Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 17, 2010 Posted January 17, 2010 Has just reinforced for me how far away the Bills are from an offensive perspective. These teamsseem able to move the ball through the air at will, it's almost like you're watching a different sport. If these games are not proof to you that a team MUST over all other concerns have a stellar QB, then you are insane. No OL can make losers like Ryan Fitzpatrick look like Joe Montana.
/dev/null Posted January 17, 2010 Posted January 17, 2010 No OL can make losers like Ryan Fitzpatrick look like Joe Montana. But our OL could make Joe Montana look like a loser like Ryan Fitzpatrick
Bob in STL Posted January 18, 2010 Posted January 18, 2010 Has just reinforced for me how far away the Bills are from an offensive perspective. These teamsseem able to move the ball through the air at will, it's almost like you're watching a different sport. If these games are not proof to you that a team MUST over all other concerns have a stellar QB, then you are insane. No OL can make losers like Ryan Fitzpatrick look like Joe Montana. Your right. We are so used to havinga poor OL and no QB that maybe we forget what its is like to play offense properly.
DarthICE Posted January 18, 2010 Posted January 18, 2010 Has just reinforced for me how far away the Bills are from an offensive perspective. These teamsseem able to move the ball through the air at will, it's almost like you're watching a different sport. If these games are not proof to you that a team MUST over all other concerns have a stellar QB, then you are insane. No OL can make losers like Ryan Fitzpatrick look like Joe Montana. Bingo. Everyone screams about the lines but if we had a stud QB I guarantee you we won more games this year. Bottom line it is a QB driven league, without one your team sucks
Lofton80 Posted January 18, 2010 Posted January 18, 2010 Absolutely agree ! Have to have a good one. Enough with the B listers
KD in CA Posted January 18, 2010 Posted January 18, 2010 Has just reinforced for me how far away the Bills are from an offensive perspective. Defensive too. No way in hell could their shrimpy front 7 put up an effort like the Jets or Vikings today.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 18, 2010 Author Posted January 18, 2010 Defensive too. No way in hell could their shrimpy front 7 put up an effort like the Jets or Vikings today. I think the D is OK enough. Maybe not Super Bowl caliber, but if the O was remotely competent...who knows.
Doc Posted January 18, 2010 Posted January 18, 2010 I believe this thread has been started after EVERY weekend of play, after a game between 2 good teams.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 18, 2010 Author Posted January 18, 2010 I believe this thread has been started after EVERY weekend of play, after a game between 2 good teams. Thanks for your input. Really. Good stuff.
Doc Posted January 18, 2010 Posted January 18, 2010 Thanks for your input. Really. Good stuff. Likewise.
Astrojanitor Posted January 18, 2010 Posted January 18, 2010 there's just an energy in play when a team like the Saints or Vikings are. i think it comes from the Bills both being horrible and the Bills being fully aware of being pretty terrible.
nichebiche Posted January 18, 2010 Posted January 18, 2010 Has just reinforced for me how far away the Bills are from an offensive perspective. These teamsseem able to move the ball through the air at will, it's almost like you're watching a different sport. If these games are not proof to you that a team MUST over all other concerns have a stellar QB, then you are insane. No OL can make losers like Ryan Fitzpatrick look like Joe Montana. i guess you just had something else to do during both Jets games.
Recommended Posts