SDS Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 I would like to state upfront what the policy is here, and I'm embarrassed that it has to be spelled out for some of you. We have some special guests here that provide their time, knowledge and insight to us and for that we are grateful. They do this for free. We welcome their participation and we will do what we need to do in order to facilitate that. Feel free to engage these individuals with your questions and your comments in a reasoned, tactful manner. You don't have to like what they report. You don't have to agree with what they report. But I can assure you that from this point forward your engagement with them on THIS forum will be respectful. If you can't phrase your comment or objection as if these individuals were sitting across the dinner table from you - then just keep it to yourself. Plain and simple. Just don't write it. If you lack restraint - we will quickly provide that for you. We wish you luck in your future endeavors. This goes for old-timers and newbies alike. For those of you wanting to argue this - don't bother. I will not side with your lack of civility, I will not side with ignorant ramblings over professionalism. Let me reiterate, tactful criticism and skepticism are welcomed. Being a rude jackass is not.
SDS Posted January 22, 2010 Author Posted January 22, 2010 I assume we get an exemption for ragging on jw in the "Last Post Wins" thread, at least? This really applies to their day jobs and the work they do in support of that. Anyone who engages in politics/musical/misc... banter knows the deal when they enter that world.
Reed83HOF Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 It's sad that this really needs to be spelled out.... but overall a nice well worded reminder...good job SDS
JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 You act like you OWN this forum or something...
Steely Dan Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 I can't believe it has to be spelled out either. This really applies to their day jobs and the work they do in support of that. Anyone who engages in politics/musical/misc... banter knows the deal when they enter that world. I think Dev's thread should finally be closed and all should hail the much better thread!! Which is, of course, mine. Mine has Riboflavin, Dev's offers no nutritive value at all. Just sayin.
BuffaloBill Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 SDS thank you for all that you do to keep this forum going. It is sad to see that some elected to step outside acceptable norms.
Just Jack Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 Anyone who engages in politics/musical/misc... banter knows the deal when they enter that world. I like Evita.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 Except for Wawrow, right? Can we treat him like the stinky, drunken canuck he is?
VanCity Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 Uhhh..yeah...cuz he started the thing...... Thanks again SDS!
DrFishfinder Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 Couldn't agree more. That being scribed.... respectfully asking you to please back it up.
Just Jack Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 Are you really the #1 member?? That's right #13056
K-9 Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 I would like to state upfront what the policy is here, and I'm embarrassed that it has to be spelled out for some of you. We have some special guests here that provide their time, knowledge and insight to us and for that we are grateful. They do this for free. We welcome their participation and we will do what we need to do in order to facilitate that. Feel free to engage these individuals with your questions and your comments in a reasoned, tactful manner. You don't have to like what they report. You don't have to agree with what they report. But I can assure you that from this point forward your engagement with them on THIS forum will be respectful. If you can't phrase your comment or objection as if these individuals were sitting across the dinner table from you - then just keep it to yourself. Plain and simple. Just don't write it. If you lack restraint - we will quickly provide that for you. We wish you luck in your future endeavors. This goes for old-timers and newbies alike. For those of you wanting to argue this - don't bother. I will not side with your lack of civility, I will not side with ignorant ramblings over professionalism. Let me reiterate, tactful criticism and skepticism are welcomed. Being a rude jackass is not. So who died and made you boss? I keed. I keed. Sad we need the reminder. Thanks for all you've done over the years, Scott. GO BILLS!!!
gmp3 Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 I know I've done much more reading than posting, but I visit this site at least a few times a day while on the road. I was honestly floored with some of the insane comments in the Tim Graham threads....I mean, asking someone to out a source? That was just nuts. Thanks SDS for keeping this board civil and giving Bills fans a place to discuss the team and vent...within reason. Your message was well crafted, and I'm glad you'll take action to remove those who can't play by the rules.
Bart Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 I would like to state upfront what the policy is here, and I'm embarrassed that it has to be spelled out for some of you. We have some special guests here that provide their time, knowledge and insight to us and for that we are grateful. They do this for free. We welcome their participation and we will do what we need to do in order to facilitate that. Feel free to engage these individuals with your questions and your comments in a reasoned, tactful manner. You don't have to like what they report. You don't have to agree with what they report. But I can assure you that from this point forward your engagement with them on THIS forum will be respectful. If you can't phrase your comment or objection as if these individuals were sitting across the dinner table from you - then just keep it to yourself. Plain and simple. Just don't write it. If you lack restraint - we will quickly provide that for you. We wish you luck in your future endeavors. This goes for old-timers and newbies alike. For those of you wanting to argue this - don't bother. I will not side with your lack of civility, I will not side with ignorant ramblings over professionalism. Let me reiterate, tactful criticism and skepticism are welcomed. Being a rude jackass is not. How bout jail time for violators?
billsfan_34 Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 I would like to state upfront what the policy is here, and I'm embarrassed that it has to be spelled out for some of you. We have some special guests here that provide their time, knowledge and insight to us and for that we are grateful. They do this for free. We welcome their participation and we will do what we need to do in order to facilitate that. Feel free to engage these individuals with your questions and your comments in a reasoned, tactful manner. You don't have to like what they report. You don't have to agree with what they report. But I can assure you that from this point forward your engagement with them on THIS forum will be respectful. If you can't phrase your comment or objection as if these individuals were sitting across the dinner table from you - then just keep it to yourself. Plain and simple. Just don't write it. If you lack restraint - we will quickly provide that for you. We wish you luck in your future endeavors. This goes for old-timers and newbies alike. For those of you wanting to argue this - don't bother. I will not side with your lack of civility, I will not side with ignorant ramblings over professionalism. Let me reiterate, tactful criticism and skepticism are welcomed. Being a rude jackass is not. Thank you :-)
BigBuff423 Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 For my full thoughts on this post just check out my reply to Tim's suggestion of possibly "shutting this down" in regards to his exclusive thread. So to keep it short, THANK YOU!!!! I whole-heartedly agree and wish that your class and kuth could be the standard rather than the exception.
Recommended Posts