Craiger93 Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 Maybe if they want to let Modrak go, there are waiting until they get all of is Input that he's been developing for this year's draft. If they let him go now, maybe we'll lose some of the data that he's gathered throughout this year on specific college players. That is, that the data he has is GOOD and ACCURATE. and worhty of using.
PromoTheRobot Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 Maybe if they want to let Modrak go, there are waiting until they get all of is Input that he's been developing for this year's draft. If they let him go now, maybe we'll lose some of the data that he's gathered throughout this year on specific college players. That is, that the data he has is GOOD and ACCURATE. and worhty of using. Want to bet your lunch money on that? PTR
JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 Maybe if they want to let Modrak go, there are waiting until they get all of is Input that he's been developing for this year's draft. If they let him go now, maybe we'll lose some of the data that he's gathered throughout this year on specific college players. That is, that the data he has is GOOD and ACCURATE. and worhty of using. If he's so bad you're going to fire him, you don't let him run a draft that's this important. You fire him ASAP if you're gonna, or you keep him.
Josh Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 I recall Nevergiveup saying something to this effect a while ago, that Modrak was likely gone after the draft or staying in a consultant role or something.
Coach Tuesday Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 I am so freakin' sick of these thread titles that are disguised as news items but then ask questions instead.
Canadian Bills Fan Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 Maybe if they want to let Modrak go, there are waiting until they get all of is Input that he's been developing for this year's draft. If they let him go now, maybe we'll lose some of the data that he's gathered throughout this year on specific college players. That is, that the data he has is GOOD and ACCURATE. and worhty of using. Why would they want his input? We havent done that well in recent drafts
Simon Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 [This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive subject lines. The topic starter can edit the subject line to make it more appropriate. Thank you.
Recommended Posts