Chef Jim Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 It was completely predictable that someone would make that argument. I've also seen it blamed on HAARP and the US Navy (who apparently fired an earthquake missile at Cuba, but missed). I love conspiracy theorists... HAARP?? Are they in Cincinnati? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RI Bills Fan Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 It was completely predictable that someone would make that argument. I've also seen it blamed on HAARP and the US Navy (who apparently fired an earthquake missile at Cuba, but missed). I love conspiracy theorists... Amazing what a single carefully calibrated active sonar pulse aimed at exactly the right geological location can do... Isn't it? I'm just sayin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 You think that's a lot???? A radio talk show in that broadcasts in LA only (at least it used to) gets 1 million a day. Radio/TV... Two different beasts... Can't watch TV while driving in the car. Okay, maybe one can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 I've also seen it blamed on HAARP HAARP? Is that like AARP but for hairy old people? Or horny old people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 ...And commend the far right's ideologically-driven dogmatic hate speech and prattle. The topic under discussion was the recent religious based prattle. Sorry, the far left embodies the secularist religion. I thought I had it covered in my comments. You want me to condemn Rush's ramblings? I do. It's harmful to innocent victims and spiteful of an ideology he has contempt for. I share his contempt, but not at the expense of humans that are suffering. While I'm condemning and casting counter spells - here's one for Danny Glover. I condemn thee for the sheer ignorance of your disconnected prattle on Haiti's disaster being caused by the epic fail of Copenhagen. Fie on thee and those of your ilk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 The topic under discussion was the recent religious based prattle. Sorry, the far left embodies the secularist religion. I thought I had it covered in my comments. You want me to condemn Rush's ramblings? I do. It's harmful to innocent victims and spiteful of an ideology he has contempt for. I share his contempt, but not at the expense of humans that are suffering. While I'm condemning and casting counter spells - here's one for Danny Glover. I condemn thee for the sheer ignorance of your disconnected prattle on Haiti's disaster being caused by the epic fail of Copenhagen. Fie on thee and those of your ilk. With 90% of the country subscribing to some religion or other, I don't think it's fair to paint an entire party with "secularist religion". Secularism is the antithesis of religiosity. I'm not sure what you're talking about with Danny Glover (really, Danny Glover?), but a washed up actor hardly carries the weight of an mass-worshiped a-hole like Rush, figuratively and literally. My real point was, don't be so deluded by your own particular ideology that you exclude it when talking about the "prattle" of others. Even if it's yours, it's still ideology and it's still prattle, which may not be so easy to see when one is standing so very close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 With 90% of the country subscribing to some religion or other, I don't think it's fair to paint an entire party with "secularist religion". Secularism is the antithesis of religiosity. I'm not sure what you're talking about with Danny Glover (really, Danny Glover?), but a washed up actor hardly carries the weight of an mass-worshiped a-hole like Rush, figuratively and literally. My real point was, don't be so deluded by your own particular ideology that you exclude it when talking about the "prattle" of others. Even if it's yours, it's still ideology and it's still prattle, which may not be so easy to see when one is standing so very close. Here's what I wrote, "I condemn Pat Robertson's remarks as hateful and ideologically-driven dogmatic prattle. I condemn the far left's ideologically-driven dogmatic hate speech and prattle as well." Just where did I mention "Democrats"? The subject was religious intolerance. Yes, that Danny Glover the leftist activist. It's a bigger moron than Limbaugh - by far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts