Jump to content

Radio Host calls Condi Rice -Aunt Jemima


millbank

Recommended Posts

A radio host apologized Monday for calling secretary of state nominee Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites) "Aunt Jemima," but refused to back down from his criticism that she is a "black trophy" of the Bush administration.

John "Sly" Sylvester, the program director and morning personality on WTDY-AM, wrote a letter of apology to local newspapers.

 

"I'm concerned that I have offended many African-Americans by using a crass term to describe an incompetent, dishonest political appointee of the Bush administration. I apologize," wrote Sylvester, who is white.

 

Sylvester wrote he would not, however, apologize for criticizing Rice, saying "she has allowed herself to be used as a black trophy by an administration

 

-So that is it, on he goes blabbering his garbage?

 

 

Comments

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What great advertising. Of course he's a scumbag.

 

I heard this guy on our local Conservative talkshow yesterday and his schtick is to say outrageous things and be offensive - at a political level. Imagine a liberal amalgam of Stern and Limbaugh. He was calling callers stupid, telling Conservatives to get back to the Klan rally, etc. That he called Rice Aunt Jemima is no surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A radio host apologized Monday for calling secretary of state nominee Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites) "Aunt Jemima," but refused to back down from his criticism that she is a "black trophy" of the Bush administration.

John "Sly" Sylvester, the program director and morning personality on WTDY-AM, wrote a letter of apology to local newspapers.

 

"I'm concerned that I have offended many African-Americans by using a crass term to describe an incompetent, dishonest political appointee of the Bush administration. I apologize," wrote Sylvester, who is white.

 

Sylvester wrote he would not, however, apologize for criticizing Rice, saying "she has allowed herself to be used as a black trophy by an administration

 

-So  that is it, on he goes blabbering his garbage?

Comments

130195[/snapback]

I guess he will go on but with a lot less credibility than he had before, assuming he had any to start with.

 

I am no fan of Rice, I think she has been a light weight and will continue to be so as Secrtetary of State however, there are lines and whoever this guy is, he crossed that line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yea, but of course he appoligized so everything is all Ok now in liberal land.

 

If a white repulican would have said the same thing about a black person, the blood letting would nt stop until dan blather and friends squeezed the last little drop out of his dead hide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yea, but of course he appoligized so everything is all Ok now in liberal land.

 

If a white repulican would have said the same thing about a black person, the blood letting would nt stop until dan blather and friends squeezed the last little drop out of his dead hide.

130609[/snapback]

 

Liberals are allowed to hate Rich. It's just the way it is....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe you would me a little more threatened if you were the brother of say, Emmitt Till? Knowing the guys that killed him have the same constituent base as the modern Republicans.

 

Maybe that is why they don't get the benefit of the doubt Rich?

 

What you expect everything to be equal?

 

Name a liberal counter point to this tale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liberals are allowed to hate Rich.  It's just the way it is....

130624[/snapback]

Unlike conservatives who can't get away with anything which is why Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage, Falwell, Robertson, Dobson, Jones, Schlesinger, O'Reilly, Liddy, North and lord knows how many others are unemployed selling pencils in the park. Whooops. Forgot. They have millions of adoring fans applauding every bit of hatred they have oozed out of their slime-holes for the last 12 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unlike conservatives who can't get away with anything which is why Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage, Falwell, Robertson, Dobson, Jones, Schlesinger, O'Reilly, Liddy, North and lord knows how many others are unemployed selling pencils in the park.  Whooops.  Forgot.  They have millions of adoring fans applauding every bit of hatred they have oozed out of their slime-holes for the last 12 years.

130762[/snapback]

 

Blah, blah, blah...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unlike conservatives who can't get away with anything which is why Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage, Falwell, Robertson, Dobson, Jones, Schlesinger, O'Reilly, Liddy, North and lord knows how many others are unemployed selling pencils in the park.  Whooops.  Forgot.  They have millions of adoring fans applauding every bit of hatred they have oozed out of their slime-holes for the last 12 years.

130762[/snapback]

1. If they're selling pencils in the park they aren't unemployed. Chances are, they also aren't conservatives.

 

2. You don't get to whine about the other side if you give a free pass to your own. That's called hypocrisy. There were a ton of people ripping Mr. Limbaugh for his comments about Donovan McNabb. Where are these people now? Why is this not a widely reported story?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.  If they're selling pencils in the park, they aren't unemployed.  Chances are, they also aren't conservatives.

 

2.  You don't get to whine about the other side if you give a free pass to your own.  That's called hypocrisy.  There were a ton of people ripping Mr. Limbaugh for his comments about Donovan McNabb.  Where are these people now?  Why is this not a widely reported story?

130919[/snapback]

I can't speak for whoever "these people" are, but I posted a critical comment regarding what he said. So I agree about the hypocrisy thing but don't see why it is being mentioned in response to my post.

 

I assume you are planning to comment on the hypocrisy of those calling for this guy's head who have never been critical of all the right wing creeps I mentioned but just haven't got around to it? One could argue that it is hypocritical to comment on the hypocrisy of one side while ignoring the hypocrisy of those on the other side.

 

This guy is a nobody from nowhere. I have never heard of him. As bad as he apparently is, people with huge audiences like Coulter and Limbaugh are of more concern to me when it comes to beyond the pale rhetoric.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't speak for whoever "these people" are, but I posted a critical comment regarding what he said.  So I agree about the hypocrisy thing but don't see why it is being mentioned in response to my post. 

 

I assume you are planning to comment on the hypocrisy of those calling for this guy's head who have never been critical of all the right wing creeps I mentioned but just haven't got around to it?  One could argue that it is hypocritical to comment on the hypocrisy of one side while ignoring the hypocrisy of those on the other side. 

 

This guy is a nobody from nowhere.  I have never heard of him.  As bad as he apparently is, people with huge audiences like Coulter and Limbaugh are of more concern to me when it comes to beyond the pale rhetoric.

130998[/snapback]

They're all a concern to me. That's why I tend not to listen to any of them. Occasionally I listen to Hannity on the radio because he interviews alot of Congressmen.

 

You find one post of mine that has something lauditory of Limbaugh, Coulter, Ingraham, etc.

 

I don't care if he's a nobody. If he were some 2-bit conservative from Sheboygan CNN would be leading with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...