Dr. K Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 Fewell had them playing like a real football team, despite the shaky personnel and injuries. Whoever they end up with is not going to be better. IMHO.
Buffalo 66 Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 :unsure: Fewell had them playing like a real football team, despite the shaky personnel and injuries. Whoever they end up with is not going to be better. IMHO.
jack_spikes Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 :unsure: At least Perry wanted the job. Not sure it would have satisfied those wanting to see the house cleaning or "big splash"
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 Good God people... if Fewell had been hired, this board would have imploded... "Another inside hire.." "Ralph is evil and senile..." "This team has no imagination..." The number of posts from ICE alone would have flooded the server.
Dr. Fong Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 Well with your expectations set that low I don't think you'll have to worry about being disappointed with whomever the Bills get to coach.
BB2004 Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 Fewell had them playing like a real football team, despite the shaky personnel and injuries. Whoever they end up with is not going to be better. IMHO. Disagree. I think that we are waiting to interview Jason Garrett from Dallas and I am all for that.
KOKBILLS Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 Fewell had them playing like a real football team, despite the shaky personnel and injuries. Whoever they end up with is not going to be better. IMHO. No thanks...Clean break was needed...I like Perry...But not that much...
SDS Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 that's really unfair considering you have no idea who will be hired.
RTW2012 Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 Fewell had them playing like a real football team, despite the shaky personnel and injuries. Whoever they end up with is not going to be better. IMHO. Too bad Perry's defense couldn't play like a real football team in the last quarter of the season opener against New England.
rsxfirefighter Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 Too bad Perry's defense couldn't play like a real football team in the last quarter of the season opener against New England. Umm...the last time I watched that game....wasnt it more the fact of Bobby April's Special Teams didnt play smart football?
Dr. K Posted January 16, 2010 Author Posted January 16, 2010 that's really unfair considering you have no idea who will be hired. Right. I am unfair.
RTW2012 Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 Umm...the last time I watched that game....wasnt it more the fact of Bobby April's Special Teams didnt play smart football? Umm, the special teams didn't allow 2 TDs in the last 5 minutes, the defense did.
bigskyfan Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 At least Perry wanted the job. Not sure it would have satisfied those wanting to see the house cleaning or "big splash" I want a housecleaning, but in the front office, not necessarily with Perry Fewell. Perry was much more competent in his role than Brandon, Modrak, Nix, Guy are in theirs,,,,,unfortunately the wrong people are being let go.
Bufcomments Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 If the Bills had beat NE the second time and played better in Atlanta he might have had a better chance. I liked Perry, I think he liked the players and the players liked him. But we had to let him go because we need a clean break from the Jauron Era
DarthICE Posted January 16, 2010 Posted January 16, 2010 Ok why didn't anyone but us give Fewell a HC interview? No one else thinks he is HC material right now. We made the right call.
ganesh Posted January 17, 2010 Posted January 17, 2010 Fewell had them playing like a real football team, despite the shaky personnel and injuries. Whoever they end up with is not going to be better. IMHO. My problem with keeping Fewell would be the direction we would have gone in picking an experienced good OC and a QB. Fewell was sold on Fitzpatrick over Edwards and would have continued to start Fitz into next season, considering the slim pickings in FA. The key for the Bills this year is going to be to get a good OC and DC and less focus on the HC.
Tasmo Posted January 17, 2010 Posted January 17, 2010 My problem with keeping Fewell would be the direction we would have gone in picking an experienced good OC and a QB. Fewell was sold on Fitzpatrick over Edwards and would have continued to start Fitz into next season, considering the slim pickings in FA. The key for the Bills this year is going to be to get a good OC and DC and less focus on the HC. Agreed. When they take this thing apart they'll need all the help they can get putting it back together. Just like Nix said, they need to get teachers that can work together to develop players. I am so sick of seeing players start in Buffalo and then go outside the organization and make it big when they get into a good system with support.
uforesircher Posted January 17, 2010 Posted January 17, 2010 Fewell had them playing like a real football team, despite the shaky personnel and injuries. Whoever they end up with is not going to be better. IMHO. i would agree with you if you were right - but you are not - on a few levels.
billsfan89 Posted January 17, 2010 Posted January 17, 2010 Well I would rather have Leslie Frazier then Fewell. Fewell was just a shot in the arm the team needed but its pretty easy to get a team pumped to play after they were lulled to sleep by DJ for 10 games plus an offseason. Frazier seems like a Tony Dungy type who comes from a successful pedigree with the Colts and Vikes. Now is Frazier my 1st choice no the Tampa 2 thing scares me. Fewell was a DJ disciple who would have been 2-5 as interim head coach had the Colts not tanked the last game of the season. Fewell is a Tampa 2 guy as well and while I liked the job he did it wasn't exactly spectacular.
Recommended Posts