bkc Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8...mp;confirm=true Look how high the tackles went We were debating if a davis would be a reach at 9 yikes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Bills Fan Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 That is a horrible mock draft. There is no way Bradford falls to # 26 and no way Claussen does not go in the first round Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8...mp;confirm=true Look how high the tackles went We were debating if a davis would be a reach at 9 yikes Thanks for the link - Davis is getting a lot of talk lately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. ChumChums Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 That's a pick I'd be ok with, honestly. But then again...there's a lot of picks I'd be ok with...we have THAT many needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkc Posted January 20, 2010 Author Share Posted January 20, 2010 That is a horrible mock draft. There is no way Bradford falls to # 26 and no way Claussen does not go in the first round it is early and we will see a lot of them but 4 tackles in the top 9 jumped out at me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jo39416 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8...mp;confirm=true Look how high the tackles went We were debating if a davis would be a reach at 9 yikes Did anyone notice who wrote the article? Bucky Brooks? That kid was awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribo Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Only one QB in the first round? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d8...mp;confirm=true Look how high the tackles went We were debating if a davis would be a reach at 9 yikes This mock is beyond idiotic. And from a former second round Bills pick, no less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Did anyone notice who wrote the article? Bucky Brooks? That kid was awful. Not true at all. He looked great in preseason for the Bills, and suffered a devastating knee injury. There's a big difference between sucking and getting badly injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Awful mock. Not really much more to say. There is no way a QB falls out of the top 15 picks. this is a weak-ass QB class. not one of them is worthy of a top 10 pick IMO. i wouldnt be surprised if they slide out of the front half of the round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkc Posted January 20, 2010 Author Share Posted January 20, 2010 quaterbacks slide some years, quinn, rodgers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 oooooooooooo i get it. A "mock" draft. That guy is good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DasNootz Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 I'd take McClain over Cambell in this situation. Most likely we're going to be drafting mid to early next season too. Why not get the best LB in the draft this year, and hope for better than the 4th best LT in next year's draft? How much success is a rookie LT going to have with on this team in year 1 anyway? He's going to be in the trenches next to a second year player. I'd rather address LT through Free Agency or via a trade (any takers for Marshawn?). Bringing in McClain means giving a rookie a chance to succeed. Paired on the inside with Poz on a 3-4, or moving Poz to the outside on a 4-3, he'll have a chance to become an immediate impact on defense. Sometimes you have to put your best people in your biggest oppurtunities, rather than your biggest problem spots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_red Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Trent Williams at 4, lol. Derrick Morgan isn't a 34 LB. Carlos Dunlap just ballz. no QB till 26? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 I'd take McClain over Cambell in this situation. Most likely we're going to be drafting mid to early next season too. Why not get the best LB in the draft this year, and hope for better than the 4th best LT in next year's draft? How much success is a rookie LT going to have with on this team in year 1 anyway? He's going to be in the trenches next to a second year player. I'd rather address LT through Free Agency or via a trade (any takers for Marshawn?). Bringing in McClain means giving a rookie a chance to succeed. Paired on the inside with Poz on a 3-4, or moving Poz to the outside on a 4-3, he'll have a chance to become an immediate impact on defense. Sometimes you have to put your best people in your biggest oppurtunities, rather than your biggest problem spots. i feel the exact same way. if youre looking for players to make an immediate impact as rookies, McClain is the way to go (over the 3rd or 4th LT). at that point, youre better off drafting the 5th or 6th OT with your 2nd round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bananathumb Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Seems about right. Clausen has been the number 1 pick for months on most mock drafts, but he'll drop. No-one wants to risk a top choice on anyone as questionable as him or Bradford. They'll slide. The OTs are the stars of this draft, along with Mr. Suh and Mr. McCoy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts