DC Tom Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 are you kidding? this is when the dems are most dangerous. they have nothing to lose in shredding the constitution in these last 11 months of power. Remember when the lunatic left said that about Bush? Yeah, didn't happen either. But keep pretending you're not as big a lunatic as they are.
uncle_chappy Posted February 1, 2010 Author Posted February 1, 2010 Remember when the lunatic left said that about Bush? Yeah, didn't happen either. source please. this wouldn't just be a strawman would it?
DC Tom Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 source please. this wouldn't just be a strawman would it? You have GOT to be kidding me...
uncle_chappy Posted February 1, 2010 Author Posted February 1, 2010 You have GOT to be kidding me... i figured you were just pulling it out of your ass.
DC Tom Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 i figured you were just pulling it out of your ass. No, I'm not. Google it. You get lots of lunatics complaining about Bush's secret plans to suspend Constitutional law and cancel elections (in both '04 and '08). You sound just like them.
uncle_chappy Posted February 1, 2010 Author Posted February 1, 2010 No, I'm not. Google it. You get lots of lunatics complaining about Bush's secret plans to suspend Constitutional law and cancel elections (in both '04 and '08). You sound just like them. canceling the elections is a little more unrealistic than draconian carbon emission cuts, gun confiscation, and single payer health care, no?
Endzone Animal Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Connor wins the thread - not even close. A bit shocking, too...sort of like seeing a 30 handicap shooting a scratch round. You been sandbagging, or what?
DC Tom Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 canceling the elections is a little more unrealistic than draconian carbon emission cuts, gun confiscation, and single payer health care, no? Oh, so this hinges on the definition of "shredding the Constitution"? Specifically, on your looney right claim that your definition of "shredding the Constitution" is more valid than the looney left's? Or is it enough that I simply google "Bush shredding Constitution", and find that you sound even loonier than the results? Or you can just search commondreams.org for the same - and yes, you sound just as ridiculous as those people.
Endzone Animal Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 By default Hey, give credit where credit is do - he was pretty clever and humorous... though admittedly he had the perfect ignoramus to play the fool.
uncle_chappy Posted February 1, 2010 Author Posted February 1, 2010 Oh, so this hinges on the definition of "shredding the Constitution"? Specifically, on your looney right claim that your definition of "shredding the Constitution" is more valid than the looney left's? Or is it enough that I simply google "Bush shredding Constitution", and find that you sound even loonier than the results? Or you can just search commondreams.org for the same - and yes, you sound just as ridiculous as those people. gun confiscation isn't "shredding the constitution"? cap and trade isn't "shredding the constitution"? single payer isn't "shredding the constitution"? you're almost as dumb as conner.
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 gun confiscation isn't "shredding the constitution"? cap and trade isn't "shredding the constitution"? single payer isn't "shredding the constitution"? you're almost as dumb as conner. Here is a link especially for you: US Constitution
LeviF Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Here is a link especially for you: US Constitution
DC Tom Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 cap and trade isn't "shredding the constitution"? Nope. Stupid, but not unconstitutional. single payer isn't "shredding the constitution"? Nope. Again, stupid, but not unconstitutional. gun confiscation isn't "shredding the constitution"? you're almost as dumb as conner. Yes, it is...but before tossing around such epithets as "dumb as conner", maybe you should provide a story about gun confiscation that takes place somewhere other than CANADA, dumbass.
uncle_chappy Posted February 1, 2010 Author Posted February 1, 2010 Yes, it is...but before tossing around such epithets as "dumb as conner", maybe you should provide a story about gun confiscation that takes place somewhere other than CANADA, dumbass. and obama wants to bring everything from western europe and canada to america you freaking moron. jesus you're even dumber than conner.
blzrul Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 and obama wants to bring everything from western europe and canada to america you freaking moron. jesus you're even dumber than conner. hahahaha you're funny, troll boy.
DC Tom Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 and obama wants to bring everything from western europe and canada to america you freaking moron. jesus you're even dumber than conner. Yeah, next thing you know Obama's going to be putting the queen on our money and switch us to the metric system. You must be having fun play-acting. Because nobody can naturally be this stupid.
Magox Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Because nobody can naturally be this stupid. Check it Owens Mania
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 and obama wants to bring everything from western europe and canada to america you freaking moron. jesus you're even dumber than conner. Ya... I like to see him bring that over the Thousand Islands Bridge! No way does customs let it in!
uncle_chappy Posted February 1, 2010 Author Posted February 1, 2010 Yeah, next thing you know Obama's going to be putting the queen on our money and switch us to the metric system. idiot, im talking about single payer, cap and trade and a gun confiscation-3 things that obama wouldn't hesitate to do if given the chance.
Recommended Posts