties would NEVER allow it.
Magox Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 South Carolina Senator Offers Real "Change". The President campaigned on ending earmarks, then promptly signed a bill with over 9000 of them. I wonder how may co-sponsors this bill will end up with. I don't wonder if it will pass because the "fiscally conscious" legislators in both the Republican and Democratic parties would NEVER allow it. Too bad it will never pass.
IDBillzFan Posted February 4, 2010 Posted February 4, 2010 I've discussed DeMint before, and I truly like him. His book, "Saving Freedom," was very interesting to me as he documented his wide-eyed naivete going into public office, mistakes he made, and the art of pitting groups against each other, etc. He is the closet thing to a true conservative that I have found, and would love to see him make a run. Unfortunately, he is strict to his Christian beliefs, and America seems to hate Christians these days. His book wasn't exactly a barn-burner, but he really gave an interesting look at how things work in DC (like putting an increase for troop funding in a bill to permit, say, child porn in all libraries, and when Republicans vote against it, the Democrats run around yelling that the GOP hates the military). Probably the equivalent of Highlights magazine to some of you, but I found it pretty interesting.
keepthefaith Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 I've discussed DeMint before, and I truly like him. His book, "Saving Freedom," was very interesting to me as he documented his wide-eyed naivete going into public office, mistakes he made, and the art of pitting groups against each other, etc. He is the closet thing to a true conservative that I have found, and would love to see him make a run. Unfortunately, he is strict to his Christian beliefs, and America seems to hate Christians these days. His book wasn't exactly a barn-burner, but he really gave an interesting look at how things work in DC (like putting an increase for troop funding in a bill to permit, say, child porn in all libraries, and when Republicans vote against it, the Democrats run around yelling that the GOP hates the military). Probably the equivalent of Highlights magazine to some of you, but I found it pretty interesting. Really like DeMint. It's be interesting to see how far this bill goes. If it gets Republican support but not from Dems, it'll be a great campaign piece for Republicans come November. We've reached a time where spending has to be dramatically cut. The numbers are so far out of whack and we simply can't afford the path we're on. I expect some Dems to begin talking the cuts agenda this fall. I really do.
Gary M Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 Too bad it will never pass. because it isn't bipartisan.......... enough!!!
LaDairis Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 "Unfortunately, he is strict to his Christian beliefs, and America seems to hate Christians these days." No, Americans just hate pseudo "Christian" traitors like W who dedicate their public lives to selling out our troops to raise cash and get favorable media coverage from the Zionist lobby. The US, under mostly GOP rule (in the House especially), prospered under the fiscal conservatism of Newt Gingrich, with a booming economy and a SURPLUS in the 1990s thanks to SIX STRAIGHT YEARS of NO FEDERAL SPENDING INCREASES. Then the pseudo THUMPERS couped Newt and the pork fest was on, led by Tom Delay, Frist, Fat Hastert, and the rest of the pseudo Christian traitors. Ten years later, the difference between what the US Federal government spent in 1998 and what it spent in 2008 was more than the 1.4 trillion deficit W's big spending Bible Thumping Socialist porkfest left us. Then there is the problem of the bigoted invalid traitors who call themselves "conservative Christians" supporting selling out our troops over intentional lies and precisely nothing in our national interest in Iraq while making those who hit us on 911 "not a priority," all to appease the pro gay, pro abortion, pro socialism Zionist lobby, which was cheering on 911 for Al Qaeda and Taliban in their ongoing war at the time with Iranian backed and funded Northern Alliance in Afghan, because Israel hates Iran. Iran, the enemy of our enemy on 911, was offering to help us off AQ under then Prez Rafsanjani, an Ahmadinejad opponent. When W flipped off Iran with "Axis of Evil," he flipped off our allies in Afghan, and he put Ahmadinejad in power in Iran. A Prez deploys troops to area A to fight with ally B against enemy C, and then the Prez, with our troops still there, intentionally flips off ally B = THAT is what W did in Afghan to appease the Zionist Lobby = TREASON. But W wasn't through selling out the US to Israel. Israel wanted the US to invade and occupy Iraq, which is why the same Zionist lobby hated Bush 41 so much, and W wanted money and favorable media coverage. Lie after lie after intentional lie was used to justify Iraq. Then W sold out The FED The TREASURY The DOJ The CIA also to the Zionist Lobby by installing 100% career pro gay pro abortion Dem Zionists to each. Finally, when the US economy collapsed because of the Bible Thumping Socialist PORKFEST 98-08, W took our money and handed it once again to Zionists on Wall Street. I have no problem with authentic Christians. I have a big problem with traitors, liars, big spending "Republican" sellouts, and those who think the US exists to serve Israel (as long as they get money and favorable media coverage to sell the US out to Israel). In fact, I would support a concentration camp for the total extermination of anyone and everyone still defending W while claiming something other than total hatred of the US. Anyone and everyone still supporting W hates the US completely, because nobody in our history ever did more harm to the US than W, and that is what such traitors celebrate when they defend W.
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 In fact, I would support a concentration camp for the total extermination of anyone and everyone still defending W while claiming something other than total hatred of the US. Anyone and everyone still supporting W hates the US completely, because nobody in our history ever did more harm to the US than W, and that is what such traitors celebrate when they defend W. He should be kicked off of TSW for this. If he isn't, these boards aren't being run correctly. JMO
LaDairis Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 He should be kicked off of TSW for this. If he isn't, these boards aren't being run correctly. JMO And there you have it. No rights for Americans at all. No free speech. No telling the truth. Just send our troops to fight and die for a Greater Israel and then shovel our money into Zionist pocked on Wall Street after porking out for a decade. This above traitor supported 1. W's massive porkfest, completely with lying to Congress about the cost of Socializing senior drugs 2. intentional lies to dump our troops in Iraq for nothing in US national interest 3. making those who hit us on 911 "not a priority" Yes, indeed, traitor, you deserve to be burned alive in public.
DC Tom Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 He should be kicked off of TSW for this. If he isn't, these boards aren't being run correctly. JMO Why? He's entitled to an opinion, and entitled to express it, and entitled to prove he's an idiot. Banning him would just be protecting him from himself.
DC Tom Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 Then there is the problem of the bigoted invalid traitors who call themselves "conservative Christians" supporting selling out our troops over intentional lies and precisely nothing in our national interest in Iraq while making those who hit us on 911 "not a priority," all to appease the pro gay, pro abortion, pro socialism Zionist lobby, which was cheering on 911 for Al Qaeda and Taliban in their ongoing war at the time with Iranian backed and funded Northern Alliance in Afghan, because Israel hates Iran. Iran, the enemy of our enemy on 911, was offering to help us off AQ under then Prez Rafsanjani, an Ahmadinejad opponent. This **** is just comedy gold. All it's missing is "fraud" in capital letters.
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 And there you have it. No rights for Americans at all. No free speech. No telling the truth. Just send our troops to fight and die for a Greater Israel and then shovel our money into Zionist pocked on Wall Street after porking out for a decade. This above traitor supported 1. W's massive porkfest, completely with lying to Congress about the cost of Socializing senior drugs 2. intentional lies to dump our troops in Iraq for nothing in US national interest 3. making those who hit us on 911 "not a priority" Yes, indeed, traitor, you deserve to be burned alive in public. You have your free speech, and so do I, and so do the moderators of this website. I'm using my free speech to call you a disgusting human being. I'm sure the moderators will exercise their free speech to ban you. See? Nobody's free speech is being infringed upon.
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 Why? He's entitled to an opinion, and entitled to express it, and entitled to prove he's an idiot. Banning him would just be protecting him from himself. You don't think he's crossing a line by saying all W supporters (as deluded as they may have been) should be slaughtered in concentration camps? Oh, then he tells me I should be burned in public. I realize there's a lot of vitriol on this particular board, but legitimate hate speech like that should warrant a ban.
Alaska Darin Posted February 6, 2010 Author Posted February 6, 2010 You don't think he's crossing a line by saying all W supporters (as deluded as they may have been) should be slaughtered in concentration camps? Oh, then he tells me I should be burned in public. You should take him seriously. Someday he's going to be somebody.
Magox Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 Ladairis is like the original anglo-saxon version of Malcolm X.
DC Tom Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 You don't think he's crossing a line by saying all W supporters (as deluded as they may have been) should be slaughtered in concentration camps? Oh, then he tells me I should be burned in public. I realize there's a lot of vitriol on this particular board, but legitimate hate speech like that should warrant a ban. I personally don't believe people should be banned for being hateful. Just disruptive. And in my opinion, that's a line LaDumbass dances on. But if he wants to advocate putting everyone in concentration camps and burning you alive...I think he not only has the right to say so, but I encourage him to say so, on the principle that idiots are less dangerous when they're out in the open.
LaDairis Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 Why? He's entitled to an opinion, and entitled to express it, and entitled to prove he's an idiot. Banning him would just be protecting him from himself. This from a self-proclaimed "science expert" who assured us that Al Gore is 100% right about "Global" "warming."
LaDairis Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 This **** is just comedy gold. All it's missing is "fraud" in capital letters. The documentation of treason against the US is only funny to those who hate the US, like those pushing The FRAUD of Global non-Warming. If you cannot refute it, first try to get the poster banned, and then just shout him down... Every word of that is 100% true. Rafsanjani won three straight elections, and only lost in 2005 in a run-off because of "Axis of Evil" and endless Iranian media coverage of Iraqi Sunnis blowing up Shia mosques, all 100% the doing of W. Once W was gone, the Iranian people voted out Ahmadinejad, but it was too late, as he and his nutjobs have taken over.
LaDairis Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 You don't think he's crossing a line by saying all W supporters (as deluded as they may have been) should be slaughtered in concentration camps? Oh, then he tells me I should be burned in public. I realize there's a lot of vitriol on this particular board, but legitimate hate speech like that should warrant a ban. What do you think should happen to documented traitors and those actively cheering treason against the US and the individual who harmed the US more than anyone in history??? A: a CHOSEN BAILOUT from Dual Citizen lifelong Dem Fed Chair CHOOSE'EM Ben Bernanke
LaDairis Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 Ladairis is like the original anglo-saxon version of Malcolm X. No, much earlier. Try 15th century Romania... where the same thing was happening there: the "nobles" were selling out the people to fight and die for a foreign entity in exchange for money and political power, and then someone named Vlad tried to stop it. W and the THUMPERS are no different than the "nobles" of Romania in the 15th century, and they deserve the same fate Vlad gave the nobles...
LaDairis Posted February 6, 2010 Posted February 6, 2010 You should take him seriously. Someday he's going to be somebody. Perhaps I would have been "somebody" two years ago had W not purged 7 Federal prosecutors for failing to follow W's doctrine that Madoff, the Rabbis in NJ selling Palestinian body parts, and the rest of the Zionists in the US were above the law. Hint: Madoff's indictment was Dec 12, 2008, or about three weeks into the DOJ transition. The only thing that kept Madoff from being indicted 2001-2008 was W and his non-stop appeasement of Zionists who hated his daddy.
Recommended Posts