BeastMode54 Posted January 31, 2010 Posted January 31, 2010 how many restricted free agent players would be on the market if this wasn't an uncapped year? not saying we would have gotten a lot of high profile FA"s, but the pool would have been MUCH bigger to choose from. The pickens are pretty slim now
Doc Posted January 31, 2010 Posted January 31, 2010 Something like 221 more players would be UFA's, and that's not counting the (potentially 96) players who can be franchise and transition tagged.
DarthICE Posted January 31, 2010 Posted January 31, 2010 I wouldn't count on signing anyone this offseason to be honest. Too many UFA's now won't be, many more RFA's just got extended. Then add in two tags available in a non capped year. Unless Nix and complany can spot a diamond in the rough, I say just prepare for the draft.
Erik Posted January 31, 2010 Posted January 31, 2010 I wouldn't count on signing anyone this offseason to be honest. Too many UFA's now won't be, many more RFA's just got extended. Then add in two tags available in a non capped year. Unless Nix and complany can spot a diamond in the rough, I say just prepare for the draft. The only thing that will help the market will be overpriced veterans being cut from their bloated contracts, and a rebuilding team really shouldn't have any interest in those kinds of guys anyway, unless we can find, say a NT like Rogers out there.
BeastMode54 Posted January 31, 2010 Author Posted January 31, 2010 I wouldn't mind a veteran like Chris Chambers to add to WR core, especially if we lose Reed.
JStranger76 Posted January 31, 2010 Posted January 31, 2010 Someone started a Chambers thread the other day and I'm also on board with it. I'd go as far to say target him and Kevin Walter or a TE like Ben Watson to pair with Nelson. We have to make at least a decent splash in free agency the draft alone WILL NOT cut it....... get a couple skill guys and a LB in free agency and add beef in the draft. That's how it's done.
BillsGuyInMalta Posted January 31, 2010 Posted January 31, 2010 I really hope the Bills go hard after Levi Jones. I know we had this conversation last summer but he actually ended up helping Washington's O-Line tremendously down the stretch. If we can bring him in and re-sign Incognito and Simmons, that will at least free up our draft choices quite considerably.
bkc Posted January 31, 2010 Posted January 31, 2010 how many restricted free agent players would be on the market if this wasn't an uncapped year? not saying we would have gotten a lot of high profile FA"s, but the pool would have been MUCH bigger to choose from. The pickens are pretty slim now worse time this could happen. Last time me had a change in regime we made some big buys, not good buys, but big buys, dockery , walker.
Pygskin36 Posted January 31, 2010 Posted January 31, 2010 worse time this could happen. Last time me had a change in regime we made some big buys, not good buys, but big buys, dockery , walker. There is never a good time for this to happen, but this also gives Nix and Gailey a pass in year one IMO.. Be prepared for a step back before we can go forward.. this won't be well received, but its probably going to be the case. Its the right way to do it...
Thoner7 Posted January 31, 2010 Posted January 31, 2010 The only thing that will help the market will be overpriced veterans being cut from their bloated contracts, and a rebuilding team really shouldn't have any interest in those kinds of guys anyway, unless we can find, say a NT like Rogers out there. Matt Light may be a casualty of just that. He would really help out our team moving forward as he can still play well and give us a lot of flexibility with the draft.
JStranger76 Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Forgot about Light. The same may happen with Jamal Brown of the Saints. Either guy could catapult a very successful offseason should the front office have the balls to do what it takes to land one of those guys.
bkc Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Matt Light may be a casualty of just that. He would really help out our team moving forward as he can still play well and give us a lot of flexibility with the draft. That would be good If we are going 3/4 we need a lot of help up front
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 how many restricted free agent players would be on the market if this wasn't an uncapped year? not saying we would have gotten a lot of high profile FA"s, but the pool would have been MUCH bigger to choose from. The pickens are pretty slim now Get ready for a lockout in 2011 as well and maybe the uncapped year may find the Owners playing hardball and not offering deals leaving most FA on their current team
nucci Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Get ready for a lockout in 2011 as well and maybe the uncapped year may find the Owners playing hardball and not offering deals leaving most FA on their current team and also expect players to hold out more like they did in the '70's.
Trader Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 There is never a good time for this to happen, but this also gives Nix and Gailey a pass in year one IMO.. Be prepared for a step back before we can go forward.. this won't be well received, but its probably going to be the case. Its the right way to do it... You are absolutely correct. They need to build in the draft right now. In a few years if they can make a run. That is the time to break the bank and go after 3-4 free agents that can put them deep into the playoffs. Right now it's just a waste of time and cash better spent elsewhere. The next two or three years needs to be spent building a solid foundation.
Bill from NYC Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 I wouldn't count on signing anyone this offseason to be honest. Too many UFA's now won't be, many more RFA's just got extended. Then add in two tags available in a non capped year. Unless Nix and complany can spot a diamond in the rough, I say just prepare for the draft. And if it stays like this, draft picks would appear to be worth more. Wouldn't this make sense? Trading down might be a good option if we can get more value than the traditional value chart would dictate. Just thinking out loud......
kasper13 Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Could get real ugly. No salary cap in 2010 and a possible lockout in 2011. I saw a thing in the NY Daily News yesterday that had all the scenarios and what it all means. No cap also means no minimum payroll. Teams can spend as little as they want and make a huge profit for the year. Anyone with non-guaranteed money can be cut with no penalty to the team. What do you think Ralph will do? Spend money or turn into the Pittsburgh Pirates and rake in as much cash as possible while claiming the team is rebuilding? I don't think the Bills are going to sign any free agents that would be helpful at all. I do wonder what having no cap does to the draft picks. Do teams keep paying the 1st round picks insane amounts of cash or not? Unrestricted free agency changed from 4 to 6 years, teams really want to give guys guaranteed money for 6 years with most 1st rounders being busts? Should be interesting. Most Bills fans expect the team to rebuild and get better. I expect them to clean house as far as veteran players go, not sign any free agents and be worse than 2009. I also expect there to be no NFL football in 2011. It's a big, giant mess just waiting to happen.
PromoTheRobot Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Just as well. You know what it's like getting anyone to come to the Bills. PTR
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 how many restricted free agent players would be on the market if this wasn't an uncapped year? not saying we would have gotten a lot of high profile FA"s, but the pool would have been MUCH bigger to choose from. The pickens are pretty slim now Good; it means that this team can't make any more idiotic free agent moves. Let's just have a good draft, and play with the guys we have. I'm of the view that good coaching can also account for a few more wins this year.
Recommended Posts