/dev/null Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2..._911_terro.html
IDBillzFan Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 I'd suggest they try him in California, but all we'd do is give him citizenship and a union card. The larger issue is that they'll just keep looking until they find a state stupid enough to take the trial. This should be done in a military tribunal, but no....we need to give KSM a world audience to share his story so the world can see how nice we are. We may as well just dress this country in a poodle skirt. We couldn't be more pussified if we tried.
drnykterstein Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 sissy republicans are all scared of this idiot. lol, grow a pair.
IDBillzFan Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 sissy republicans are all scared of this idiot. lol, grow a pair. Hard to argue with that, Conner. We all know how many sissy Republicans there are in NYC. They should try KSM in city filled with fearless, manly Democrats. Like San Francisco, maybe.
KD in CA Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Hard to argue with that, Conner. We all know how many sissy Republicans there are in NYC. They should try KSM in city filled with fearless, manly Democrats. Like San Francisco, maybe. Considering Nancy is about the most fearless and manly of the Democrats, that's not a bad idea.
DC Tom Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Like it matters. Under any court in the country, the case should be dismissed immediately on procedural grounds - namely, that he was never properly extradited from Pakistan.
Magox Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Yet another miscalculation from an appointee of the Obama administration. Of course with the democrats peeling off two and three at a time, rejecting this idea of trying KSM in Manhattan, going into a tough election year, it looks as if the real sissy's here are the liberals who all of a sudden changed their position. Looks like Scott Brown turned the whole "progressive" agenda upside down.
uncle_chappy Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Looks like Scott Brown turned the whole "progressive" agenda upside down. TGFSB (thank god for scott brown)
ExiledInIllinois Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 TGFSB (thank god for scott brown) Obama will just sit down with his 10th cuz and get it done! TGFSBTGTKOG (Thank God For Scott Brown The Gift That Keeps On Giving)
GG Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 sissy republicans are all scared of this idiot. lol, grow a pair. That sissy republican by the name of Chuck Schumer?
Chef Jim Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Hard to argue with that, Conner. We all know how many sissy Republicans there are in NYC. They should try KSM in city filled with fearless, manly Democrats. Like San Francisco, maybe. You have no idea. Let me tell you a story. They've been having an issue with street "toughs" (their word not mine) on Ashbury roughing people up for money. Kind of a "give me money or I won't let you pass" situation and I think they're actually roughing people up who don't comply. And the sissy liberals have been shaking in their boots over this. There is actually a liberal group that is worried that the people opposed to this will use "vigilante" tactics against these poor homeless people. My tactic would be first to laugh in their face and then pull out my phone and dial 911 until the cops came. I think that would put a stop these street toughs pretty quickly.
Magox Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 TGFSBTGTKOG (Thank God For Scott Brown The Gift That Keeps On Giving) In the famous words of Sarah Palin "You betcha!" He's got all the Libs quaking in their high heels.
Jim in Anchorage Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 You have no idea. Let me tell you a story. They've been having an issue with street "toughs" (their word not mine) on Ashbury roughing people up for money. Kind of a "give me money or I won't let you pass" situation and I think they're actually roughing people up who don't comply. And the sissy liberals have been shaking in their boots over this. There is actually a liberal group that is worried that the people opposed to this will use "vigilante" tactics against these poor homeless people. My tactic would be first to laugh in their face and then pull out my phone and dial 911 until the cops came. .45 ACP and shoot till they stop breathing I think that would put a stop these street toughs pretty quickly. Good plan.
ExiledInIllinois Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 In the famous words of Sarah Palin "You betcha!" He's got all the Libs quaking in their high heels. Really... I think he will be a good ally.
Chef Jim Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Good plan. My wife asked me "what if they hit you?" and I said "well I have fists too" which she replied "oh great, so you can share a cell with him." Good point.
Jim in Anchorage Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 My wife asked me "what if they hit you?" and I said "well I have fists too" which she replied "oh great, so you can share a cell with him." Good point. I think you need to get out of California for awhile
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 What's up with NYers? You'd think they'd want to try this piece of shizz in NYC.
Chef Jim Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 I think you need to get out of California for awhile I'll be in WNY at the end of February. That should chase me back here pretty quickly.
GG Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 What's up with NYers? You'd think they'd want to try this piece of shizz in NYC. It's not so much the trial, but the resulting circus that will accompany it. The place is crowded enough as it is, like you need more choke points downtown. No thanks.
Recommended Posts